What I was wondering is what is more efficient - oversampling or a better transform of equal quality.Miles1981 wrote:No, it's not the only waymonsterbeetle wrote:But when you say digital filter alias the high end, isn't over sampling (192kHz) the simplest and only answer to that?
...
You can make your own transform to bridge the gap, it's only a matter of precision used.
Best regards,
Dr Sync