so you're back to where you started, even though i've provided Sascha's quotes that pretty much say the exact opposite of what you just said.jens wrote:Straight to the point: I think he meant that the best digital tape emulation is objectively superior - as a tool - to a tape simulation that does not (more or less) perfectly emulate all the complex systematically intrinsic idiocracies of tape
that you have pulled out of thin air. in fact, one of the other posters have taken issue with that, and Sascha have specifically addressed this point and said that he did not say this nor does he think so, yet you still claim he does.jens wrote:and also objectively superior to no tape emulation at all (i.e. pure digital).
i've quoted you the exact wording and explained why i think i am correct in interpreting what he meant. you, on the other hand, did quote him, but did so in a way that removed much of the context in which he said what he said, thereby making your interpretation "quote mining".jens wrote:I am not arguing for the sake fo it but because that - hand on heart - is how I interpret his posts and while I can not be perfectly sure (because they are ambigious, purposely or not) personally I am convinced that is what he meant. Unlike you I am not saying everyone interpreting it differently than me is wrong.
well, it's a good thing that i've sold all u-he plugins then (Satin included).jens wrote:As a sidenote: I really DO find you U-He followers seriously irritating (to say the least)and it is one thing that really puts me off (I am not saying this to stir the pot but because it is true).
