Sorry I expressed it a little confusingly, I mean the MSEGs afaik are timing-based like 1/16 beat, what i would appreciate another time-based in seconds enelope.pdxindy wrote:You also have the 4 MSEG'sBang Ali wrote:Just one request:
Is it possible to add more than 4 envelopes?
E.g. if i try to create a FMO-based patch using already 4 envelopes for volume or fm-amount ont the FMOs it would be great to have one or to (non time-based) envelopes free for other modulation.
I know this would be pure luxury
Zebra3 Info
-
- KVRer
- 23 posts since 8 Nov, 2011
-
- KVRAF
- 24407 posts since 7 Jan, 2009 from Croatia
MSEGs don't have to be tempo synced...
-
- KVRAF
- 26935 posts since 3 Feb, 2005 from in the wilds
Set the MSEG to seconds...Bang Ali wrote:Sorry I expressed it a little confusingly, I mean the MSEGs afaik are timing-based like 1/16 beat, what i would appreciate another time-based in seconds enelope.pdxindy wrote:You also have the 4 MSEG'sBang Ali wrote:Just one request:
Is it possible to add more than 4 envelopes?
E.g. if i try to create a FMO-based patch using already 4 envelopes for volume or fm-amount ont the FMOs it would be great to have one or to (non time-based) envelopes free for other modulation.
I know this would be pure luxury
-
- KVRer
- 23 posts since 8 Nov, 2011
-
- KVRist
- 78 posts since 4 Jan, 2012 from USA
Hopefully it'll be updated for the most recent pony incarnation that's taken the internet by stormmikeyo wrote:I don't ask for a lot but i really hope that following Z3's release there'll be a 'My Little Zebracorn' skin hot on it's heels!
Facts are meaningless, you can use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true
-
- KVRAF
- 1617 posts since 11 Dec, 2008 from Minneapolis
Sounds very cool. The 'module descriptions and signal flow' in particular, sort of a loose set of types for modules and parameters? Seems intriguing. Would this language interface with sample->wavetable tools?Urs wrote:Yep, such a model would be preferrable from our side as well.
We actually intend to come up with some sort of unified preset description language. In this, a preset contains not only the parameter settings but also the module descriptions and signal flow. This could be used to transfer presets from one synth to another, within the boundaries of the individual feature set.
(Might just be a fad but was at a web dev's birthday party a week ago, everyone liked JSON for object serialization)
-
- KVRist
- 293 posts since 18 Jul, 2003
This sounds *very* interesting. Would the idea of transferring presets be limited to u-he products or do you intend to publish the format and hope other developers adopt it?Urs wrote:Yep, such a model would be preferrable from our side as well.
We actually intend to come up with some sort of unified preset description language. In this, a preset contains not only the parameter settings but also the module descriptions and signal flow. This could be used to transfer presets from one synth to another, within the boundaries of the individual feature set.
-
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 30180 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
I'm not going to open the box of pandora, but naturally we wouldn't stop anyone from transforming presets from highly popular synthesizers into this format. We might even consider doing this ourselves for abandoned synths.rockin1 wrote:This sounds *very* interesting. Would the idea of transferring presets be limited to u-he products or do you intend to publish the format and hope other developers adopt it?Urs wrote:Yep, such a model would be preferrable from our side as well.
We actually intend to come up with some sort of unified preset description language. In this, a preset contains not only the parameter settings but also the module descriptions and signal flow. This could be used to transfer presets from one synth to another, within the boundaries of the individual feature set.
-
- KVRist
- 82 posts since 14 Jun, 2011
colinssx wrote:Hopefully it'll be updated for the most recent pony incarnation that's taken the internet by stormmikeyo wrote:I don't ask for a lot but i really hope that following Z3's release there'll be a 'My Little Zebracorn' skin hot on it's heels!
Awesome!
-
- KVRAF
- 3303 posts since 27 Mar, 2010 from UK
-
analogisdigital analogisdigital https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=317121
- KVRer
- 4 posts since 25 Nov, 2013
Will Zebra3 have a better/new GUI?
-
- KVRAF
- 24407 posts since 7 Jan, 2009 from Croatia
My guess is GUI will be completely overhauled.
But Z2 has a very good GUI as it is already.
But Z2 has a very good GUI as it is already.
-
- KVRAF
- 3878 posts since 28 Jun, 2009 from Wherever I lay my hat
From hours and days and months and years of experience... Zebra's GUI is the only one at which I can stare for hours and not get tired. All other synths (except maybe Synplant) induce eye fatigue over time. Love it, and I hope it doesn't get modernized too much.EvilDragon wrote:My guess is GUI will be completely overhauled.
But Z2 has a very good GUI as it is already.
But, as usual, opinions will differ wildly on this, so you'll never please everyone.
-
- KVRAF
- 3154 posts since 10 Jan, 2005
I find the default Zebra2 GUI a bit fatiguing... Unempty Dark Horse is much better imho...ariston wrote:From hours and days and months and years of experience... Zebra's GUI is the only one at which I can stare for hours and not get tired. All other synths (except maybe Synplant) induce eye fatigue over time. Love it, and I hope it doesn't get modernized too much.EvilDragon wrote:My guess is GUI will be completely overhauled.
But Z2 has a very good GUI as it is already.
But, as usual, opinions will differ wildly on this, so you'll never please everyone.
- Mario