Diva 2 Wishlist (purely hypothetical, nothing in development)

Official support for: u-he.com
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

Just add more modules and sell them separately just like Slate Digital does with their VMR modules

Post

Great points for a possible Diva 2. But my only consearn is that Diva is too CPU-heavy at the moment. Fix that, and it will be the perfect soft synth (and Zebra 2 the runner up).

As we are dreaming; a hardware version of Diva (one knob-per-function) would be a dream, and a best friend to my new Ob-6;-)

Post

onathanj wrote:Great points for a possible Diva 2. But my only consearn is that Diva is too CPU-heavy at the moment. Fix that, and it will be the perfect soft synth (and Zebra 2 the runner up).

As we are dreaming; a hardware version of Diva (one knob-per-function) would be a dream, and a best friend to my new Ob-6;-)
Urs said somewhere, maybe here, that they've gotten a lot better at solving the complex filter math in the five years since the release of Diva. In layman's terms: they could get the same, or higher, quality at much less CPU.

Post

onathanj wrote:Great points for a possible Diva 2. But my only consearn is that Diva is too CPU-heavy at the moment. Fix that, and it will be the perfect soft synth (and Zebra 2 the runner up).
So you have money for Ob-6 but still can't buy $300 hex core i7?
OMG
Murderous duck!

Post

david.beholder wrote:
onathanj wrote:Great points for a possible Diva 2. But my only consearn is that Diva is too CPU-heavy at the moment. Fix that, and it will be the perfect soft synth (and Zebra 2 the runner up).
So you have money for Ob-6 but still can't buy $300 hex core i7?
OMG
Hey, been there myself. Sometimes it's one or the other! Plus that $300 processor, turns into a $150 mobo, then new RAM, might as well get a GPU...

Post

Funkybot's Evil Twin wrote:
david.beholder wrote:
onathanj wrote:Great points for a possible Diva 2. But my only consearn is that Diva is too CPU-heavy at the moment. Fix that, and it will be the perfect soft synth (and Zebra 2 the runner up).
So you have money for Ob-6 but still can't buy $300 hex core i7?
OMG
Hey, been there myself. Sometimes it's one or the other! Plus that $300 processor, turns into a $150 mobo, then new RAM, might as well get a GPU...
Mostly not - there are always several top of the line processor for any socket.

Even following your logic OB-6 requires: stand, wires, outboard fx, expensive sound card etc always more than price which is already high ~$2500-3000.
Last edited by david.beholder on Wed Jan 18, 2017 3:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
Murderous duck!

Post

david.beholder wrote:
Funkybot's Evil Twin wrote:
david.beholder wrote:
onathanj wrote:Great points for a possible Diva 2. But my only consearn is that Diva is too CPU-heavy at the moment. Fix that, and it will be the perfect soft synth (and Zebra 2 the runner up).
So you have money for Ob-6 but still can't buy $300 hex core i7?
OMG
Hey, been there myself. Sometimes it's one or the other! Plus that $300 processor, turns into a $150 mobo, then new RAM, might as well get a GPU...
Mostly not - there are always several top of the line processor for any socket.

Even following your logic OB-6 requires: stand, wires, outboard fx, expensive sound card etc always more than price which is $2500-3000.
Well, to your point, if I just dropped 3k on a synth, maybe I wouldn't be buying anything else for a while.

It's not even my synth, I'm just saying: everyone's in different financial straits and we all have different priorities. If I could afford an OB-6, then I hope I could also afford a house big enough to store all my gear because space is already getting tight in my office/studio. But I'd get the house before the synth, and definitely not both at once.

Who cares if onathan has an awesome synth and a slow PC? Maybe it was one or the other and he just wanted the synth more. Sorry, I've steered this thread further off topic. I'll shut up now. :oops:

Post

Funkybot's Evil Twin wrote: Well, to your point, if I just dropped 3k on a synth, maybe I wouldn't be buying anything else for a while.

It's not even my synth, I'm just saying: everyone's in different financial straits and we all have different priorities. If I could afford an OB-6, then I hope I could also afford a house big enough to store all my gear because space is already getting tight in my office/studio. But I'd get the house before the synth, and definitely not both at once.

Who cares if onathan has an awesome synth and a slow PC? Maybe it was one or the other and he just wanted the synth more. Sorry, I've steered this thread further off topic. I'll shut up now. :oops:
I find it absurd as well.

Buy 3k synth and go complain about Diva CPU consumption instead of buying $300 processor and run 30-40 instances of Diva with no hiccups -- it's like buying sport car and complaining on gas prices/consumption or driving 20 y.o. toyota and complaining about slow acceleration.

If CPU is outdated it's quite stupid to expect it work well with modern plugins.
Murderous duck!

Post

david.beholder wrote:
onathanj wrote:Great points for a possible Diva 2. But my only consearn is that Diva is too CPU-heavy at the moment. Fix that, and it will be the perfect soft synth (and Zebra 2 the runner up).
So you have money for Ob-6 but still can't buy $300 hex core i7?
OMG
It´s only people who haven´t tried a real analog synth with one knob per function that thinks it´s nothing special. In fact, the Ob-6 is a players instrument with instant gratification due to it´s fantastic sweet-spots. A thought trough hardware Diva could also fall into that category.

Since I cannot upgrade my 5.1 mac pro more, the alternative is a new mac pro, and it costs perhaps ten times more than your 300 dollar suggestion. And that, I can´t afford. Especially when my mac works well with every other soft synth. 3-6 instances with Diva is maximum for me.

Post

david.beholder wrote:
Funkybot's Evil Twin wrote: Well, to your point, if I just dropped 3k on a synth, maybe I wouldn't be buying anything else for a while.

It's not even my synth, I'm just saying: everyone's in different financial straits and we all have different priorities. If I could afford an OB-6, then I hope I could also afford a house big enough to store all my gear because space is already getting tight in my office/studio. But I'd get the house before the synth, and definitely not both at once.

Who cares if onathan has an awesome synth and a slow PC? Maybe it was one or the other and he just wanted the synth more. Sorry, I've steered this thread further off topic. I'll shut up now. :oops:
I find it absurd as well.

Buy 3k synth and go complain about Diva CPU consumption instead of buying $300 processor and run 30-40 instances of Diva with no hiccups -- it's like buying sport car and complaining on gas prices/consumption or driving 20 y.o. toyota and complaining about slow acceleration.

If CPU is outdated it's quite stupid to expect it work well with modern plugins.
And the $300 dollar includes all the work I'd have installing all the things I collected over a couple of years, with all that serial number inputting, online activation, configuring, downloading software tools, giving Windows the look and feel I want etc. :P

Sometimes things are not as easy as they seem.

Post

Please not another thread comparing hardware and software. It doesn't matter. This is a diva 2 wishlist thread.

Post

2ZrgE wrote: And the $300 dollar includes all the work I'd have installing all the things I collected over a couple of years, with all that serial number inputting, online activation, configuring, downloading software tools, giving Windows the look and feel I want etc. :P

Sometimes things are not as easy as they seem.
WRONG! Your processor have no id, motherboard/network card does ;) i.e. no reinstallation would be needed at all.
onathanj wrote: It´s only people who haven´t tried a real analog synth with one knob per function...
I have like 10 of them incl. Prophet 6, Dominion 1, Oberheim SEM, still using Diva/Ace in actual production because of sound, scalability, recallability and workflow speed - no hardware piece gives it to me.
onathanj wrote:Since I cannot upgrade my 5.1 mac pro more, the alternative is a new mac pro, and it costs perhaps ten times more than your 300 dollar suggestion. And that, I can´t afford. Especially when my mac works well with every other soft synth. 3-6 instances with Diva is maximum for me.
In the price range of your mac mini I have PC that could run 30-40 U-he plugins and I think I still can upate to octocore - they should be cheap now - 3 years after build.

So it is "your computer suck" not "Diva is cpu hog".
Last edited by david.beholder on Wed Jan 18, 2017 5:48 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Murderous duck!

Post

ARP latch/hold is my #1 wish.

More models would be welcome, prophet, CS80, sh101, steiner-parker, wavetable oscillator...

I would also like an alternative mode for the 2VCO model with variable waveform selector instead of individual switches.
dedication to flying

Post

onathanj wrote:
david.beholder wrote:
onathanj wrote:Great points for a possible Diva 2. But my only consearn is that Diva is too CPU-heavy at the moment. Fix that, and it will be the perfect soft synth (and Zebra 2 the runner up).
So you have money for Ob-6 but still can't buy $300 hex core i7?
OMG
Since I cannot upgrade my 5.1 mac pro more, the alternative is a new mac pro, and it costs perhaps ten times more than your 300 dollar suggestion. And that, I can´t afford. Especially when my mac works well with every other soft synth. 3-6 instances with Diva is maximum for me.
Assuming you're on Logic Pro X then? Have you tried utilizing Track Freeze?

Post

Freezing track is possible on every great daw today but its not ideal for my workflow even if I use it when I have to. I normally use Diva in draft mode to use more instances, and I wish it would be enough but it´s not ;-)

But back to topic, the heavy cpu-usage of Diva is still the only complaints people have as far as I´we seen among forums and musician friends. And thats from people who use great processors aswell. Not everyone make simple edm-ish music with a few synth instances per song. So improved cpu usage would be mostly welcome!

The only other wish is perhaps variable oscillators, a few more modifications (like 2 more add and multiply) and a shimmer effect;-)

Post Reply

Return to “u-he”