Newbie in modular synthesis: Bidule or Reaktor?
-
AdamWysokinski AdamWysokinski https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=393916
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 243 posts since 16 Feb, 2017
Hi,
I design sounds for my own productions (ambient) and want to learn modular synthesis. I have some programming background and already started learning SuperCollider.
As I would also like something with graphical interface and easy integration with my DAW (I'm on Logic), I'm looking for your recommendation which one (Bidule or Reaktor) is better as a long-term investment of my time spent on learning. I've tried demos of both Bidule (nice, quite intuitive, love the ability to use AU and VST plugins) and Reaktor (I like its GUI, dislike its appetite for CPU power).
Regards,
Adam
I design sounds for my own productions (ambient) and want to learn modular synthesis. I have some programming background and already started learning SuperCollider.
As I would also like something with graphical interface and easy integration with my DAW (I'm on Logic), I'm looking for your recommendation which one (Bidule or Reaktor) is better as a long-term investment of my time spent on learning. I've tried demos of both Bidule (nice, quite intuitive, love the ability to use AU and VST plugins) and Reaktor (I like its GUI, dislike its appetite for CPU power).
Regards,
Adam
-
- KVRAF
- 2462 posts since 15 Apr, 2004 from Capital City, UK
Hi Adam,
Well I thought you would have got a few more responses by now.. so I'll give you my opinion on these things..
I think it entirely depends on what you want to make, how you want to use it and how you want it to look. You spotted one of the BIG things Bidule can do; load VSTs/AUs - and if you want to make environments for modulating your favourite synths and effects, with the potential to write your own effects or synths should you choose to, go Bidule.
If you want access to a library of thousands of other people's (ranging from cruddy to spiffing) synths and effects, which you can then connect any which way you desire, including using the much-loved Blocks (investigate if you need - it's as close to high-level modular synthesis as you'll get in Reaktor) part of Reaktor.
Interesting things about these two products is that one will gon into the other, but not the other way round.. (Reaktor instruments can run in Bidule, but Bidule cannot be loaded into a Reaktor environment)
The GUI in Bidule _will_ get better at some point, we have been promised, and there is a way to make your own GUIs for your Bidule groups/layouts using OSC, but it's fiddly and isn't entirely intuitive. So far, I've been happy enough to make do with the basic GUI stuff Bidule offers.
So, as you can see, it isn't easy - I been using both for around 10-12 years, but I always start with Bidule. It maybe that working from top-down just sits with me a little better than left-to-right (reaktor), but then, if that were true I would be using PD a lot more soo..I dunno. They've both got their uses, and USPs.
I would say this; Bidule integrates, from my perspective, much better into Logic. For example, Bidule appears in the MIDI FX menu, Reaktor does not. However, there are limits when it comes to transmitting MIDI to the various internal Bidule ports - the AU(2?) framework currently only allows for one MIDI route; the new AU3(?) will have more.
That should be enough to start you off.
Click my channel to subscribe!
cheers,
Matthew
Well I thought you would have got a few more responses by now.. so I'll give you my opinion on these things..
I think it entirely depends on what you want to make, how you want to use it and how you want it to look. You spotted one of the BIG things Bidule can do; load VSTs/AUs - and if you want to make environments for modulating your favourite synths and effects, with the potential to write your own effects or synths should you choose to, go Bidule.
If you want access to a library of thousands of other people's (ranging from cruddy to spiffing) synths and effects, which you can then connect any which way you desire, including using the much-loved Blocks (investigate if you need - it's as close to high-level modular synthesis as you'll get in Reaktor) part of Reaktor.
Interesting things about these two products is that one will gon into the other, but not the other way round.. (Reaktor instruments can run in Bidule, but Bidule cannot be loaded into a Reaktor environment)
The GUI in Bidule _will_ get better at some point, we have been promised, and there is a way to make your own GUIs for your Bidule groups/layouts using OSC, but it's fiddly and isn't entirely intuitive. So far, I've been happy enough to make do with the basic GUI stuff Bidule offers.
So, as you can see, it isn't easy - I been using both for around 10-12 years, but I always start with Bidule. It maybe that working from top-down just sits with me a little better than left-to-right (reaktor), but then, if that were true I would be using PD a lot more soo..I dunno. They've both got their uses, and USPs.
I would say this; Bidule integrates, from my perspective, much better into Logic. For example, Bidule appears in the MIDI FX menu, Reaktor does not. However, there are limits when it comes to transmitting MIDI to the various internal Bidule ports - the AU(2?) framework currently only allows for one MIDI route; the new AU3(?) will have more.
That should be enough to start you off.
Click my channel to subscribe!
cheers,
Matthew
-
gentleclockdivider gentleclockdivider https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=203660
- KVRAF
- 6103 posts since 22 Mar, 2009 from gent
Bidule isn't as low level as reaktor core .
Eyeball exchanging
Soul calibrating ..frequencies
Soul calibrating ..frequencies
-
AdamWysokinski AdamWysokinski https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=393916
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 243 posts since 16 Feb, 2017
Thanks for your replies. After having stability problems and several minor glitches with Bidule, I decided to go for Reaktor. Now, back to learning and creating
- Beware the Quoth
- 33156 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
But there is a proper SDK, so you can write your own modules in native code.gentleclockdivider wrote:Bidule isn't as low level as reaktor core .
my other modular synth is a bugbrand
-
- KVRist
- 271 posts since 22 Apr, 2008 from Waltham-st-Lawrence.
- KVRian
- 520 posts since 22 May, 2009 from Portugal,Azores (faial island)
+1 for VCV Rack
...want to know how to program great synth sounds,check my video tutorials: http://www.youtube.com/user/sergiofrias25
- KVRian
- 513 posts since 20 Dec, 2008
Reaktor can be used to make great alternative interfaces for Bidule creations, and plugins hosted in Bidule with Bidule's Parameter Linking/Mapping feature. This is one of my favourite features of Bidule; super quick and useful.
Actually, there are many things I absolutely love about Bidule (It's been my main go-to modular environment for something like 13 years), but I won't go on as it seems you've made your decision.
Actually, there are many things I absolutely love about Bidule (It's been my main go-to modular environment for something like 13 years), but I won't go on as it seems you've made your decision.
-
- KVRAF
- 2462 posts since 15 Apr, 2004 from Capital City, UK
AdamWysokinski wrote:Thanks for your replies. After having stability problems and several minor glitches with Bidule, I decided to go for Reaktor. Now, back to learning and creating
You're probably bored of this topic by now (and deep in NI Core!) but I should mention that the Plogue guys who make Bidule would probably like to hear what instability and glitch issues you had with it. And, to be honest, I'd like to understand what problems you had.
I, like our friend dformd here, have been using Bidule for 12-13 years and consider myself fairly familiar with it's quirks, so I find it hard to understand what a first time user could experience with regard to glitches and instability.
Would you care to touch on these here? The company is itself quite small so they do not have arms reaching regularly into forums like this to resolve customer issues, and if I can prevent another user from turning away from Bidule due to the issues you experienced, then I'm doing my 'job' (I'm not employed by them) at widening the userbase.
Much appreciated
CB
-
- KVRAF
- 15515 posts since 13 Oct, 2009
No, please go into it because I'm still on the fence about Bidule. Tell me more about "parameter linking" and how you create alternative interfaces with Reaktor.dformd wrote:Reaktor can be used to make great alternative interfaces for Bidule creations, and plugins hosted in Bidule with Bidule's Parameter Linking/Mapping feature. This is one of my favourite features of Bidule; super quick and useful.
Actually, there are many things I absolutely love about Bidule (It's been my main go-to modular environment for something like 13 years), but I won't go on as it seems you've made your decision.
-
AdamWysokinski AdamWysokinski https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=393916
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 243 posts since 16 Feb, 2017
Hi,CinningBao wrote:You're probably bored of this topic by now (and deep in NI Core!) but I should mention that the Plogue guys who make Bidule would probably like to hear what instability and glitch issues you had with it. And, to be honest, I'd like to understand what problems you had.AdamWysokinski wrote:Thanks for your replies. After having stability problems and several minor glitches with Bidule, I decided to go for Reaktor. Now, back to learning and creating
Much appreciated
CB
These were quite non-serious problems, but also relatively frequent - mostly GUI glitches of internal modules. Also some crashes, which gave me impression of Bidule being relatively unstable. But I was at OS X High Sierra at that time, so this could be the culprit.
While I decided to focus on Reaktor, I will try Bidule again in the future.
Regards,
Adam
-
AdamWysokinski AdamWysokinski https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=393916
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 243 posts since 16 Feb, 2017
Please go on, I'm open to learn new things I could use Bidue to complement Reaktor ensembles, not as its replacement.dformd wrote:Actually, there are many things I absolutely love about Bidule (It's been my main go-to modular environment for something like 13 years), but I won't go on as it seems you've made your decision.
Adam
- KVRAF
- 8823 posts since 6 Jan, 2017 from Outer Space
No one mentioned Max/MSP or the free Pd yet. Both can be considered as well, unless you want to use them as plug-in...
I integrate Max with Logic or any other DAW by sending audio via my spdif outputs, connected to spdif input on my interface. Or you use soundflower...
I integrate Max with Logic or any other DAW by sending audio via my spdif outputs, connected to spdif input on my interface. Or you use soundflower...
-
gentleclockdivider gentleclockdivider https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=203660
- KVRAF
- 6103 posts since 22 Mar, 2009 from gent
whyterabbyt wrote:But there is a proper SDK, so you can write your own modules in native code.gentleclockdivider wrote:Bidule isn't as low level as reaktor core .
You mean the expression / function bidule etc...?
Eyeball exchanging
Soul calibrating ..frequencies
Soul calibrating ..frequencies
-
- KVRAF
- 2462 posts since 15 Apr, 2004 from Capital City, UK