Locus M wrote: If you can walk, talk and write but does not have a clue what music is you will never find out.
Sorry man, sometimes I simple can't resisttrimph1 wrote:Oh no....please... not this again.![]()
![]()
Locus M wrote: If you can walk, talk and write but does not have a clue what music is you will never find out.
Sorry man, sometimes I simple can't resisttrimph1 wrote:Oh no....please... not this again.![]()
![]()
Great idea! You can become a TV evangelist too. You even have the right name for itdavid.beholder wrote: televangelism
The fact that you're clown and you have a dream to become clown doesn't make it universal.Locus M wrote:You could also fulfill the universal childhood dream and become...(drumroll).... a CIRCUS CLOWN!![]()
lol Well it's fun to see that usually KVR people are expecting/desire the exact opposite than GS people.Gamma-UT wrote:I you hang out on the Electronic Music subforum at GearSlutz it seems to be more like Civil War re-enactment. You can't make techno UNLESS IT"S EXACTLY THE RIGHT GEAR!!! NOTHING ELSE WILL DO!!!Lotuzia wrote:Then sometimes on this forum, I get the feeling that a guy making music with an hw analog synth older than 5 years is someone just inbetween the dinosaur and the alien. With added snobbery of course. This is wrong. In my book, it's simply ..... a musician.
Oh that was just SO funny and really really clever!david.beholder wrote:
The fact that you're clown and you have a dream to become clown doesn't make it universal.
Come to think about it, maybe he meant you're this kind of clown:Locus M wrote:BTW: Isn't it a contradiction both to be a clown and have a dream to become one?


Oh. Of course. Would love to be the last one. There is something...familiar...about him.Tonberry wrote:Come to think about it, maybe he meant you're this kind of clown:Locus M wrote:BTW: Isn't it a contradiction both to be a clown and have a dream to become one?
and your dream is to become this kind a clown
I wouldn't mess with the second one, although it's hard not to appreciate first one's guitar skills.
I'm always amazed at how obvious sarcasm isn't obvious to everyone.Locus M wrote:If you can walk, talk and write but does not have a clue what music is you will never find out. Can I kindly recommend another career? How about being a gardener, a chimney sweep or a part time Santa Claus?david.beholder wrote:ARE YOU READY TO DEFINE WHAT IS MUSIC?
Quite so...zerocrossing wrote:I'm always amazed at how obvious sarcasm isn't obvious to everyone.Locus M wrote:If you can walk, talk and write but does not have a clue what music is you will never find out. Can I kindly recommend another career? How about being a gardener, a chimney sweep or a part time Santa Claus?david.beholder wrote:ARE YOU READY TO DEFINE WHAT IS MUSIC?
You're so perceptive.zerocrossing wrote:I'm always amazed at how obvious sarcasm isn't obvious to everyone.
I don''t have anything handy but I believe it's gone over in this video:Z1202 wrote:Any reference recording of what you're talking about, like the mentioned DSI feedback?zerocrossing wrote:Anyway, that's why I feel I don't have the bias that a lot of people talk about. I own software because I like what it is, and I own hardware because of what it is and I think there is a difference. You'll hit me, but I think the biggest differences (still even after this test) are in analog synths, and in those the biggest differences seem to be where things get a bit overdriven, like in filter overdrive, or even analog distortion. If someone can show me a synth that sounds like a DSI using it's feedback, I'd love to hear about it. Monark sounds great, but it's very simple. I like the way things sound when they're breaking.
It seems the video has just a little, but I think Monark's feedback is capable of pretty similar stuff (btw you have two different type choices there), especially if combined with filter resonance.zerocrossing wrote:I don''t have anything handy but I believe it's gone over in this video:Z1202 wrote:Any reference recording of what you're talking about, like the mentioned DSI feedback?zerocrossing wrote:Anyway, that's why I feel I don't have the bias that a lot of people talk about. I own software because I like what it is, and I own hardware because of what it is and I think there is a difference. You'll hit me, but I think the biggest differences (still even after this test) are in analog synths, and in those the biggest differences seem to be where things get a bit overdriven, like in filter overdrive, or even analog distortion. If someone can show me a synth that sounds like a DSI using it's feedback, I'd love to hear about it. Monark sounds great, but it's very simple. I like the way things sound when they're breaking.
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026