AnX wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 12:30 pmyou have Dune3 right?kevvvvv wrote: ↑Thu Jun 20, 2019 4:10 pm I've no experience of drum synths much beyond pad-triggered sample players (battery, impact, BFD).
But last week I got 2together Audio's Kick Synth, really like it, and want more of everything!!!
I'd like to hear which drum synth you prefer.
I'm more interested in a comprehensive staple drum synth that'll last, rather than a cool but limited gadget.
Maybe with multichannel outs, midi import/export, bags of presets, nice tweakability
Your thoughts welcome
perfect for any type of drum sound
some good presets included as ideas/start points
one shot WT mode for transients (included in factory bank) , and 8 layers to sculpt the sound
no multi out, but a drum sound uses f-all cpu, so you can easily build a decent kit
Which drum synth do you recommend
- Banned
- 10732 posts since 17 Nov, 2015
-
- KVRist
- 146 posts since 4 Dec, 2014 from Ukraine, Germany->Munich
-
- KVRAF
- 2982 posts since 9 Dec, 2008
When ppl recommend a regular synth - Dune e.g. - to use as a drum synth, isn't it overlooking the fact that when most ppl say drum synth, they mean multi-timbral and easy to use, rather than having to set up individual tracks.
Or am I missing something here?
Or am I missing something here?
-
- KVRAF
- 2418 posts since 9 Nov, 2016
* Roland cloud TR-808 and 909.
* Wavealchemy Drumvolution and Revolution which are sample based but with a nice sequencer.
Samplebased, so less usefull for the OP but may be interesting for someone else.
* Wavealchemy Drumvolution and Revolution which are sample based but with a nice sequencer.
Samplebased, so less usefull for the OP but may be interesting for someone else.
- Banned
- 10732 posts since 17 Nov, 2015
most ppl may do, but the OP specifically said....
... hence my recommendation
- KVRian
- 1487 posts since 14 Jul, 2013 from Sweden
Stix by XILS-lab.kevvvvv wrote: ↑Thu Jun 20, 2019 4:10 pm I've no experience of drum synths much beyond pad-triggered sample players (battery, impact, BFD).
But last week I got 2together Audio's Kick Synth, really like it, and want more of everything!!!
I'd like to hear which drum synth you prefer.
I'm more interested in a comprehensive staple drum synth that'll last, rather than a cool but limited gadget.
Maybe with multichannel outs, midi import/export, bags of presets, nice tweakability
Your thoughts welcome
the most powerful and flexible drum-synth around.
At the end of the day you'll end up taking that one..trust me
- KVRAF
- 3338 posts since 6 Aug, 2009
ghettosynth wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 10:47 amBullshit, and I don't say that lightly. Look, don't get me wrong, I f**king love my iLok stuff, but a dongle is necessary to get the proper value from iLok. NI is nothing like soft-iLok. NI is supportive, available, responsive, and not uptight. The most common problems with iLok revolve around soft-ilok and the hoops people have to jump through to fix problems.Lotuzia wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 10:39 amSoft Ilok is nearly identical to NI service center, Arturia/wave systems, and, more generally, all c/r systems though (i.e thousands of thousands of users), and less restrictive than cloud services (Roland etc). And of course it doesn't require an hardware dongle.david.beholder wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 1:23 amYes, unfortunately.
From site: Protection iLok (iLok1, iLok 2 and Soft), USB-eLicenser
NI is far less heavyweight than iLok.
Get the dongle, and stop trusting your licenses to something that is super volatile, your computer, or, don't bother with iLok and use C/R protection that is, at least, backed by a big company that isn't quite so uptight.
Dongle iLok: Highly recommended
NI C/R: Highly recommended
Soft iLok: Absolutely not recommended
i use the soft ilok and all is well. suits my needs (one mac,no needed usb port). not sure what problems you (or others) might have with it, but fine here.
-
- KVRAF
- 15517 posts since 13 Oct, 2009
That's what everyone says until it doesn't work.fisherKing wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 1:56 pmghettosynth wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 10:47 amBullshit, and I don't say that lightly. Look, don't get me wrong, I f**king love my iLok stuff, but a dongle is necessary to get the proper value from iLok. NI is nothing like soft-iLok. NI is supportive, available, responsive, and not uptight. The most common problems with iLok revolve around soft-ilok and the hoops people have to jump through to fix problems.Lotuzia wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 10:39 amSoft Ilok is nearly identical to NI service center, Arturia/wave systems, and, more generally, all c/r systems though (i.e thousands of thousands of users), and less restrictive than cloud services (Roland etc). And of course it doesn't require an hardware dongle.david.beholder wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 1:23 amYes, unfortunately.
From site: Protection iLok (iLok1, iLok 2 and Soft), USB-eLicenser
NI is far less heavyweight than iLok.
Get the dongle, and stop trusting your licenses to something that is super volatile, your computer, or, don't bother with iLok and use C/R protection that is, at least, backed by a big company that isn't quite so uptight.
Dongle iLok: Highly recommended
NI C/R: Highly recommended
Soft iLok: Absolutely not recommended
i use the soft ilok and all is well. suits my needs (one mac,no needed usb port). not sure what problems you (or others) might have with it, but fine here.
- KVRAF
- 3338 posts since 6 Aug, 2009
i've been using the software version for years (since first became an option), and it's fine. if you look at any software, you can say the same thing: "That's what everyone says until it doesn't work."ghettosynth wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 2:01 pmThat's what everyone says until it doesn't work.fisherKing wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 1:56 pmghettosynth wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 10:47 amBullshit, and I don't say that lightly. Look, don't get me wrong, I f**king love my iLok stuff, but a dongle is necessary to get the proper value from iLok. NI is nothing like soft-iLok. NI is supportive, available, responsive, and not uptight. The most common problems with iLok revolve around soft-ilok and the hoops people have to jump through to fix problems.Lotuzia wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 10:39 amSoft Ilok is nearly identical to NI service center, Arturia/wave systems, and, more generally, all c/r systems though (i.e thousands of thousands of users), and less restrictive than cloud services (Roland etc). And of course it doesn't require an hardware dongle.david.beholder wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 1:23 amYes, unfortunately.
From site: Protection iLok (iLok1, iLok 2 and Soft), USB-eLicenser
NI is far less heavyweight than iLok.
Get the dongle, and stop trusting your licenses to something that is super volatile, your computer, or, don't bother with iLok and use C/R protection that is, at least, backed by a big company that isn't quite so uptight.
Dongle iLok: Highly recommended
NI C/R: Highly recommended
Soft iLok: Absolutely not recommended
i use the soft ilok and all is well. suits my needs (one mac,no needed usb port). not sure what problems you (or others) might have with it, but fine here.
we all don't have the same issues, or experiences! (just saying...)
-
- KVRAF
- 4506 posts since 25 Mar, 2016 from Seattle
I think Stix could be a really good drum synth but it’s workflow sucks for me, it’s all too fiddly.sfd wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 1:28 pmStix by XILS-lab.kevvvvv wrote: ↑Thu Jun 20, 2019 4:10 pm I've no experience of drum synths much beyond pad-triggered sample players (battery, impact, BFD).
But last week I got 2together Audio's Kick Synth, really like it, and want more of everything!!!
I'd like to hear which drum synth you prefer.
I'm more interested in a comprehensive staple drum synth that'll last, rather than a cool but limited gadget.
Maybe with multichannel outs, midi import/export, bags of presets, nice tweakability
Your thoughts welcome
the most powerful and flexible drum-synth around.
At the end of the day you'll end up taking that one..trust me
I’d try Microtoniq, save yourself $100 and have fun programming it.
-
- KVRAF
- 15517 posts since 13 Oct, 2009
There is no way that you can equivocate NI's system with soft-ilok. The failure mode is what defines the difference. It doesn't matter how long you've been using it without failure. That any software fails is not the point. You cannot say that the vendor will be indifferent to your needs about any software, some vendors are better than others. If you want to store your licenses on a machine that has many points of failure, knock yourself out, but your datapoint does not mitigate the failure and hassle that other people have had to deal with.fisherKing wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 2:20 pmi've been using the software version for years (since first became an option), and it's fine. if you look at any software, you can say the same thing: "That's what everyone says until it doesn't work."ghettosynth wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 2:01 pmThat's what everyone says until it doesn't work.fisherKing wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 1:56 pmghettosynth wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 10:47 amBullshit, and I don't say that lightly. Look, don't get me wrong, I f**king love my iLok stuff, but a dongle is necessary to get the proper value from iLok. NI is nothing like soft-iLok. NI is supportive, available, responsive, and not uptight. The most common problems with iLok revolve around soft-ilok and the hoops people have to jump through to fix problems.Lotuzia wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 10:39 amSoft Ilok is nearly identical to NI service center, Arturia/wave systems, and, more generally, all c/r systems though (i.e thousands of thousands of users), and less restrictive than cloud services (Roland etc). And of course it doesn't require an hardware dongle.david.beholder wrote: ↑Fri Jun 21, 2019 1:23 am
Yes, unfortunately.
From site: Protection iLok (iLok1, iLok 2 and Soft), USB-eLicenser
NI is far less heavyweight than iLok.
Get the dongle, and stop trusting your licenses to something that is super volatile, your computer, or, don't bother with iLok and use C/R protection that is, at least, backed by a big company that isn't quite so uptight.
Dongle iLok: Highly recommended
NI C/R: Highly recommended
Soft iLok: Absolutely not recommended
i use the soft ilok and all is well. suits my needs (one mac,no needed usb port). not sure what problems you (or others) might have with it, but fine here.
we all don't have the same issues, or experiences! (just saying...)
I have had hard drive and SSD failure over the years. That is something that happens, you can mitigate it, but it's simply a matter of time before you have an unexpected failure. It's not a problem with hardware iLok, it is with soft iLok. Yes, dongles can fail, but the likelihood is lower and there are ways to mitigate that.
-
- KVRAF
- 15517 posts since 13 Oct, 2009
Yes, yes we have. We will continue to have it as long as people say things that aren't true, like soft-ilok is basically the same as NI's system. That's not even true from a functionality POV. With NI's system there is no need to transfer your license from an old computer to the cloud before authorizing a new computer, in fact, there's no mechanism for that at all.