MeldaProduction

mevla · Post by **mevla** » Thu Sep 06, 2018 8:54 pm

When you have each EQ made by Melda, what makes you go for one EQ instead of another ? Are you going for a specific EQ according to the task and if so, what are the decision points ? How would you qualify the range of usefulness of each EQ ?

Cheers.

steve2KVR · Post by **steve2KVR** » Thu Sep 06, 2018 9:20 pm

...well I've got them all (I think), but have settled into just using MADeq because it's "easy" and I've developed a "ton" of presets. So it has become the go-to selection...hth.../s~

jmg8 · Post by **jmg8** » Fri Sep 07, 2018 8:10 am

MAutoDynamicEQ or MTurboEQ

I use MTurboEQ for musical stuff, like shaping/colouring a sound.

MAutoDynamicEQ for technical stuff like, notching out ringing, matching, de essing, ducking etc.

djmani · Post by **djmani** » Sat Sep 08, 2018 2:05 am

Ugh, I cannot use the eq because the Grafficks iz uninspiring. I'm waiting fer teh 12 dimensions UI

steve2KVR · Post by **steve2KVR** » Sat Sep 08, 2018 2:31 am

...(**).../s~

masitito · Post by **masitito** » Sat Sep 08, 2018 8:00 am

djmani wrote:Ugh, I cannot use the eq because the Grafficks iz uninspiring. I'm waiting fer teh 12 dimensions UI

I have made a prototype using 8 dimensions. Couldn't cope with more then 6 though. 12 dimensions are only for superhumans like you.

Masi

mevla · Post by **mevla** » Sat Sep 08, 2018 3:06 pm

It must be said that the bass is EQued quite thin at the 5th dimension. Great bass though, especially in the 2nd part.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kjxSCAalsBE

djmani · Post by **djmani** » Sat Sep 08, 2018 5:20 pm

[quote="steve2KVR"]...well I've got them all (I think), but have settled into just using MADeq because it's "easy" and I've developed a "ton" of presets. So it has become the go-to selection...hth.../s~[/quote
I knew you would write "easy"
If you spend more time learning, studying and understanding instead of sighing

steve2KVR · Post by **steve2KVR** » Sat Sep 08, 2018 5:48 pm

...(***)....s~

The Noodlist · Post by **The Noodlist** » Sat Sep 08, 2018 7:09 pm

Been using MFreeformEqualizer's frequency match feature as a extra pair of ears.

sirmonkey · Post by **sirmonkey** » Sun Sep 09, 2018 6:00 am

Autodynamic is my favorite. It's the most versatile or powerful EQ out there.
It can do things such as: Boost a band, but boost less as the input level around that band increase. It can boost a frequency range when the signal level is low, but also attenuate that same band when the signal is too loud. It can also boost or attenuate the harmonics of each frequency band.
Actually, this would get really long if I tried to explain it all. But there's an excellent video series that illustrates Autodynamic EQ way better than I can. This will really give you the knowledge that you need, in a clear and understandable way:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vUBxW_NLZK8
This EQ is very surgical when you need it to be. And it is very "musical" when you want it to be. And you can use it for very precise ducking. And the list goes on and on. But I digress, as you have a few videos to watch!

sirmonkey · Post by **sirmonkey** » Sun Sep 09, 2018 6:01 am

- ooops, double post!

mevla · Post by **mevla** » Sun Sep 09, 2018 8:34 am

sirmonkey wrote: This EQ is very surgical when you need it to be. And it is very "musical" when you want it to be. And you can use it for very precise ducking. And the list goes on and on. But I digress, as you have a few videos to watch!

I haven't noticed those videos yet. Thanks !

Cheers.

mibby · Post by **mibby** » Sun Sep 09, 2018 2:44 pm

Yes, THANKS @sirmonkey !

MeldaProduction · Post by **MeldaProduction** » Wed Sep 12, 2018 6:54 pm

If I want something really quick, which usually means bass / treble, I usually grab MTurboEQ. But most of the time I'm not in such a rush, so I use MAutoDynamicEq, for pretty much everything.

MeldaProduction

KVR Audio

How are you using Melda's EQs ?