MIDI Files legality
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1010 posts since 20 Jan, 2008
Hey,
I found a midi file of Britney Spears' "Toxic" online, and I was wondering if it is illegal to distribute these. I have no idea if this is an "official" midi - but it's just a straight-up .mid file with no samples or instruments whatsoever. I wouldn't be using melodies or rhythms from this for my own songs, but it's interesting to see how these types of songs are put together.
So is this technically illegal?
Thanks
~Ryan
I found a midi file of Britney Spears' "Toxic" online, and I was wondering if it is illegal to distribute these. I have no idea if this is an "official" midi - but it's just a straight-up .mid file with no samples or instruments whatsoever. I wouldn't be using melodies or rhythms from this for my own songs, but it's interesting to see how these types of songs are put together.
So is this technically illegal?
Thanks
~Ryan
- KVRAF
- 15273 posts since 8 Mar, 2005 from Utrecht, Holland
For you it IS illegal to distribute it. For the original site you got it from: it depends... It can be done totally legal afaik, if they bothered to go that route.RyanG wrote:I found a midi file of Britney Spears' "Toxic" online, and I was wondering if it is illegal to distribute these. [...]
So is this technically illegal?
We are the KVR collective. Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.
My MusicCalc is served over https!!
My MusicCalc is served over https!!
-
- KVRAF
- 6111 posts since 18 Oct, 2007
- KVRAF
- 15273 posts since 8 Mar, 2005 from Utrecht, Holland
Correct. But they may be published in another form, when all parties have agreed upon that. The legality of a midi file is the same as that of any cover version produced as regular audio.derival wrote:Melodies are protected by copyright
So it's not always illegal. There are many legit midi file shops around. For example: http://www.tmfonline.com and their copyrights info page is http://www.tmfonline.com/eng/Privacy/
We are the KVR collective. Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.
My MusicCalc is served over https!!
My MusicCalc is served over https!!
-
- KVRAF
- 2901 posts since 26 Jul, 2005 from dun unda
The whole issue with derived works and sequences is still a massive gray area. Especially since the majority of these MIDI's are compiled and sold into MIDI Karaoke DVD's in Asian countries with 10000+ songs to choose from...it makes you wonder.
Then again, at the most instances these aren't created by the official producers (with few exceptions but are usually recorded as sequential audio of some type, Guitar Hero?) Then there's the ringtone business, where the mobile companies are making loads from that franchise alone. Heck, some of them are in fact illegal if not are simply selling MIDI's downloaded straight from websites that provide it for free. (In the case of video game music sequences at vgmusic.com, some cases had been reported...)
In short, the market is so big, it's techically illegal since stealing melodies is obviously a big deal with these big money f**ks, yet so many songs use the same damned chord progression if not melody as well anyway? What's the diff?
Also, in most cases when people transcribe music in such a fashion like this, I've even seen people sell unauthorized instrumentals. How come there's no court cases for that?
PS: Remember. Timbaland is a poser as well. Taking a sequence that isn't his and selling it through his own music.
Then again, at the most instances these aren't created by the official producers (with few exceptions but are usually recorded as sequential audio of some type, Guitar Hero?) Then there's the ringtone business, where the mobile companies are making loads from that franchise alone. Heck, some of them are in fact illegal if not are simply selling MIDI's downloaded straight from websites that provide it for free. (In the case of video game music sequences at vgmusic.com, some cases had been reported...)
In short, the market is so big, it's techically illegal since stealing melodies is obviously a big deal with these big money f**ks, yet so many songs use the same damned chord progression if not melody as well anyway? What's the diff?
Also, in most cases when people transcribe music in such a fashion like this, I've even seen people sell unauthorized instrumentals. How come there's no court cases for that?
PS: Remember. Timbaland is a poser as well. Taking a sequence that isn't his and selling it through his own music.
-
- KVRist
- 31 posts since 18 Nov, 2007
no it's not, unless you are using it for non comercial use!
- KVRAF
- 15273 posts since 8 Mar, 2005 from Utrecht, Holland
But the same applies to any compact disk or mp3 or iTune you buy... It's all stated in the fine print. Lending, hiring, broadcasting, public performance etc etc prohibited.nesvarbu02 wrote:no it's not, unless you are using it for non comercial use!
We are the KVR collective. Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.
My MusicCalc is served over https!!
My MusicCalc is served over https!!
-
- KVRAF
- 2901 posts since 26 Jul, 2005 from dun unda
In Yamaha MySound (www.mysound.jp), a Japanese music distribution site on the vein of Myspace, allows the uploading of cover versions of music whether it be audio or MIDI, and allows for stream playback but will not allow actual file download on the user-end. (Original material I think the user gets to decide, or is allowed otherwise.) The rumor is, Yamaha will pay for royalties for cover version transcriptions uploaded onto their service.