Best workhorse EQ
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 35 posts since 20 Apr, 2020
What are your go to EQ plugins? If you could only use one EQ plugin what would it be?
I'm loving TDR Slick EQ M and Parametric EQ 2, very interested in getting the Pro Q 3.
I'm loving TDR Slick EQ M and Parametric EQ 2, very interested in getting the Pro Q 3.
-
mike_the_ranger mike_the_ranger https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=393922
- KVRist
- 262 posts since 16 Feb, 2017
ProQ3 for sure as a mix of static & dynamic eq in one plugin. It's used on every single mixer track here in every single project. Right behind are the tonenboosters EQ and the HOFA EQ as a "more advanced" dynamic eq.
- KVRian
- 709 posts since 20 Nov, 2000 from Valencia, Spain
I algo got the TDR SlickEQ M, but I'm really more comfortable working with the TDR Nova as my go-to EQ for tracks.
-
- KVRian
- 692 posts since 24 Sep, 2016
My current favorites are Digital EQ in Falcon and ReEQ for Reaper
SoundCloud
"I believe every music producer inherently has something unique about the way they make music. They just have to identify what makes them different, and develop it" - Max Martin
"I believe every music producer inherently has something unique about the way they make music. They just have to identify what makes them different, and develop it" - Max Martin
- KVRian
- 1280 posts since 26 Mar, 2004 from UK
ProQ is a little too $$$ for my wallet; for the budget conscious, Toneboosters EQ4 is fantastic value for its capabilities; all TB stuff is ridiculously good value and very highly regarded among the community.
ABLETON LIVE 12 & PUSH2
Soundcloud: Nation of Korea vs Shitty Dog
Soundcloud: Nation of Korea vs Shitty Dog
- KVRAF
- 7747 posts since 13 Jan, 2003 from Darkest Kent, UK
I could easily just use reaeq but like ddmfs iieq too, the free version from soundbytes is great, just missing a few band etc.
-
- KVRAF
- 2063 posts since 14 Sep, 2004 from $HOME
I could absolutely get by with what Cubase provides: the channel EQ for common tasks and Frequency for advanced stuff.
That being said, I prefer Tonebooster’s EQ4 for workflow reasons and dynamic EQ. Tried ProQ but I didn’t feel the difference in price - more than 100 bucks - was worth it (that “grab the resonance” feature was nice, though...)
That being said, I prefer Tonebooster’s EQ4 for workflow reasons and dynamic EQ. Tried ProQ but I didn’t feel the difference in price - more than 100 bucks - was worth it (that “grab the resonance” feature was nice, though...)
-
- KVRAF
- 35434 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
That's a great point actually. In Studio One, the EQ integrates itself into the send FX dialog, so that you have a visible display there, without opening the EQ's GUI, and you can adjust the nodes there. Cubase has something similar in the channel settings.
TBH, I never saw the need for a third party EQ, but, YMMV.
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 35 posts since 20 Apr, 2020
Toneboosters Equalizer 4 seems awesome but do you guys think its worth buying if I have the TDR Nova GE?
-
- KVRAF
- 2063 posts since 14 Sep, 2004 from $HOME
Nova is a parallel EQ, E4 isn’t. So there will be sonical differences, in my experience, you can’t make nova grab as much as a “normal” serial EQ, it always sounds somewhat mellower. So if you want a drastic cut somewhere to remove a resonance or ringing or want a mighty boost for the snare in the hi end, TB EQ4 might be more suitable for that task. nova might be great for hi shelving a vocal for giving it some “air” without being harsh.
So imho they are for different use cases, although there might be overlaps.
Personally I use EQ4 way more often than Nova, but that is just personal preference, I see EQ4 more as a standard channel EQ and Nova for special purposes. Ymmv.