Latest News: Bitwig Updates Bitwig Studio to 5.2
Bitwig 1.2 Beta 6 fails startup (illegal instruction) (linux)
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 194 posts since 30 Jun, 2012 from Belgium
Hey
Installed Beta 6 over beta 5, but i fails to start.
I getting message on cmd-line: illegal instruction.
Beta 5 and previous 1.0 and 1.1 versions worked perfectly. I don't think it has something to do with architecture, all executable files are 64-bit.
Anyone idea?
Installed Beta 6 over beta 5, but i fails to start.
I getting message on cmd-line: illegal instruction.
Beta 5 and previous 1.0 and 1.1 versions worked perfectly. I don't think it has something to do with architecture, all executable files are 64-bit.
Anyone idea?
-
- KVRian
- 1111 posts since 6 Jul, 2009
1.2b6 runs fine here under Gentoo 64bit ...
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 194 posts since 30 Jun, 2012 from Belgium
I've downloaded second time and 3rd time with chrome.
Filesize and md5sum is the same. Installing gives no problem, but starting gives the same issue.
Size: 205034948 Bytes
Md5sum: b384a540d086f45f234ffa9f041121e2
Can someone verify this?
Filesize and md5sum is the same. Installing gives no problem, but starting gives the same issue.
Size: 205034948 Bytes
Md5sum: b384a540d086f45f234ffa9f041121e2
Can someone verify this?
-
- KVRer
- 28 posts since 24 Jul, 2007
This usually happens if an application has been compiled with optimization for a too new processor type. Nothing you can do about it. Bitwig should recomplile with a more conservative arch type.
-
- KVRian
- 1111 posts since 6 Jul, 2009
e899bec140c58cb25e1b4d4d1c146603 bitwig-studio-1.2-BETA-5.debcajmere wrote:Can someone verify this?
b384a540d086f45f234ffa9f041121e2 bitwig-studio-1.2-BETA-6.deb
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 194 posts since 30 Jun, 2012 from Belgium
Drumfix wrote:This usually happens if an application has been compiled with optimization for a too new processor type. Nothing you can do about it. Bitwig should recomplile with a more conservative arch type.
Yes had that in my mind also but, i would find it strange that they change it from one beta to another beta in this stage. My cpu supports SSE3 what i required so it's a question so far.
Looks like my files are also ok.
I'll contact support.
-
- KVRian
- 1111 posts since 6 Jul, 2009
That's it.Drumfix wrote:This usually happens if an application has been compiled with optimization for a too new processor type. Nothing you can do about it. Bitwig should recomplile with a more conservative arch type.
AMD FX(tm)-4100 Quad-Core Processor + Gentoo + Bitwig 1.2b6 -> works
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 6000 + Gentoo + Bitwig 1.2b6 -> Illegal instruction
Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 6000 + Gentoo + Bitwig 1.2b5 -> works
So yes. Houston, we have a problem ...
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 194 posts since 30 Jun, 2012 from Belgium
Support is contacted. i'll see when i get an answer, what's going on.
Last edited by cajmere on Thu Sep 03, 2015 8:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRian
- 1111 posts since 6 Jul, 2009
See abiques post above yours...
https://de.linkedin.com/pub/bique-alexandre/8/6b6/893
https://de.linkedin.com/pub/bique-alexandre/8/6b6/893
-
- KVRian
- 1111 posts since 6 Jul, 2009
1.2b7 fixed this ...
-
- KVRian
- 1482 posts since 19 Aug, 2009
Does this mean that it is not as optimized for newer cpus?
(I wouldnt mind to have both versions for download)
(I wouldnt mind to have both versions for download)