u-he

Cyoon · Post by **Cyoon** » Tue Aug 30, 2016 9:48 pm

yea, implement the future!!

please with time modulation

bmrzycki · Post by **bmrzycki** » Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:28 pm

Don't hold your breath for poly.

viewtopic.php?p=6439050#p6439050

viewtopic.php?p=6439859#p6439859

Urs · Post by **Urs** » Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:34 pm

david.beholder wrote:May be it's OK to just implement future and not care about CPU cycles? Gosh, processors are really cheap now, way cheaper than modulars or hw polysynths.

If implementing future means that the whole project postpones itself into the future, we won't finish it before we run out of cash. I'd rather have this out before. Besides, we'll see how people think once they actually get hands on it

chk071 · Post by **chk071** » Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:43 pm

Urs, any idea yet what the price of RePro will remotely be like?

david.beholder · Post by **david.beholder** » Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:48 pm

Urs wrote: If implementing future means that the whole project postpones itself into the future, we won't finish it before we run out of cash.

Implement future with ZDF please.
I'm not talking about poly vs mono. Only about endless CPU consumption conversation.

pdxindy · Post by **pdxindy** » Tue Aug 30, 2016 11:31 pm

Urs wrote:
david.beholder wrote:May be it's OK to just implement future and not care about CPU cycles? Gosh, processors are really cheap now, way cheaper than modulars or hw polysynths.
If implementing future means that the whole project postpones itself into the future, we won't finish it before we run out of cash. I'd rather have this out before. Besides, we'll see how people think once they actually get hands on it

I'll be happy with it as a mono synth... Diva is already an awesome poly synth

klinik · Post by **klinik** » Wed Aug 31, 2016 2:20 am

Cat out of the bag: We're contemplating (read: not promising anything) the design of a polyphonic MIDI module that can host a small number of RePros. Maybe just enough to play a chord. However this idea stands or falls with the ability to provide CV input connectivity - which is a major hassle in plug-in-land. In actual fact, it might never happen, or if it happens, maybe not in the best way we would have loved to.
So finally you don´t implement this Polyphonic Midi "host"???

aaron aardvark · Post by **aaron aardvark** » Wed Aug 31, 2016 5:14 am

Assuming RePro will play in sync with sequencer/DAW tempo, I am looking forward to trying it out (again).

Urs · Post by **Urs** » Wed Aug 31, 2016 7:51 am

klinik wrote:Cat out of the bag: We're contemplating (read: not promising anything) the design of a polyphonic MIDI module that can host a small number of RePros. Maybe just enough to play a chord. However this idea stands or falls with the ability to provide CV input connectivity - which is a major hassle in plug-in-land. In actual fact, it might never happen, or if it happens, maybe not in the best way we would have loved to.
So finally you don´t implement this Polyphonic Midi "host"???

Who says we don't? - Maybe we wish to develop more Repros first, provided it's a viable idea to do a Repro-DG or a Repro-DC... or that feline fella... something tells me, we shouldn't do a Four-Voice type thing without any Obie type Repro.

However, seeing that this little synth took one year to develop... not sure. OTOH much of this development time went into new technologies that could be leveraged for other mono synth developments...

In other words: I'd love to, but can't promise just yet!

Urs · Post by **Urs** » Wed Aug 31, 2016 7:57 am

david.beholder wrote:
Urs wrote: If implementing future means that the whole project postpones itself into the future, we won't finish it before we run out of cash.
Implement future with ZDF please.
I'm not talking about poly vs mono. Only about endless CPU consumption conversation.

No worries. There won't be compromises for the sake of CPU. But we also don't want waste CPU mindlessly

AnX · Post by **AnX** » Wed Aug 31, 2016 8:01 am

Urs wrote:
However, seeing that this little synth took one year to develop...

If thats from idea to release including research and testing, thats very quick.

Urs · Post by **Urs** » Wed Aug 31, 2016 8:09 am

AnX wrote:
Urs wrote:
However, seeing that this little synth took one year to develop...
If thats from idea to release including research and testing, thats very quick.

Well, not really if you consider the manpower, tools and experience we have. But on the other hand, we've also updated Presswerk with that project conversion tool during that time, and we've done a few other things on the side. I was just still not expecting things to be that difficult, especially not after having an "almost ready looking" alpha version half a year ago.

I do think it was worth it though.

Maykie · Post by **Maykie** » Wed Aug 31, 2016 8:31 am

Hi Urs

I had birthday in April. Can you make it special and show me (us) other tabs of the GUI ?

thanks

AnX · Post by **AnX** » Wed Aug 31, 2016 9:48 am

Urs wrote:
AnX wrote:
Urs wrote:
However, seeing that this little synth took one year to develop...
If thats from idea to release including research and testing, thats very quick.
Well, not really if you consider the manpower, tools and experience we have. But on the other hand, we've also updated Presswerk with that project conversion tool during that time, and we've done a few other things on the side. I was just still not expecting things to be that difficult, especially not after having an "almost ready looking" alpha version half a year ago.

I do think it was worth it though.

I have no doubts it will be

Urs · Post by **Urs** » Wed Aug 31, 2016 9:51 am

Maykie wrote:Hi Urs

I had birthday in April. Can you make it special and show me (us) other tabs of the GUI ?

thanks

No, but they're gonna look awesome

u-he

KVR Audio

[ANN] Repro-1