Edirol HQ Orchestral (Looking for it, please help)
-
- KVRer
- Topic Starter
- 3 posts since 27 May, 2006
I'm looking for Edirol Orchestral, as the topic suggests. It would seem that it is becoming abandonware. Know of anywhere I can buy it at a reasonable price? Maybe you have a copy to sell?
Thanks for reading.
Thanks for reading.
-
- KVRian
- 766 posts since 22 Mar, 2007 from Punta Gorda, Florida USA
I've had it for seven years and I still use it occaisionally. Back in 2002, it was not cheap, if I remember. I think that it was like $400.USD back then. I imagine that there are new copies on some music store shelves around the world. I checked Edirol, Roland and even Cakewalk sites without any luck. Good luck, I hope that you can find one at a good price.
-
- KVRAF
- 4278 posts since 14 Nov, 2008 from UK
Surely you should take a look at Synful or a rompler(sample based) orchestraMrGrunge wrote:I'm looking for Edirol Orchestral, as the topic suggests. It would seem that it is becoming abandonware. Know of anywhere I can buy it at a reasonable price? Maybe you have a copy to sell?
Thanks for reading.
-
- KVRian
- 550 posts since 2 Aug, 2006 from UK
Honestly, for simple, playable fat strings and quick orchestral arrangements, I think this can't be beaten. I have Garritan and EWQL and still find that it's far easier to doodle in Edirol than anything else.
The fact that the arrangements don't save out automatically (unlike every other VST in Christendom) is very irksome.
It's also *still* expensive.
The fact that the arrangements don't save out automatically (unlike every other VST in Christendom) is very irksome.
It's also *still* expensive.
Anger is a sublimated desire for control.
-
- KVRAF
- 4278 posts since 14 Nov, 2008 from UK
maybe dv247 will have a copy, sure I've seen some edirol vst's on their, for doodling I use a corner of a newspaper or an old envelopeMadrayken wrote:Honestly, for simple, playable fat strings and quick orchestral arrangements, I think this can't be beaten. I have Garritan and EWQL and still find that it's far easier to doodle in Edirol than anything else.
The fact that the arrangements don't save out automatically (unlike every other VST in Christendom) is very irksome.
It's also *still* expensive.
-
- Banned
- 1636 posts since 18 Mar, 2004 from Lincoln, CA
I've been using it for doing orchestral sketches for years and it really is an amazing sounding product for such a tiny footprint, and its only drawback at such a tiny size is the already mentioned non-saving patch selections (what kind of an idiot programmer came up with that???). All the other entry level orchestral libraries load too slow and feel too clunky in comparison to Edirol HQ Orchestral. I wonder why they didn't just lower the price, update the patch save, and keep selling it?
-
- KVRAF
- 2279 posts since 9 Jun, 2002 from East of Santa Monica
Haven't seen the Edirol orch for awhile, but if you have a SF2 player, the classic Proteus 2 orchestral Soundfont is a bargain:
http://www.digitalsoundfactory.com/soun ... cts_id/209
JD
http://www.digitalsoundfactory.com/soun ... cts_id/209
JD
-
- KVRAF
- 14658 posts since 19 Oct, 2003 from Berlin, Germany
Er... no. It's as expensive as Edirol HQ orchestra was back in the day and the only advantage is the violin in my opinion. The rest just sounds way too cheap.breakmixer wrote:Surely you should take a look at Synful
And HQ Orchestra is also a sample based rompler already - however a very optimized one.
I'd try to grab a copy at the official EDIROL store, but I fear it's still 200bucks. At least last time I checked.
-
- KVRAF
- 4278 posts since 14 Nov, 2008 from UK
-
- KVRian
- 766 posts since 22 Mar, 2007 from Punta Gorda, Florida USA
Because that makes too much sense.Lunatique wrote:I've been using it for doing orchestral sketches for years and it really is an amazing sounding product for such a tiny footprint, and its only drawback at such a tiny size is the already mentioned non-saving patch selections (what kind of an idiot programmer came up with that???). All the other entry level orchestral libraries load too slow and feel too clunky in comparison to Edirol HQ Orchestral. I wonder why they didn't just lower the price, update the patch save, and keep selling it?
-
- KVRer
- Topic Starter
- 3 posts since 27 May, 2006
I tried Synful. It was fun to play with but I wasn't too fond of it. I love the Cello on Orchestral and a few others which is why I'd like to find it.
I remember seeing it all over for $365 for years on end, even up until a year ago when I took another break. Now I can't find it anywhere.
Any other suggestions would be much welcomed. I plan on buying MusicLab's Real Guitar (used it years ago) unless there's a better sounding set out there.
I remember seeing it all over for $365 for years on end, even up until a year ago when I took another break. Now I can't find it anywhere.
Any other suggestions would be much welcomed. I plan on buying MusicLab's Real Guitar (used it years ago) unless there's a better sounding set out there.
-
- KVRAF
- 14658 posts since 19 Oct, 2003 from Berlin, Germany
Better sounding - maybe. As simple usable as RealGuitar... IMO not really.
Since it got updated with a proper MIDI Output mode, it's nearly unbeatable for controlling whatever the heck you feel like. In my case, I control Pettinhouse's Guitars with RealStrat if the strat sound is too thin for my purposes. In terms of acoustic guitar, I pretty much use nothing else than RealGuitar. With proper EQ and compression, you get more than awesome results.
What I loved on HQ Orchestra was the woodwind section. Especially the Oboe and the flute. Else you needed a lot of automation to let the strings sound more alive. Still for "only" 150MB (roughly) it was an outstanding product. Something that other products with 2GB+ in terms of size clearly lack. Nowadays I tend to layer Siedlaczek Orchestra with the VSL Opus 1 from Kontakt 2/3 (bundled soundlibrary) and maybe even my E-MU Virtuoso 2000 for the Percussion section. BTW: the E-MU and Edirol HQ Orchestra found their sample roots from Siedlaczek if I'm not totally mistaken here. Long time ago that I asked the developers...
Since it got updated with a proper MIDI Output mode, it's nearly unbeatable for controlling whatever the heck you feel like. In my case, I control Pettinhouse's Guitars with RealStrat if the strat sound is too thin for my purposes. In terms of acoustic guitar, I pretty much use nothing else than RealGuitar. With proper EQ and compression, you get more than awesome results.
What I loved on HQ Orchestra was the woodwind section. Especially the Oboe and the flute. Else you needed a lot of automation to let the strings sound more alive. Still for "only" 150MB (roughly) it was an outstanding product. Something that other products with 2GB+ in terms of size clearly lack. Nowadays I tend to layer Siedlaczek Orchestra with the VSL Opus 1 from Kontakt 2/3 (bundled soundlibrary) and maybe even my E-MU Virtuoso 2000 for the Percussion section. BTW: the E-MU and Edirol HQ Orchestra found their sample roots from Siedlaczek if I'm not totally mistaken here. Long time ago that I asked the developers...
-
- KVRAF
- 6168 posts since 26 Sep, 2003 from right here, as you can see ...
it's so unbelievable ingnorant that edirol still, after all that time, did not hesitate to fix this ...Madrayken wrote:>snip< The fact that the arrangements don't save out automatically (unlike every other VST in Christendom) is very irksome. >snip<
regards,
brok landers
BIGTONEsounddesign
gear is as good as the innovation behind it-the man
brok landers
BIGTONEsounddesign
gear is as good as the innovation behind it-the man
-
- Banned
- 1636 posts since 18 Mar, 2004 from Lincoln, CA
AFAIK, Edirol's are rooted in the legendary Roland orchestral sounds. I don't know of Roland licensed theirs from Siedlaczek or if they were designed by their own people (perhaps Eric Persings).Compyfox wrote:BTW: the E-MU and Edirol HQ Orchestra found their sample roots from Siedlaczek if I'm not totally mistaken here. Long time ago that I asked the developers...
-
- KVRer
- Topic Starter
- 3 posts since 27 May, 2006
Well, I e-mailed Edirol. Seems I was out of the loop concerning a few things, but here's how the conversation went.
Roland Response: "You are correct - the Edirol HQ Orchestral software is no longer available and we currently have no replacement for this product. You may want to check out a product called [snip - huge Cakewalk plug]"
Me: "Does that mean Edirol Orchestral is no longer supported as well?"
Roland Response: "Yes, at this point Edirol is not making any of the Virtual Sound Canvas, Hypercanvas, or Orchestral software products. It is possible they will manufacture more in the future, but since Roland acquired Cakewalk at the beginning of this year, it is more likely they (Cakewalk) will be producing any further software products for us."
I was looking for a "We no longer support X products" but instead they told me they no longer manufacture X products. It's an interesting foot-in-the-door reponse, but like everyone has said, it's discontinued. I did all but ask "Is it abandonware?" haha.
Roland Response: "You are correct - the Edirol HQ Orchestral software is no longer available and we currently have no replacement for this product. You may want to check out a product called [snip - huge Cakewalk plug]"
Me: "Does that mean Edirol Orchestral is no longer supported as well?"
Roland Response: "Yes, at this point Edirol is not making any of the Virtual Sound Canvas, Hypercanvas, or Orchestral software products. It is possible they will manufacture more in the future, but since Roland acquired Cakewalk at the beginning of this year, it is more likely they (Cakewalk) will be producing any further software products for us."
I was looking for a "We no longer support X products" but instead they told me they no longer manufacture X products. It's an interesting foot-in-the-door reponse, but like everyone has said, it's discontinued. I did all but ask "Is it abandonware?" haha.