I'm a firm believer that technology becomes a musical instrument in the hands of a creative person (or group) that adopts it, stretches the boundaries, and makes compelling music that couldn't be made without it. Once that happens other creative people are drawn to the technology to emulate what they are hearing from the artist. Where would the organ be without J.S. Bach, or the electric guitar without Les Paul and Jimi Hendrix.
Though the computer is now the technology of choice for recording music, it is still at the tip of the iceberg in terms of a musical expression. That being said, more and more music is appearing that can't be done without it. In contrast to the three aforementioned artists more of the virtuosity of this music is in the preparation rather than the execution.
The Crystal Method has been doing this since the early 90s. The band is made up of two members, Ken Jordan and Scott Kirkland. Before The Crystal Method was formed Scott developed his style while working at a grocery store while Ken was a local DJ in Las Vegas as well as the college radio program director at UNLV. Ken taught Scott how to DJ, and when Ken moved to L.A. to work for a producer, Scott took over his job DJ'ing at the local club. Scott would subsequently follow Ken out to L.A., and they formed The Crystal Method in 1993.
Starting with purposed hardware synthesizers and samplers they used the computer for recording initially, but over time, as newer software applications came on the market, it changed their approach and the music they made.
I jumped at the chance to talk to them because they embody creativity with technology. As with an artist playing more traditional instruments listening to their music makes you want to try to figure out what they are doing!
You are from Las Vegas. Is that where you guys grew up?
Vegas is not exactly a music Mecca like Memphis or Detroit or the kind of place where musical styles are born…
Did you play in those kinds of bands? Cover bands and things like that?
No, I actually had no aspirations to be in a band, ever, until I was in this band. So I was working as music director and program director at KUNV, the college radio station. A couple of local bands asked me to go in the studio with them because they liked my taste in music and so from the first time I went in there I was like, "Oh, this is what I want to do."
The University had a recording studio and they had some classes, but they didn't have any degree programs. So I just took all of the electives I could in that and graduated and got my degree (in Communications) and left and went to LA.
What music did you play on your radio show?
Do you have any formal music training on a traditional instrument?
Well, when I was a kid I took a couple of semesters of piano. But I'm a horrible piano player. I'm pretty good on keyboards and a decent guitar player, but I'm not a very good musician at all. Scott is a player though.
The kind of music you guys do, there's a lot of virtuosity that happens behind the scenes. How do you make the transition to live performance?
What sort of gear did you have when you started?
They were pretty expensive at the time…
They were three grand, where the Mirage was normally $1000, maybe $1600 or something like that. But the difference was just unbelievable.
What you sampled into the Emax sounded like what you sampled into it. The Mirage sound was nothing like what you sampled. It's hilarious. I mean, the Mirage was good for interesting sounds, but not for playing back samples.
Scott also had a Roland D-50, but we didn't have a computer. Instead he used the Alesis 8-track sequencer. I think it was called the MMT-8. It looked the same as their drum machine.
You know, our first album, "Vegas"… (Enthusiastic 'yes') We combined our gear and set up a little mini studio in Vegas. The most we ever had on that album was seven digital tracks, seven recorded tracks at a time. One for sync, and then we'd have thirty tracks of live MIDI running for the mix. I'd try to bounce as much as I could, but back then storage was so precious and expensive, you know? I remember getting that 44 MB, big cartridge drive and just thinking, "Wow! That's so much storage, I'll never need more."
On "Trip Like I Do" (first cut on Vegas), what is that groove synthesizer?
Do you take that on the road?
You guys do a lot of collaborations, but it seems like mostly with singers. Have you done any collaborating with an instrumentalist?
When did you start using a computer?
What do you use for hardware controllers?
How do you develop your beats these days?
Does learning a new application as deep as Geist ever seem overwhelming?
It's all overwhelming. And I don't want to think about whether it's overwhelming, or I'll be overwhelmed.
I think Geist is best used standalone, but we typically use it as a plug-in. We'll use it as a standalone sometimes. We're mostly using it for beats but it's not just for beats, you know.
Do you trigger it from any particular piece of hardware?
Do you use any other unusual techniques in creating beats?
When you are using soft synths, do you guys start from scratch generally or do you use patches and tweak them?
Given the number of soft synths that are on the market today and given that you must have a museum full of analog gear, which do you tend to go for first when you've got ideas?
What are the "go to" analog synths?
Memorymoog we use a lot. Jupiter 6. Jupiter 8. We've never had a 303, but we had this other analog box, called Future Retro 777. It's 10 years old and it is magnificent. We still have a Roland SH 101 that sounds great.
Now having said all of that, we still have lots of other gear that we want to use so badly but every time we try to pair it on, there's some thing that's wrong with it. And we have to send it somewhere and spend tons of money and it comes back and still doesn't really… so the thing with the virtual instrument is that you select it, and it works perfectly. The plug-ins work much better than the old hardware systems, definitely.
The Martha Reeves' collaboration, how did you approach that versus doing your own songs?
We actually approached it very similar to the way we normally work. So we sort of had a target date way off in the future when we knew we were going to go to Detroit. We had to have some track built up by this certain time and we weren't going to work with Martha until then. So from that point until we got to Detroit, it was just like making one of our tracks.
They approached us and suggested some names and genres and so forth. So we had the track pretty well built up, minus vocals, lyrics, background, before we got to Detroit. We wrote lyrics and verses, in Detroit, the night before we went into the studio with Martha, and we didn't use any of those. Which ended up being good, it ended up being good film. She didn't like some of the stuff or we had to work on some of the stuff with her in the studio under pressure. It was a hectic day.
But the big hook background vocals and choruses, we did all of those backgrounds after the fact in LA. We had taken one line of Martha singing and sort of said, "This is the hook here." 'I ain't going nowhere.' So we took that and put it every four bars and then brought in some background singers and worked the hook around that.
So you went to Detroit and did that, but then you came back and sort of finished it up…?
So if you had to name three artists, musician acts, that you really enjoy that are not in the genre that you are in, who would you mention?
And if you had to pick three artists that are closer in the electronica realm?
I really love Wolfgang Gartner, who's from Central Coast, California, which is basically where my parents grew up. And this guy, I don't even know where he's from. It's Dyro. He's new and fantastic. And, uh…who else is great now? These guys aren't that new, but everything they do is great, is Far Too Loud.
---
Read More Interviews @ KVR
Related news...
18 Jun 2013Toontrack releases The Mix Toolbox EZmix Pack for EZmix
18 Jun 2013Get Z3ta+ 2 for 30% off
18 Jun 2013Sounds And Effects The New World is On Sale
18 Jun 2013XLN Audio releases 'Electric Grand' for the Addictive Keys platform
18 Jun 2013HelloSamples releases "Synth, Keys & Instruments" Compilation - 9 Instrument Kits for Ableton Live 9
18 Jun 2013Klanghelm releases "IVGI" free saturation and distortion plugin
17 Jun 2013Zenhiser releases "Manic Drummer" and "Huge Trap Drums" sample packs
17 Jun 2013One Small Clue updates Poise Percussion Sampler to v1.1.50.50
17 Jun 2013EverythingTurns releases ArcWave - Reaktor Ensemble
17 Jun 2013Ultimate Expansion Vol. 1: Analogy for LuSH-101 - Pre-release Offer
17 Jun 2013Nils Schneider updates Heat Synthesizer to v0.8.8
17 Jun 2013Signo SFX-Instruments releases "Rumbles" for Kontakt & EXS24
17 Jun 2013MaxSynths releases "Raveolution" for Massive
17 Jun 2013Big Tick updates Zen Presets Manager to 1.7.1
17 Jun 2013CWITEC releases TX16Wx Software Sampler 2.2.0 for Win and Mac VST & AU
17 Jun 2013Samplephonics releases 808 // 909 Bundle with £29 saving off RRP
17 Jun 2013HoRNet releases 3XOver - DJ-Style EQ Plug-in for Mac & Win VST & AU
17 Jun 2013ProducerLoops.com releases "Euphoric House Vol 1" Sample Pack
17 Jun 2013SKYLIFE announces SampleRobot Sampling Suite for Mac OS X
17 Jun 2013SKYLIFE SampleRobot Sampling Suite for Mac OS X Preliminary Order Promotion

















