How is VST automation in Cubase nowadays?
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3980 posts since 20 Feb, 2004
I think I remember it used to have accuracy issues, with accuracy decreasing with larger (slower) soundcard buffer size.
Anyone with experience of Cubase 9.5-10.5 have an opinion here?
Anyone with experience of Cubase 9.5-10.5 have an opinion here?
A well-behaved signature.
-
- KVRAF
- 2989 posts since 5 Nov, 2014
It's still there unfortunately, I still can't believe that to this day DAW's like Logic and Cubase have so screwed up automation.
Than there's more stuff, people can talk shit about Pro Tools and Reaper for days, but they nailed it and now can move on and develop further:
https://www.admiralbumblebee.com/music/ ... iffer.html
Than there's more stuff, people can talk shit about Pro Tools and Reaper for days, but they nailed it and now can move on and develop further:
https://www.admiralbumblebee.com/music/ ... iffer.html
-
Winstontaneous Winstontaneous https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=98336
- KVRAF
- 2351 posts since 15 Feb, 2006 from Berkeley, CA
Maybe Cubase's makers should reach out to the creator of the VST spec to fix it.
Ridiculous, just like Logic is the least stable AU host...shoemaker's kids and all that.
Ridiculous, just like Logic is the least stable AU host...shoemaker's kids and all that.
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3980 posts since 20 Feb, 2004
Well, that's unfortunate. Really excited Cubase finally got curved automation, and now sobered a bit to learn it still has that nonsense.Passing Bye wrote: ↑Sun Jul 05, 2020 8:05 pm It's still there unfortunately, I still can't believe that to this day DAW's like Logic and Cubase have so screwed up automation.
Than there's more stuff, people can talk shit about Pro Tools and Reaper for days, but they nailed it and now can move on and develop further:
https://www.admiralbumblebee.com/music/ ... iffer.html
A well-behaved signature.
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3980 posts since 20 Feb, 2004
Reaper's automation is pretty solid, then? I remember hearing something like that in the past but was so put off by the UI that I never experiemented with Reaper that much.Passing Bye wrote: ↑Sun Jul 05, 2020 8:05 pmThan there's more stuff, people can talk shit about Pro Tools and Reaper for days, but they nailed it and now can move on and develop further.
A well-behaved signature.
- KVRAF
- 25053 posts since 20 Oct, 2007 from gonesville
“Logic Pro is by far the worst, and audibly so!”
later:
“Logic aced it, mostly. I tried every combination of buffer sizes, process buffer ranges, real/offline…
BUT ONLY WITH SAMPLE ACCURATE AUTOMATION ON!”
I’ve seen enough.
later:
“Logic aced it, mostly. I tried every combination of buffer sizes, process buffer ranges, real/offline…
BUT ONLY WITH SAMPLE ACCURATE AUTOMATION ON!”
I’ve seen enough.
Last edited by jancivil on Sun Jul 05, 2020 10:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRAF
- 2549 posts since 13 Mar, 2004
So that would be Steinberg reaching out to Steinberg.Winstontaneous wrote: ↑Sun Jul 05, 2020 8:58 pm Maybe Cubase's makers should reach out to the creator of the VST spec to fix it.
More seriously, the VST3 specs allow sample accurate automation.
-
- KVRAF
- 2989 posts since 5 Nov, 2014
It's still there unfortunately, guess most people just don't change buffers that often when they have lot off automation going on, so it's kinda mostly non issue for Steinberg and their loyal user base.
Yeah, I left you link where member from here is putting plenty of DAW's for few phases of testing and Reaper is always on top and spot on, but again, if you can't work with it, it doesn't mater that much.Reaper's automation is pretty solid, then? I remember hearing something like that in the past but was so put off by the UI that I never experiemented with Reaper that much.
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3980 posts since 20 Feb, 2004
Yeah, thanks for the link, that was helpful. I saw that FlStudio did well in some aspects, maybe I'll dig that out again (since I have a perpetual license and everything )Passing Bye wrote: ↑Mon Jul 06, 2020 9:12 amIt's still there unfortunately, guess most people just don't change buffers that often when they have lot off automation going on, so it's kinda mostly non issue for Steinberg and their loyal user base.
Yeah, I left you link where member from here is putting plenty of DAW's for few phases of testing and Reaper is always on top and spot on, but again, if you can't work with it, it doesn't mater that much.Reaper's automation is pretty solid, then? I remember hearing something like that in the past but was so put off by the UI that I never experiemented with Reaper that much.
A well-behaved signature.
- KVRAF
- 1560 posts since 3 Jan, 2019 from Holland
-
- KVRian
- 729 posts since 3 May, 2018
Some VSTS within Cubase yes. However not the DAW itself (like any of the controls on the left, you have to manually build your controller hotkeys).
For instance, I want to assign midi learn to the EQ buttons for sweeps. In 10 you can't. Can you in 10.5?
Have you tried Vital?
- KVRAF
- 1560 posts since 3 Jan, 2019 from Holland
No problem in 10, or older versions. Just use Track Quick Controls. It's been around for ages.
More BPM please
-
- KVRian
- 729 posts since 3 May, 2018
Yes quick controls suck, borderline useless.dionenoid wrote: ↑Tue Jul 07, 2020 3:41 pmNo problem in 10, or older versions. Just use Track Quick Controls. It's been around for ages.
Have you tried Vital?
- KVRAF
- 1560 posts since 3 Jan, 2019 from Holland
Psuper wrote: ↑Tue Jul 07, 2020 3:46 pmYes quick controls suck, borderline useless.dionenoid wrote: ↑Tue Jul 07, 2020 3:41 pmNo problem in 10, or older versions. Just use Track Quick Controls. It's been around for ages.
RTFM dude. But stop whining about things you clearly know nothing about.
More BPM please