The problem with your entire post, and this WHOLE thread for that matter is simple...
IT'S JUST YOUR OPINION.
Who says Harold and Maude is a superior movie? Did somebody die and leave you as movie critique god?
You like Harold and Maude. Fine. Doesn't mean it's a great movie. Doesn't mean it's not a great movie.
People who try to apply subjective opinion to objective fact drive me totally bonkers.
Objective Fact: Donald Trump is the current President of the US.
Subjective Opinion: Harold and Maude is a great movie.
If you can't see the difference between fact and opinion then I have no hope for this thread ever having any meaning whatsoever.
Of course, it doesn't.
And the irony is, that's JUST my opinion.
Now do you understand?
i do not understand...because you are wrong. its not subjective. while one can talk about why they like or dislike a work...there are quantitative aspects that help determine if its good or not. if that were not the case...we wouldnt have things like doctorates in art or music theory classes. you CAN teach someone to make good art. if it was purely subjective...you wouldn't be able to do that.
but that is waaaay off topic....sufice to say we have a 20+ page thread here of people who understand that something can be underrated...regardless of fluffys assertion that all things are rated accurately.
so ill be done with this.