
Annoying but I’m just gonna go with the flow.
Currently working on my composition a bit.
Sometimes B-sections come so naturally but sometimes they are a giant chore. I think some chord progressions just don’t want any competition

It did that to me too. I decided to just enter what i already have.Local Man wrote: ↑Sun Feb 21, 2021 11:58 amI got my first case of Rand changing one of my patches after saving![]()
Annoying but I’m just gonna go with the flow.
Currently working on my composition a bit.
Sometimes B-sections come so naturally but sometimes they are a giant chore. I think some chord progressions just don’t want any competition![]()
I told myself that I would post a different time signature for each OSC entry in 2021 - but I've already broken my word! Oh, well, at least I've got a straight groove and a shuffle so far!
I don't use Youlean, but judging by the screenshots the "LUFS Integrated" seems like the one to go for.
Funny I did like more than few revisions over period of two weeks without any problems, but now after a while two of the patches sounds different. And those were the sounds I didn't edited at all so I don't even know how to recreate them
Same here. I don’t think I’m gonna stress too much about giving this one a high level of polish.
Yes, noticed this when doing 48-44 renderELEX wrote: ↑Thu Feb 25, 2021 4:28 pmBtw, possibly useful :
When doing a downsampled render in REAPER, problems occurred . One patch was completely off ( the @#$%&! 'detune' knob - again ), others less obviously so, but still. Bouncing the master at full rate, then doing a downsampled render of the bounced audio track worked just fine.
LOL!
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2020
Submit: News, Plug-ins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement