|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This question came up while discussing the automatic voting system for the montly contest. The ideas are:
1. Allow voters to give 1-10 points to as many entries as they wish. This would eliminate the need for HMs. 2. Give each voter a certain amount of voting points (s)he can assign to as many entries as (s)he wishes. Perhaps with a limit on the maximum points per entry to prevent misuse. 3. Keep it the way it is. Vote for 10 songs (10 points to the first song...1 point to the last) with HMs as a comment. If you have any other ideas, feel free to post them. ---- the the impotence of proofreading |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ^ | Joined: 23 Sep 2003 Member: #9144 Location: ocation: cation: ation: tion: ion: on: n: : | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
i voted 3 ...
1 is too inconsistent and open to abuse IMHO 2 could work but a limit on maximum score for any one entry is a GOOD idea 3 i still like ... nice & simple slainte  rob |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ^ | Joined: 22 Jul 2002 Member: #3398 Location: flatness | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ^ | Joined: 18 Feb 2003 Member: #5983 Location: out there somewhere | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I voted 1, but on a second thought, 2 with a vote limit would be better indeed. Actually, with 55 voting points and a 10 points per entry limit it could be used as the classic top ten at the same time giving more freedom to the voters.
edit: Still, as far as I can see, we'll just stick to the classic top ten. ---- the the impotence of proofreading |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ^ | Joined: 23 Sep 2003 Member: #9144 Location: ocation: cation: ation: tion: ion: on: n: : | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
i'm classic. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ^ | Joined: 22 Sep 2003 Member: #9116 Location: under the sun | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I give 7 points to 3 and 3 points to 1... Does that result in option 2? |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ^ | Joined: 08 Nov 2003 Member: #10207 Location: Amsterdam | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I guess  ---- the the impotence of proofreading |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ^ | Joined: 23 Sep 2003 Member: #9144 Location: ocation: cation: ation: tion: ion: on: n: : | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Classic!
Though I'd also go for the notion of "Fixed number of points to distribute amongst any number of entries, but no more than 10 points to any one entry". But *only* if the process gets automated. Otherwise, it's an extra tally for the point-keeper, which sucks! - m ---- Markleford's band, The James Rocket: http://www.TheJamesRocket.com/ Markleford's tracks: http://www.markleford.com/music/ Markleford's free MFX, DXi2, DR-008 modules: http://www.TenCrazy.com/ |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ^ | Joined: 30 May 2002 Member: #2907 Location: My chair | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I have no problems with the current system - but the Top 10 should become the Top 20 if there are more than about 80 entries, and the Top 5 if there are less than about 20. ---- Time is an illusion - lunchtime doubly so. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ^ | Joined: 07 Apr 2004 Member: #20182 Location: Magrathea, The Universe | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Markleford wrote: Classic!
Though I'd also go for the notion of "Fixed number of points to distribute amongst any number of entries, but no more than 10 points to any one entry". But *only* if the process gets automated. Otherwise, it's an extra tally for the point-keeper, which sucks! Of course! That's only an idea for automatic voting count. slartibartfast wrote: I have no problems with the current system - but the Top 10 should become the Top 20 if there are more than about 80 entries, and the Top 5 if there are less than about 20.
We could make the number of voting points (option 2)proportional to the number of entries to achieve this automatically. ---- the the impotence of proofreading |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ^ | Joined: 23 Sep 2003 Member: #9144 Location: ocation: cation: ation: tion: ion: on: n: : | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DELETED |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ^ | Member: #-1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
i voted 1 just to make robs job harder each month 
really i voted 3 ---- look for the true freak label. do not!feed the vampyr. click link to hear the sounds of vurt coming into your ears |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ^ | Joined: 25 Jan 2003 Member: #5605 Location: through the looking glass | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I vote for 2. Seems absurd to assume that the 10th entry is 1/10th as good as the 1st entry. The 'distributed votes' scheme seems much fairer to me. I agree with Markleford's 10 point limit idea though, to prevent abuse (frontrunners giving outsiders all their points, etc). ---- Music with dinner is an insult both to the cook and the violinist. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ^ | Joined: 31 May 2001 Member: #598 Location: Marlow, S. Bucks, UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
griels - you should see how our political system works  |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ^ | Joined: 16 Apr 2002 Member: #2508 Location: Scotland | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 About to find out in fact ---- Music with dinner is an insult both to the cook and the violinist. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ^ | Joined: 31 May 2001 Member: #598 Location: Marlow, S. Bucks, UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| KVR Forum Index » Site Stuff | All times are GMT - 8 Hours |
|
Printable version |
Disclaimer: All communications made available as part of this forum and any opinions, advice, statements, views or other information expressed in this forum are solely provided by, and the responsibility of, the person posting such communication and not of kvraudio.com (unless kvraudio.com is specifically identified as the author of the communication).
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
