So used to the interface from days gone by of the Atari ST & Amiga to move on
Software
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 39 posts since 20 Mar, 2005 from United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland
Reading alot of the posts and taking into consideration everyone has there own specific favourite and comfort of choice ... but does anyone else actually use Cubase 5.1 R1 or is it just me?
So used to the interface from days gone by of the Atari ST & Amiga to move on
So used to the interface from days gone by of the Atari ST & Amiga to move on
-
- KVRian
- 921 posts since 14 Oct, 2002 from Sweden
I still use CubaseVST32 v5.1 r1 on Win98.broxiger wrote: ... but does anyone else actually use Cubase 5.1 R1 or is it just me?
So used to the interface from days gone by of the Atari ST & Amiga to move on
Works like a charm.
...and welcome to KvR.
-
- KVRAF
- 7864 posts since 24 May, 2002 from Tutukaka, New Zealand
I moved over from 5.1 -> SX about 6 months ago.
But I still miss VST5.1...it was a fine GUI as far as I'm concerned, and there were a few functions within 5.1 that I would still like to see brought back into SX. I like the increased sound quality in SX, and I like the far better audio manipulation possible within it, but as a comfortable easy-to-use, get-things-done host, VST5.1 wins hands down for me. If I hadn't had to hand it back in for the upgrade, I would probably still use it as my main arranger even today (I'd probably use SX for the audio manipulation and maybe recording though).
And 5.1 on Win98SE was a stable platform. Win XP is marginally better, but it's not noticeably a great deal more stable than my lovely old system.
Unless you find there are things you really need to do that 5.1 won't do, then I'd say stick with it...upgrading to SX can be a painful process, and one I'm only maybe 75% sure I needed to do.
But I still miss VST5.1...it was a fine GUI as far as I'm concerned, and there were a few functions within 5.1 that I would still like to see brought back into SX. I like the increased sound quality in SX, and I like the far better audio manipulation possible within it, but as a comfortable easy-to-use, get-things-done host, VST5.1 wins hands down for me. If I hadn't had to hand it back in for the upgrade, I would probably still use it as my main arranger even today (I'd probably use SX for the audio manipulation and maybe recording though).
And 5.1 on Win98SE was a stable platform. Win XP is marginally better, but it's not noticeably a great deal more stable than my lovely old system.
Unless you find there are things you really need to do that 5.1 won't do, then I'd say stick with it...upgrading to SX can be a painful process, and one I'm only maybe 75% sure I needed to do.
-
- KVRAF
- 4692 posts since 28 Jan, 2003 from In these very interwebs
