POLL: Which DAW would you choose if all things were equal?
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 887 posts since 12 Jan, 2011
What I mean by "all things equal" is . . . same cost (lets say $100), cross-platform (PC/Mac/Linux), and you have ZERO prior experience/investment with any any of them (but you do have your eMusic experience/not a total beginner).
1. Vote/Choose (two per for those conflicted, and you can change your vote)
2. Please explain your reason. Why?
1. Vote/Choose (two per for those conflicted, and you can change your vote)
2. Please explain your reason. Why?
- Banned
- 1376 posts since 23 Jun, 2007 from france
-
thecontrolcentre thecontrolcentre https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=76240
- KVRAF
- 35173 posts since 27 Jul, 2005 from the wilds of wanny
- KVRAF
- 1644 posts since 8 Feb, 2013 from Switzerland
Logic Pro X. I'm an acoustic/electric guitar player. I appreciate the old-school linear approach like a tape machine for audio and the advanced MIDI handling for some backing tracks. Best of both worlds so to speak for me.
-
- KVRAF
- 2590 posts since 19 Mar, 2008 from germany
I would analyze all DAWs. The main points were 1. Features and
2. Ergonomy. And finally the top dog is:
Apple Logic Pro X
Why?
It really has all features you can guess or you've ever heard of.
And you can create a marvellous super fast workflow. In the early
2000s Logic had already most of the features which are now
implemented into other DAWs - in painful development. Also
the folder-structure enables you to use Logic in a linear way
(old tape-machine-procedure) or in a pattern-based way (for
electronic guys).
But ... there is one disadvantage: Logic comes with the biggest
dongle you can imagine: The whole Mac is the dongle! And
you are forced to buy a new dongle every two years if you
wanna be up to date.
free mp3s + info: andy-enroe.de songs + weird stuff: enroe.de
-
- KVRian
- 652 posts since 2 Nov, 2014
Why change every two years?enroe wrote: ↑Mon Feb 18, 2019 8:37 pmI would analyze all DAWs. The main points were 1. Features and
2. Ergonomy. And finally the top dog is:
Apple Logic Pro X
Why?
It really has all features you can guess or you've ever heard of.
And you can create a marvellous super fast workflow. In the early
2000s Logic had already most of the features which are now
implemented into other DAWs - in painful development. Also
the folder-structure enables you to use Logic in a linear way
(old tape-machine-procedure) or in a pattern-based way (for
electronic guys).
But ... there is one disadvantage: Logic comes with the biggest
dongle you can imagine: The whole Mac is the dongle! And
you are forced to buy a new dongle every two years if you
wanna be up to date.
I have a 2013 Mac Pro and everything still runs great like day one with all the latest software.
- KVRAF
- 25053 posts since 20 Oct, 2007 from gonesville
I have major reasons for not choosing Logic, features... so it's not as full-featured per se as is sometimes stated in threads like this.
1) multiple control lanes in one window in a key editor
You are faced with these sorts of workarounds:
https://ask.audio/articles/why-how-to-v ... ogic-pro-x
As opposed to:
1) multiple control lanes in one window in a key editor
You are faced with these sorts of workarounds:
https://ask.audio/articles/why-how-to-v ... ogic-pro-x
As opposed to:
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- KVRAF
- 2590 posts since 19 Mar, 2008 from germany
You lucky one, you!
Yeah, stay with what works for you!
free mp3s + info: andy-enroe.de songs + weird stuff: enroe.de
-
- KVRAF
- 2590 posts since 19 Mar, 2008 from germany
Yeah, there may be edges - but they're really minor.
In this case you can easily open more than one key-editor,
synchronize them and save them as a screenset - and that's it.
free mp3s + info: andy-enroe.de songs + weird stuff: enroe.de
- KVRAF
- 25053 posts since 20 Oct, 2007 from gonesville
Another reason for me is Note Expression. Bitwig apparently does it (found that out here) but I've also seen it reported that it doesn't support changing time signatures.
Not sure how true the latter is but I'm not needing to know. A full demo is not provided anyway.
This may be illustrated in a picture: here the Note Expression window for one note in the part is revealed. The control lanes for the part are as well, so you can see the graphical difference, and outside of N.E. it applies to all of the notes in the part simultaneously anyway. Also the data may be stretched in a much more useful way in N.E., stretching, flattening or expanding the relationship of the data selected. Which are doable but more restricted in the lane for some reason.
Not sure how true the latter is but I'm not needing to know. A full demo is not provided anyway.
This may be illustrated in a picture: here the Note Expression window for one note in the part is revealed. The control lanes for the part are as well, so you can see the graphical difference, and outside of N.E. it applies to all of the notes in the part simultaneously anyway. Also the data may be stretched in a much more useful way in N.E., stretching, flattening or expanding the relationship of the data selected. Which are doable but more restricted in the lane for some reason.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by jancivil on Mon Feb 18, 2019 9:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- KVRAF
- 25053 posts since 20 Oct, 2007 from gonesville
I'm not going to argue what works for you but not for me (*workarounds*), there is no upside to it. I said in one window, meaning with the piano roll (and not more) which I showed the depiction of, and that's that.
Vs, eg:
I prefer not, it's as simple as that.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- KVRAF
- 25053 posts since 20 Oct, 2007 from gonesville
Then, there's this. teh Evil Dragon showed that REAPER can haz as well. Samplitude does this.'
Has to have this feature for me:
https://youtu.be/lZfQtgZBtwA
Moving points in the timeline but the tracks remain stationary.
Has to have this feature for me:
https://youtu.be/lZfQtgZBtwA
Moving points in the timeline but the tracks remain stationary.