Latest News: Bitwig Updates Bitwig Studio to 5.2
Sequencer clarification on note names.
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 1548 posts since 14 Feb, 2010
I think when you see the ONLY the note names of the pads in fold mode instead c1 - c# etc....
And that you can see the name in the notes!
I think its great like that! What do you all think?
(photshop isnt my strongest thing ) But i think you get the idea.
And that you can see the name in the notes!
I think its great like that! What do you all think?
(photshop isnt my strongest thing ) But i think you get the idea.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- KVRAF
- 3071 posts since 29 Sep, 2005
Sorry, didn't see this the first go round codec17.
If it helps your work flow, sure I'm for it.
Happy Musiking!
dsan
If it helps your work flow, sure I'm for it.
Happy Musiking!
dsan
My DAW System:
W7, i5, x64, 8Gb Ram, Edirol FA-101
W7, i5, x64, 8Gb Ram, Edirol FA-101
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 1548 posts since 14 Feb, 2010
And why the dots????? i rather have 3 letters instead that my name is longer...
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 1548 posts since 14 Feb, 2010
I rather have like when your on tripple screen... But unfortunately ive only got room for 2..
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 1548 posts since 14 Feb, 2010
Maybe im to selfish now... of course there are poeple working on a laptop.... But make it dynamic so you can make it bigger or stretch it out?
And another idea from studio one is that you can make your own midi note name templates... really handy for addictive drums or battery who doesnt support note names etc....
I think that BW will really benefit of this...
And another idea from studio one is that you can make your own midi note name templates... really handy for addictive drums or battery who doesnt support note names etc....
I think that BW will really benefit of this...
-
qtheerearranger qtheerearranger https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=325452
- KVRian
- 680 posts since 26 Mar, 2014 from Denver, Co
All you have posted on this thread, I would love to see implemented.
+1
+1
• Logic Pro 10.8.1
• MacBook Pro 2023 - M2 MAX - 96 GB RAM
• Focusrite Red 8Line + UAD Satellite
• MacBook Pro 2023 - M2 MAX - 96 GB RAM
• Focusrite Red 8Line + UAD Satellite
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 1548 posts since 14 Feb, 2010
No i never did.... Because i think 1.1and1.2 is more important!
But never knew you could maken FR to tech support.
I thought it was just for bugs,.. well something to when the BIG updates are out.
But never knew you could maken FR to tech support.
I thought it was just for bugs,.. well something to when the BIG updates are out.
-
- KVRist
- 383 posts since 3 May, 2013
I think the only way to be sure the developers see feature requests is by actually sending the request to them via the tech support, this way they have it on a reported list and they can decide if/when to implement.
I think a general rule is the original poster sends the feature request
And I dont think we should stop sending in requests and bugs because of the upcoming 1.1 and 1.2 updates
I think a general rule is the original poster sends the feature request
And I dont think we should stop sending in requests and bugs because of the upcoming 1.1 and 1.2 updates