Yeah, I know. I just thought it'd be cute to throw that in there. Actually if it's really bad buzz, it won't all go away with your fingers on the strings... but maybe I should just toss that "feature", as it is a bit silly.Hovmod wrote: I don't like the ground hum. I don't think it's a good idea to have that default at max volume. My guitar certainly doesn't make that high pitched noise ever... Plus often the hum stops when you touch the strings, so the hum is usually only heard when the guitar isn't really being used.
I took out the tune thing, but replaced it with a slider. When the power chords are in perfect tune it sounds a little too fakey IMO. If it's just a tiny bit out of tune it's more realistic.Hovmod wrote: The tune thing, well, I'm glad that's optional too. I smiled when I read about it, but I switched it off. Good idea to have a max outage setting. Again, my PRS doesn't much lose its tuning. And power chords sound WAY better when in perfect tune. So there.
And +1 on the sustain, particularly on the higher notes.
Yeah, I know, that's why I want you to be able to assign a controller to the lead/rhythm selection, so you can switch back and forth. I wanted a polyphony of 1 so it can capture hammer-ons/pull-offs.Hovmod wrote: What else. Oh, yes. Not many solos are played only one note at a time all way through you know. So the lead setting should at least have a polyphony of 2, imo. Or maybe a setting. That's the only difference between lead and rhythm, right? Polyphony?
Thought about it. It's a good idea, but if I did that then I'd want to implement something complicated like alternate strumming up and down, and then I'd want to make it sync up with your sequencer so it can accurately get the strumming up and down like a real guitarist would play... maybe in the future after some other stuff is fixed first.Hovmod wrote: How about a "strum" setting in addition to lead and rhythm? One where a chord gets a quick arpeggio treatment?
Hmmm, there's an idea!Tony Ostinato wrote: I wanna talk more about ranges. being able to assign the range that a cc will affect a knob is really cool and it rules on the vsti's that have and painfully sux on the ones that dont and i oftten have to resort to running filter scripts in midi input transformer, ouch.
What I was thinking of doing is put a smoothing on the controller changes (and then have a control adjust how much of this smoothing is applied). So if you suddenly have controller #11 (arbitrary number) go from 0 to 127 without anything between, it'll smooth it out. So you're saying to have this same sort of smoothing on the ranges as well? I know a method where I can cover both smoothing the controllers and ranges at the same time...Tony Ostinato wrote: i can easily envision presets where ill want breath to control both pick position and harmonic with seperate narrow ranges defined for both, and if thats not asking too much then id add itd be cool if the ranges could include smoothing/rounding.
