Now that's good news.AnX wrote:D3 is coming this yearrecursive one wrote:Well, good to know. I guess whatever it will be it will sell really well, but I'd still prefer seeing something less focued on being "vintage" and "an emulation" but rather more innovative, perhaps a continuation to Dune series with better sound (like more coloured/characterful/analogue-like).Richard_Synapse wrote: We have now been working on a couple of vintage synth emulations
Synapse Audio Minimoog emulation "The Legend" for VST/AU and RE released!
-
- KVRAF
- 5664 posts since 7 Feb, 2013
You may think you can fly ... but you better not try
- KVRian
- 1465 posts since 25 Sep, 2011
It's BigTone (Nico Herz).recursive one wrote:Brian Transeau?EnGee wrote:Maybe we need to look into BT hardware synths or what he bought lately if we want to guess
What is the connection?
-
- KVRian
- 899 posts since 22 Nov, 2017
Hi. interesting positions. Maybe I share my experience as a person who is practicing meditation for several years.fluffy_little_something wrote:I don't think that's a great analogy because the eye and the ear are rather different. There is only one visible reality that needs to be approached by render techniques. Either it looks realistic or it doesn't.v1o wrote:You know despite the advancements made by groundbreaking synths like the Legend (and also Monark, Repro-5 etc) there are still people not convinced that plugins can sound like real discrete analogue hardware.
I was recently reading posts by Andrew Simper on GS. He was saying there still isn’t enough computational power to do the job, too many corners are cut by current methods commonly used in plugins. He was talking about having VST plugins that work more like 3D raytrace renderers which strive for greater realism by taking hours (even days) to do the calculations to generate images. So he was talking about having your plugins that work overnight to render your audio in the highest possible quality.
With synths sounds there are a lot of different realities. You can change various parameters and it still is an authentic reality. When you change any visual parameters (colors, gamma etc.), the eye will think it doesn't look realistic anymore.
Also, I think vision is much more demanding and sophisticated than hearing. Which is also why to most people going blind is more problematic than going deaf.
I experienced that the only thing the eye is able to see is form and colour. The only thing the ear is able to hear is sonic waves. Everything else is made up by the mind based on trained concepts. To make it simple. It's all an illusion. Due to this fact nearly no-one is able to see and hear thins as they really are. We see and hear concepts and we decide whether we like or dislike them on the base of preferences.
-
- KVRAF
- 5179 posts since 16 Nov, 2014
"Couple of vintage synth emulations"....plus Dune 3 soon maybe.
Seems i have to save some money.
What about a Synapse Audio complete bundle....i would be on board
(if Synapse Audio synths just would have microtuning it would be awesome).
Seems i have to save some money.
What about a Synapse Audio complete bundle....i would be on board
(if Synapse Audio synths just would have microtuning it would be awesome).
-
Funkybot's Evil Twin Funkybot's Evil Twin https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=116627
- KVRAF
- 11519 posts since 16 Aug, 2006
I wouldn't be too sure about that. Richard recently purchased a Memorymoog and as pointed out to me on Gearslutz when I made a similar post questioning how close a Memorymoog and a Mini are, the Memorymoog has CEM chips and a few more differences. I'm pretty convinced the Memory is at least one of the vintage emulations.Dullee wrote:
I'd say, wouldn't be Memorymoog, since The Legend already has polyphony and ironically is a better polyphonic Minimoog than Memorymoog was.
Also, if my memory isn't completely failing, I believe Richard also recently acquired another vintage poly synth which was mentioned in the same thread. I'm thinking Oberheim because I remember someone relating the purchase to the Behringer OB-X clone in the works. If you're Richard, and gonna drop that kind of coin on vintage polys, I'd think emulation was on the agenda.
Last edited by Funkybot's Evil Twin on Mon Apr 16, 2018 2:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Banned
- 118 posts since 9 Mar, 2018
Ah, so I found that Gearslutz thread. And I read this
Memorymoog is unlikely to be next, because the MIDI kit still needs to be installed, and probably some other minor work needs to be done.
Yes, yes, yes! OB-Xa. Richard, do it. I'm like, I already bought itAnyway we have an OB-Xa here now, fully recapped/refurbished, sounds really amazing
Richard
Last edited by Dullee on Mon Apr 16, 2018 2:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRAF
- 5664 posts since 7 Feb, 2013
Aren't there at least three alternative emulations of this hardware, one of them being free?
You may think you can fly ... but you better not try
-
- Banned
- 118 posts since 9 Mar, 2018
FWIW, my money is where you future emulation favorites lie.That said pretty much those synths, i.e. the Memorymoog, Jupiter-8, Elka Synthex, Oberheim OB-XA and Prophet-600 (with the Gligli upgrade) are our favorites for future emulations. CS-80 too, though its weight, scarcity and complexity makes it less likely and less practical to emulate.
Richard
Especially CS-80, Synthex and OB-Xa considerations. Considering The Legend quality, no brainer.
None that could match Synapse quality, I imagine.Aren't there at least three alternative emulations of this hardware, one of them being free?
- Banned
- 10732 posts since 17 Nov, 2015
-
- KVRAF
- 5664 posts since 7 Feb, 2013
I see. Never owned either of them, for me the differences between OB-X and OB-Xa seem minor but I guess they may be important for those who aculally own or have owned the original synths.AnX wrote:I think they are OB X, not OB Xa.recursive one wrote:Aren't there at least three alternative emulations of this hardware, one of them being free?
You may think you can fly ... but you better not try
-
- Banned
- 118 posts since 9 Mar, 2018
Richard mentioned itthe differences between OB-X and OB-Xa seem minor
I took a closer look at both, I'd expect them to sound rather similar, in certain aspects identical (both use the same env chips for instance). The interface is almost identical as well. At a quick glance it seems the OB-X has the extra XMOD whereas the OB-XA has the 4-pole filter in addition to the 2-pole filter, both useful.