KVR Audio

zvenx · Post by **zvenx** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 4:54 pm

schnapsglas wrote:Ha, zero delay filters yet again.

I of course can be wrong, but I actually think it was one of NI mad scientist whose work in zero delay filters started the full current craze.

rsp

chk071 · Post by **chk071** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 4:55 pm

schnapsglas wrote:
$99 or $129 sounds NI-like to me.

Big price.

Especially considering Arturia sells the Mini V for the same price and has all the stuff in the upper panel in addition to the actual synth. Well, we'll see.

APHELEON s.a. · Post by **APHELEON s.a.** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 5:01 pm

To those of you yawning at Monark,

Listen to the filter again on the "revolution is coming" video ...that filter fking rips and sounds like it is alive with real electricity.
The filter and res sounds better than any other softsynth I've heard...even diva. The saturaton sounds like real voltage. You can also hear how punchy the env's are.

*Now* add to that the fact that we can jack that filter, envs, oscs etc. and put them into other reaktor synths (polys) as well as using reaktor as a vst fx and running your other softsynths, guitars w/e through the filter!(custom filterbank anyone?)

So I wonder, is it "just another moog" or your lack of imagination?

Phase47 · Post by **Phase47** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 5:06 pm

APHELEON s.a. wrote:The filter and res sounds better than any other softsynth I've heard...even diva. The saturaton sounds like real voltage. You can also hear how punchy the env's are.

The gauntlet has been thrown down...

hakey · Post by **hakey** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 5:20 pm

APHELEON s.a. wrote:The filter and res sounds better than any other softsynth I've heard...even diva. The saturaton sounds like real voltage. You can also hear how punchy the env's are.

All that from a youtube vid?

fluxmind · Post by **fluxmind** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 5:22 pm

zvenx wrote:
schnapsglas wrote:Ha, zero delay filters yet again.
I of course can be wrong, but I actually think it was one of NI mad scientist whose work in zero delay filters started the full current craze.

rsp

Sure let's stick to sh***y implementations, like resonance tracking a filter cut off point, it sounds so fantastic, like plastic

Why one would need a Zero-Delay Feedback, when one can have a plastic bag instead

Plastic Men!!!
at 5:25

V0RT3X · Post by **V0RT3X** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 5:22 pm

hakey wrote:
APHELEON s.a. wrote:The filter and res sounds better than any other softsynth I've heard...even diva. The saturaton sounds like real voltage. You can also hear how punchy the env's are.
All that from a youtube vid?

He must have golden ears

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_ear

Kriminal · Post by **Kriminal** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 5:22 pm

hakey wrote:
APHELEON s.a. wrote:The filter and res sounds better than any other softsynth I've heard...even diva. The saturaton sounds like real voltage. You can also hear how punchy the env's are.
All that from a youtube vid?

That is EXACTLY what i was going to say

stanlea · Post by **stanlea** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 5:24 pm

And you can even smell the perfume of hot circuits and plastics.

APHELEON s.a. · Post by **APHELEON s.a.** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 5:27 pm

No, you silly gentlemen...not just from a youtube video...

Did everybody already forget about Driver?

chk071 · Post by **chk071** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 5:30 pm

What's so bad about YT's audio? Seems clear enough to me to hear what it sounds like.

Unless you mean you can't judge without actually operating the synth yourself.

V0RT3X · Post by **V0RT3X** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 5:33 pm

chk071 wrote:What's so bad about YT's audio? Seems clear enough to me to hear what it sounds like.

It's good quality but it's also compressed to stream over the internet at a reduced file size.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YouTube#Quality_and_codecs

Anyways back on topic..

I am looking forward to the new releases! I can't believe how many amazing samplers and programs we have in this day and age.. it's seriously a blessing for those who want to make music.

chk071 · Post by **chk071** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 5:35 pm

Yeah, but so is Soundcloud. Never saw anyone complaining about not being able to judge sound banks quality due to that.

cron · Post by **cron** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 5:36 pm

V0RT3X wrote:
chk071 wrote:What's so bad about YT's audio? Seems clear enough to me to hear what it sounds like.
It's good quality but it's also compressed to stream over the internet at a reduced file size.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YouTube#Quality_and_codecs

192kbps AAC is transparent to the original for most. Golden ears?

V0RT3X · Post by **V0RT3X** » Mon Mar 11, 2013 5:38 pm

cron wrote:
V0RT3X wrote:
chk071 wrote:What's so bad about YT's audio? Seems clear enough to me to hear what it sounds like.
It's good quality but it's also compressed to stream over the internet at a reduced file size.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YouTube#Quality_and_codecs
192kbps AAC is transparent to the original for most. Golden ears?

lol I was just joking around about the golden ears thing. As for the compression link, I only pointed that out because of the previous comments to mine.

something new from NI