kmonkey wrote:I am very sorry if it came up that way. I was under impression i was clear when i said that i understand feeling with people which want different gui. Beside that in past i did something similar even worse i patronized developers for changing their interfaces...but my opinion did not matter to them because there were thousands of people which liked changes being made.
Ok so now when you bit me can i say same thing?
We who appreciate how it sounds and also how it looks in V4 would like express certain advantages of V4 graphical interface and we would not want it to change because 3-4 users want it so.
You surely don't expect that by repeating you don't like how it looks in V4 company will change their strategy (which people like) made long time before? If you do then it's imho trolling and self entitlement. But..i know you are not trolling.
Which now return to what i said earlier: these days there's everything for everyone. If users don't like it they should pass on it. If users came to this hobby or business for how it looks then imho they are in the wrong position (my maybe absurd but practical point of view).
Sorry if I misunderstood you. However, you are still really misunderstanding me
I'm not patronising anyone. I absolutely respect this developer, the way he does business etc. and it is not a sign of disrespect to offer suggestions.kmonkey wrote:i did something similar even worse i patronized developers for changing their interfaces.
Like I said, I also see advantages. You really seem to not be grasping that I think that it is just a case of going too far towards minimal design, and sacrificing a little usability along the way.kmonkey wrote:We who appreciate how it sounds and also how it looks in V4 would like express certain advantages of V4 graphical interface and we would not want it to change because 3-4 users want it so.
You have no idea what my suggestions might be, and yet you are already digging your heels in and telling me that you don't want any changes.
Focus groups and market research sessions are an extremely important part of a company's (at least those who are even slightly forward-thinking) process, to market. Companies can often drastically reshape their process on the opinion of current (or prospective) markets. And if you've paid any attention here at KVR, you'll also be aware that many developers make often huge, manifold, changes to their products in response to feedback.kmonkey wrote:You surely don't expect that by repeating you don't like how it looks in V4 company will change their strategy (which people like) made long time before? If you do then it's imho trolling and self entitlement
I think you do Jeroen a huge disservice by telling his prospective customers that if they don't like it they should look elsewhere.kmonkey wrote:Which now return to what i said earlier: these days there's everything for everyone. If users don't like it they should pass on it.
Clearly people love his tools. They are just hoping for some possible small changes to make them perfect.
kmonkey wrote:If users came to this hobby or business for how it looks then imho they are in the wrong position
