shouldn't eve have at least 32 voice poly since.............
-
- KVRAF
- 2582 posts since 24 Apr, 2003 from Canada
EVE 2.0 suggestions:
- 4th layer slot!
- Seperate amp and filter ADSR (you could use the filter button as a toggle, so you wouldn't need two different ADSR guis)
- as many filter types as you are willing to add, but even just HP would be nice.
-skinable. EVE has a nice gui, but personally the knobs are not my favorite.
-filter cutoff as a destination for lfos
-lfo sync
-lfo pre-delay time (so you can get a vibrato or sweep that fades in)
-more powerful EQ, adds/subtracts greater dB from the signal.
Thats about all I can think of!
- 4th layer slot!
- Seperate amp and filter ADSR (you could use the filter button as a toggle, so you wouldn't need two different ADSR guis)
- as many filter types as you are willing to add, but even just HP would be nice.
-skinable. EVE has a nice gui, but personally the knobs are not my favorite.
-filter cutoff as a destination for lfos
-lfo sync
-lfo pre-delay time (so you can get a vibrato or sweep that fades in)
-more powerful EQ, adds/subtracts greater dB from the signal.
Thats about all I can think of!
- KVRAF
- 23462 posts since 12 Jul, 2003 from West Caprazumia
have I allready mentioned that a siple limiter would be nice?
"Preamps have literally one job: when you turn up the gain, it gets louder." Jamcat, talking about presmp-emulation plugins.
-
- Banned
- Topic Starter
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
yes. i agree actually.jens wrote:have I allready mentioned that a siple limiter would be nice?
- KVRAF
- 23462 posts since 12 Jul, 2003 from West Caprazumia
to a 'SIMPLE' as well?ttoz wrote:yes. i agree actually.jens wrote:have I allready mentioned that a siple limiter would be nice?
"Preamps have literally one job: when you turn up the gain, it gets louder." Jamcat, talking about presmp-emulation plugins.
-
- KVRAF
- 2582 posts since 24 Apr, 2003 from Canada
yeah a limiter would be a nice addition as well. nice for taming 'spikey' patches
oh, and I forgot one other thing: the ability to make our own .dashsnd files. It doesn't have to be anything fancy, even if it just accepts a txt file (like the new Rhino will) that defines the multisample keyrange and velocity range. Command-line is fine with me, though a gui would be even better.
It would be cool for releasing new userbanks - with uncopyrighted samples of course
oh, and I forgot one other thing: the ability to make our own .dashsnd files. It doesn't have to be anything fancy, even if it just accepts a txt file (like the new Rhino will) that defines the multisample keyrange and velocity range. Command-line is fine with me, though a gui would be even better.
It would be cool for releasing new userbanks - with uncopyrighted samples of course
-
- Banned
- Topic Starter
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
yeah, like the one in zeta on its output. is that what you mean?jens wrote:to a 'SIMPLE' as well?ttoz wrote:yes. i agree actually.jens wrote:have I allready mentioned that a siple limiter would be nice?
- KVRAF
- 23462 posts since 12 Jul, 2003 from West Caprazumia
I don't know - the only RGC products I everttoz wrote:yeah, like the one in zeta on its output. is that what you mean?jens wrote:to a 'SIMPLE' as well?ttoz wrote:yes. i agree actually.jens wrote:have I allready mentioned that a siple limiter would be nice?
bought are Triangle 1&2 (though I am really considering Square1 ) - what I mean is a simple limiter who only gets rid of some spikes as Floyd allready wrote. You can get them with Eve if eg.
you turn up the filter resonace too much and/or make heavy use of the Leslie-sim or the delay...
I guess we're on the same boat here!?
"Preamps have literally one job: when you turn up the gain, it gets louder." Jamcat, talking about presmp-emulation plugins.
- Banned
- 5089 posts since 12 Jun, 2001 from Wusik Dot Com
Guys, I just uploaded to EVE's LOGIN area the BLANK BANK. Just login at http://login.dashsignature.com/ click on "dl.again" next to EVE and you will see the "Blank-Bank.exe" filename...
Wk
Wk
-
- Banned
- Topic Starter
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
ok, so exactly like rgc audios limiter. haven't you tried the demo of zeta yet? come on, you don't know what you are missing! (sorry i know it's an eve thread)jens wrote:I don't know - the only RGC products I everttoz wrote:yeah, like the one in zeta on its output. is that what you mean?jens wrote:to a 'SIMPLE' as well?ttoz wrote:yes. i agree actually.jens wrote:have I allready mentioned that a siple limiter would be nice?
bought are Triangle 1&2 (though I am really considering Square1 ) - what I mean is a simple limiter who only gets rid of some spikes as Floyd allready wrote. You can get them with Eve if eg.
you turn up the filter resonace too much and/or make heavy use of the Leslie-sim or the delay...
I guess we're on the same boat here!?
-
- DASH Guy
- 7951 posts since 20 Sep, 2001
yes it's an EVE thread and you can't pollute it with
CPU hogs VSTs talking!, (he he, kidding)
BTW limiter is approved and I have the code almost ready
CPU hogs VSTs talking!, (he he, kidding)
BTW limiter is approved and I have the code almost ready
-
- Banned
- Topic Starter
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
liqih wrote:
BTW limiter is approved and I have the code almost ready
-
- KVRAF
- 1527 posts since 3 Apr, 2002 from desolation row
we are already talking about EVE 2??
The limiter is a great idea, thanks dash guys for being onto it already! I am also with floyd on a few points-
-seperate adsr for amp and filter- can be a toggle when filter is activated.
-more filter types, HP for starters.
-filter cut-off as LFO destination.
and my own suggestion-
- I would like to see a more fully implemented filter section, per part of course - At least a *dial* each for cut-off and resonance. Those lovely vintage oscillators just beg for it! I think the general consensus is that EVE is CPU friendly at the moment, so I presume most of us would be happy enough to use a bit more CPU as cost for some creamy filters (I hope I don't presume too much).
- I think the three layer slots is definately enough.
The limiter is a great idea, thanks dash guys for being onto it already! I am also with floyd on a few points-
-seperate adsr for amp and filter- can be a toggle when filter is activated.
-more filter types, HP for starters.
-filter cut-off as LFO destination.
and my own suggestion-
- I would like to see a more fully implemented filter section, per part of course - At least a *dial* each for cut-off and resonance. Those lovely vintage oscillators just beg for it! I think the general consensus is that EVE is CPU friendly at the moment, so I presume most of us would be happy enough to use a bit more CPU as cost for some creamy filters (I hope I don't presume too much).
- I think the three layer slots is definately enough.
...