What Am doing wrong

[gentleclockdivider]

The boolean works correctly , outputs true if both inputs are true , controlling a midi branch
Yet every note is heard , I did something similar yesterday and it worked .
Here's the patch

[gentleclockdivider]

Hmm , the boolean is outputting a single element list , which is proably the reason why the brach doen't recognize the truthy /false value
Forgot to menion that all three boolean operators are set to size 1 , yet outputting single digit lists

[colin@loomer]

That's right: a non-empty array is considered a truthy value (whilst an empty array is considered falsy.)

I haven't looked closely - I will do tomorrow morning - but I would guess that the boolean tables are outputting [false] or [true] arrays as they will always output an array of their entire contents in response to a signal, no matter the size of the table, even one with just a single element.

If you want to get the boolean value out of the array, I'd just use something like a [head] module to read the first (and only) element, and place this module between the output of the last [boolean table] and the [branch] control input. You could also use an explicit [get element], but I think [head] would work fine here.

As an aside, I'm assuming at some point you'll be reading from different indices out of the table? Note that if you pass a single number to the read inlet, let's say 3, it'll only output the element at position 3, NOT an array in this case.

[gentleclockdivider]

Here I am using a single boolean ON/OFF state ( so true or false by ckicking on it ) to control a branch , needless to say it doesn't work becasue it outputs a single digit list
pack note is controlled from metro
I am sure I did something similar yesterday and It worked , controlling branches by boolean

It,s not outputting multiple values at one , just one truth or false , [true] , [false] , what's the use of it if it can't control a branch becasue of the [ ] ?

[colin@loomer]

I am sure I did something similar yesterday and It worked , controlling branches by boolean

By a scalar boolean (which will work), or by the array output of a boolean table (which won't, as a non-zero array will always be truthy)? I will take a proper look at your patch first thing tomorrow and get back to you asap.

[gentleclockdivider]

What I did yesterday was scanning through the boolean table ( length 64) , either by using a slider or the step output of a seq , , the output was either true or false and not [true] , [false] and thus able to control a branch , because the slider and step output are NOT signals and thus not outputting the whole list .
Eiter way I think it's kind of useless that a 1 size boolean outputs lists , see first example , for he meantime I am just going to use two uni.integr distribution (range 0-1) going into logic modules and use the boolean tables as visual indicators

[gentleclockdivider]

Anyway , iirc you said that you were playing with the idea of unpacking lists , this way we can also use the graph table as a multislider , outputting individual values