Login / Register  0 items | $0.00 NewWhat is KVR? Submit News Advertise

User Reviews by KVR Members for Hexter

Rate & Review Hexter Now!

Reviewed By StudioDave [read all by] on 12th January 2013
Version reviewed: 1.0.2 on Linux
9.00
Was it helpful to you? Yes No

Audio quality: Much better than the original DX7, haha. Compared to my TX802, it's pretty close. I've A/B'd recordings made with my 802, Hexter nails its sound in most patches.

UI: Minimal. Fine by me, I'm after sound and facility.

Ease of use: Straightforward operation. UI is divided into three tabs and an editor page.

Features: Remote editing turned out to be very helpful. Imports a lot of DX/TX patch formats. Vast number of patches available. Easy to configure multiple instances when used with the Ghostess DSSI host, much cheaper than buying a used TX802 or TX816.

Downers: Not easy to substitute default bank. Mono-only output. Fixed MIDI receive channel (unless used with Ghostess).

I wrote a lot of music for a pair of TX802s, with a lot of custom patches in Voyetra's Patchmaster and Sideman formats. Hexter happily imported my original patches and recreates them with high accuracy. I use Hexter with Ghostess, freely routing its output to other JACK clients, e.g the CALF reverb plugin or an EQ from linuxDSP.

The last time I checked for a TX816 on eBay the asking price was $999, US dollars. Hexter sounds better, is easier to use, has more polyphony and no batteries, and costs $999 less. It really is a great deal.

Discussion: Active

Discussion

Please log in to join the discussion

Hexter

Average user rating of 9.00 from 1 review

Sean Bolton
 My KVR - Version Control & Lists
Not In Your MY KVR Groups
(or group limitation prevents versioning)
15 people have added Hexter to 4 My KVR groups 17 times
+1 in private groups

KVR Rank (Based on page views)

Overall: 4250  151

30-Day: 4079; 7-Day: 5716; Yesterday: 7508

Advertisements