just a little up the thread. try this link anyway.EJo wrote: When will we find out what he first posted?
http://www.bigtone.de/files/long_reverb.mp3
just a little up the thread. try this link anyway.EJo wrote: When will we find out what he first posted?
Well it's kind of apples and oranges, isn't it? The density and blend is there on both, while broks verb does the roomyness thing brilliantly (which I didn't attempt to copy), the CSR plate is more a "fairydust forest" wide image (a reverb/fx type thing).ttoz wrote:Kingston, I appreciate the demo, but it's not even CLOSE to what Reg had originally posted. it's interesting. I mean one sounds decent enough(csr) then you hear the other and it places them in a different stratosphere, seriously. the csr is not even close. reg, i think you missed my question, what verb IS it? (the gorgeous one I commented about earlier).
I agree! Since CSR should be one of the best native reverbs, the difference is so HUGE, this cannot be a native reverb. Sounds more like one of the high end hardware verbs.Kingston wrote:has to be said though,
those original demos you posted.. that's a damn good reverb, whatever it is! It simply cannot be anything native, or impulses. CSR can only barely match that density and spread.
quite nice, better than csr, not as good as mystery reverb Reg used.martian wrote:ok, i've had a quick attempt to emulate the long reverb reg posted with something.
http://www.yourfilelink.com/get.php?fid=73968
(wav 4.9mb)
let me know what you think.
EJo wrote:I'm just waiting for him to say it's Freeverb on his own secret setting or something.ttoz wrote:Well if Reg turns around and says it's AAR or R66 I will be blown away.
/J
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2024
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement