aciddose wrote:yes, of course. now in what way are my statements incorrect?
oh, just the parts where you tell us what bending is, and how it should be done. so just the bits about circuit bending, really.
you can not get anywhere with circuit bending without learning some additional stuff.
unless, of course, you get somewhere. and of course, plenty of people have
circuit bending methods by themselves will get you nothing but a bunch of messed up toys like the ones which already exist out there.
unless it gets you something different. and of course, plenty of people have
the common understanding of "circuit bending" is as i've described it back in that post, anyway.
its very strange then, that across hundreds of benders sites, yours appears to be the uncommon
understanding to plenty of people
your definition is not the common understanding, although it may be your dogma.
and yet plenty of people have that
same understanding, and its quite common indeed.
im sure that simple fact pisses you off, though.
the majority of individuals i know who make money by circuit bending apply the techniques plus additional knowledge to instruments like tr- drum machines and others without destroying them!
and im sure you know lots of them. that really ties with your complete ignorance of Ghazala.
the commercial benders. yeah, they'd be the ones to ask. you're well aware that a lot of benders see its commercialisation as a complete anathema to the principles dont you, and that its an argument which reoccurs on the main mailing lists time after time?
what am i saying. of course you dont. you dont know any benders, or anything about it.
the average individual reading this thread isnt going to follow your dogma
the average individual reading this, unlike you, is smart enough to work out that I dont have one.
i note that most average benders in this thread
havent followed your
dogma, though. that must really piss you off.
they're going to want to open up that tr-whatever and start throwing wires in. they'll get nowhere without having some additional knowledge.
or they'll get somewhere
. and of course, plenty of people have
leave your semantic bullshit out of this.
if you're going to bring so much bullshit here, i think its only fair I get to respond by addressing the semantics of your bullshit.