Diva 2 Wishlist (purely hypothetical, nothing in development)
-
- KVRer
- 25 posts since 22 Nov, 2014
Great points for a possible Diva 2. But my only consearn is that Diva is too CPU-heavy at the moment. Fix that, and it will be the perfect soft synth (and Zebra 2 the runner up).
As we are dreaming; a hardware version of Diva (one knob-per-function) would be a dream, and a best friend to my new Ob-6;-)
As we are dreaming; a hardware version of Diva (one knob-per-function) would be a dream, and a best friend to my new Ob-6;-)
-
Funkybot's Evil Twin Funkybot's Evil Twin https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=116627
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 11519 posts since 16 Aug, 2006
Urs said somewhere, maybe here, that they've gotten a lot better at solving the complex filter math in the five years since the release of Diva. In layman's terms: they could get the same, or higher, quality at much less CPU.onathanj wrote:Great points for a possible Diva 2. But my only consearn is that Diva is too CPU-heavy at the moment. Fix that, and it will be the perfect soft synth (and Zebra 2 the runner up).
As we are dreaming; a hardware version of Diva (one knob-per-function) would be a dream, and a best friend to my new Ob-6;-)
-
david.beholder david.beholder https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=159839
- KVRAF
- 1866 posts since 13 Sep, 2007
So you have money for Ob-6 but still can't buy $300 hex core i7?onathanj wrote:Great points for a possible Diva 2. But my only consearn is that Diva is too CPU-heavy at the moment. Fix that, and it will be the perfect soft synth (and Zebra 2 the runner up).
OMG
Murderous duck!
-
Funkybot's Evil Twin Funkybot's Evil Twin https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=116627
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 11519 posts since 16 Aug, 2006
Hey, been there myself. Sometimes it's one or the other! Plus that $300 processor, turns into a $150 mobo, then new RAM, might as well get a GPU...david.beholder wrote:So you have money for Ob-6 but still can't buy $300 hex core i7?onathanj wrote:Great points for a possible Diva 2. But my only consearn is that Diva is too CPU-heavy at the moment. Fix that, and it will be the perfect soft synth (and Zebra 2 the runner up).
OMG
-
david.beholder david.beholder https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=159839
- KVRAF
- 1866 posts since 13 Sep, 2007
Mostly not - there are always several top of the line processor for any socket.Funkybot's Evil Twin wrote:Hey, been there myself. Sometimes it's one or the other! Plus that $300 processor, turns into a $150 mobo, then new RAM, might as well get a GPU...david.beholder wrote:So you have money for Ob-6 but still can't buy $300 hex core i7?onathanj wrote:Great points for a possible Diva 2. But my only consearn is that Diva is too CPU-heavy at the moment. Fix that, and it will be the perfect soft synth (and Zebra 2 the runner up).
OMG
Even following your logic OB-6 requires: stand, wires, outboard fx, expensive sound card etc always more than price which is already high ~$2500-3000.
Last edited by david.beholder on Wed Jan 18, 2017 3:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
Murderous duck!
-
Funkybot's Evil Twin Funkybot's Evil Twin https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=116627
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 11519 posts since 16 Aug, 2006
Well, to your point, if I just dropped 3k on a synth, maybe I wouldn't be buying anything else for a while.david.beholder wrote:Mostly not - there are always several top of the line processor for any socket.Funkybot's Evil Twin wrote:Hey, been there myself. Sometimes it's one or the other! Plus that $300 processor, turns into a $150 mobo, then new RAM, might as well get a GPU...david.beholder wrote:So you have money for Ob-6 but still can't buy $300 hex core i7?onathanj wrote:Great points for a possible Diva 2. But my only consearn is that Diva is too CPU-heavy at the moment. Fix that, and it will be the perfect soft synth (and Zebra 2 the runner up).
OMG
Even following your logic OB-6 requires: stand, wires, outboard fx, expensive sound card etc always more than price which is $2500-3000.
It's not even my synth, I'm just saying: everyone's in different financial straits and we all have different priorities. If I could afford an OB-6, then I hope I could also afford a house big enough to store all my gear because space is already getting tight in my office/studio. But I'd get the house before the synth, and definitely not both at once.
Who cares if onathan has an awesome synth and a slow PC? Maybe it was one or the other and he just wanted the synth more. Sorry, I've steered this thread further off topic. I'll shut up now.
-
david.beholder david.beholder https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=159839
- KVRAF
- 1866 posts since 13 Sep, 2007
I find it absurd as well.Funkybot's Evil Twin wrote: Well, to your point, if I just dropped 3k on a synth, maybe I wouldn't be buying anything else for a while.
It's not even my synth, I'm just saying: everyone's in different financial straits and we all have different priorities. If I could afford an OB-6, then I hope I could also afford a house big enough to store all my gear because space is already getting tight in my office/studio. But I'd get the house before the synth, and definitely not both at once.
Who cares if onathan has an awesome synth and a slow PC? Maybe it was one or the other and he just wanted the synth more. Sorry, I've steered this thread further off topic. I'll shut up now.
Buy 3k synth and go complain about Diva CPU consumption instead of buying $300 processor and run 30-40 instances of Diva with no hiccups -- it's like buying sport car and complaining on gas prices/consumption or driving 20 y.o. toyota and complaining about slow acceleration.
If CPU is outdated it's quite stupid to expect it work well with modern plugins.
Murderous duck!
-
- KVRer
- 25 posts since 22 Nov, 2014
It´s only people who haven´t tried a real analog synth with one knob per function that thinks it´s nothing special. In fact, the Ob-6 is a players instrument with instant gratification due to it´s fantastic sweet-spots. A thought trough hardware Diva could also fall into that category.david.beholder wrote:So you have money for Ob-6 but still can't buy $300 hex core i7?onathanj wrote:Great points for a possible Diva 2. But my only consearn is that Diva is too CPU-heavy at the moment. Fix that, and it will be the perfect soft synth (and Zebra 2 the runner up).
OMG
Since I cannot upgrade my 5.1 mac pro more, the alternative is a new mac pro, and it costs perhaps ten times more than your 300 dollar suggestion. And that, I can´t afford. Especially when my mac works well with every other soft synth. 3-6 instances with Diva is maximum for me.
-
- KVRian
- 1351 posts since 30 Mar, 2011
And the $300 dollar includes all the work I'd have installing all the things I collected over a couple of years, with all that serial number inputting, online activation, configuring, downloading software tools, giving Windows the look and feel I want etc.david.beholder wrote:I find it absurd as well.Funkybot's Evil Twin wrote: Well, to your point, if I just dropped 3k on a synth, maybe I wouldn't be buying anything else for a while.
It's not even my synth, I'm just saying: everyone's in different financial straits and we all have different priorities. If I could afford an OB-6, then I hope I could also afford a house big enough to store all my gear because space is already getting tight in my office/studio. But I'd get the house before the synth, and definitely not both at once.
Who cares if onathan has an awesome synth and a slow PC? Maybe it was one or the other and he just wanted the synth more. Sorry, I've steered this thread further off topic. I'll shut up now.
Buy 3k synth and go complain about Diva CPU consumption instead of buying $300 processor and run 30-40 instances of Diva with no hiccups -- it's like buying sport car and complaining on gas prices/consumption or driving 20 y.o. toyota and complaining about slow acceleration.
If CPU is outdated it's quite stupid to expect it work well with modern plugins.
Sometimes things are not as easy as they seem.
-
- KVRist
- 53 posts since 19 Dec, 2015
Please not another thread comparing hardware and software. It doesn't matter. This is a diva 2 wishlist thread.
-
david.beholder david.beholder https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=159839
- KVRAF
- 1866 posts since 13 Sep, 2007
WRONG! Your processor have no id, motherboard/network card does i.e. no reinstallation would be needed at all.2ZrgE wrote: And the $300 dollar includes all the work I'd have installing all the things I collected over a couple of years, with all that serial number inputting, online activation, configuring, downloading software tools, giving Windows the look and feel I want etc.
Sometimes things are not as easy as they seem.
I have like 10 of them incl. Prophet 6, Dominion 1, Oberheim SEM, still using Diva/Ace in actual production because of sound, scalability, recallability and workflow speed - no hardware piece gives it to me.onathanj wrote: It´s only people who haven´t tried a real analog synth with one knob per function...
In the price range of your mac mini I have PC that could run 30-40 U-he plugins and I think I still can upate to octocore - they should be cheap now - 3 years after build.onathanj wrote:Since I cannot upgrade my 5.1 mac pro more, the alternative is a new mac pro, and it costs perhaps ten times more than your 300 dollar suggestion. And that, I can´t afford. Especially when my mac works well with every other soft synth. 3-6 instances with Diva is maximum for me.
So it is "your computer suck" not "Diva is cpu hog".
Last edited by david.beholder on Wed Jan 18, 2017 5:48 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Murderous duck!
- KVRAF
- 3897 posts since 28 Jan, 2011 from MEXICO
ARP latch/hold is my #1 wish.
More models would be welcome, prophet, CS80, sh101, steiner-parker, wavetable oscillator...
I would also like an alternative mode for the 2VCO model with variable waveform selector instead of individual switches.
More models would be welcome, prophet, CS80, sh101, steiner-parker, wavetable oscillator...
I would also like an alternative mode for the 2VCO model with variable waveform selector instead of individual switches.
dedication to flying
- KVRian
- 736 posts since 29 Nov, 2015
Assuming you're on Logic Pro X then? Have you tried utilizing Track Freeze?onathanj wrote:Since I cannot upgrade my 5.1 mac pro more, the alternative is a new mac pro, and it costs perhaps ten times more than your 300 dollar suggestion. And that, I can´t afford. Especially when my mac works well with every other soft synth. 3-6 instances with Diva is maximum for me.david.beholder wrote:So you have money for Ob-6 but still can't buy $300 hex core i7?onathanj wrote:Great points for a possible Diva 2. But my only consearn is that Diva is too CPU-heavy at the moment. Fix that, and it will be the perfect soft synth (and Zebra 2 the runner up).
OMG
-
- KVRer
- 25 posts since 22 Nov, 2014
Freezing track is possible on every great daw today but its not ideal for my workflow even if I use it when I have to. I normally use Diva in draft mode to use more instances, and I wish it would be enough but it´s not
But back to topic, the heavy cpu-usage of Diva is still the only complaints people have as far as I´we seen among forums and musician friends. And thats from people who use great processors aswell. Not everyone make simple edm-ish music with a few synth instances per song. So improved cpu usage would be mostly welcome!
The only other wish is perhaps variable oscillators, a few more modifications (like 2 more add and multiply) and a shimmer effect;-)
But back to topic, the heavy cpu-usage of Diva is still the only complaints people have as far as I´we seen among forums and musician friends. And thats from people who use great processors aswell. Not everyone make simple edm-ish music with a few synth instances per song. So improved cpu usage would be mostly welcome!
The only other wish is perhaps variable oscillators, a few more modifications (like 2 more add and multiply) and a shimmer effect;-)