u-he

david.beholder · Post by **david.beholder** » Fri Jul 14, 2017 12:36 am

starla* wrote:
david.beholder wrote:WE NEED MORE MESSAGES LIKE:

I've heard that some guy said that other guy told him that rev X is superior to rev Y. Please implement rev X or else.

PLEASE ADD MORE MESSAGES LIKE THIS.
Not the u-he army again

I've done plenty of research between these two since I was going to buy one years ago.

Have you played both for long enough time or it's still what've that other guy said?

Cinebient · Post by **Cinebient** » Fri Jul 14, 2017 4:18 pm

I want REV 4.

knowix · Post by **knowix** » Fri Jul 14, 2017 5:25 pm

I want a perfect emulation of Martin Rev.

But seriously, questions about the rev versions were inevitable. Just check out any gearslutz thread comparing the revisions. Or the difference between PPG Wave versions. Or whether an MKS-80 is more like a Jupiter 8 or 6. So much agonising.

klinik · Post by **klinik** » Fri Jul 14, 2017 7:50 pm

Cinebient wrote:I want REV 4.

4?? you are nuts!! REV5 is better sounding...You are speaking of the ReproMKS-80 right???

krismiller1982 · Post by **krismiller1982** » Fri Jul 14, 2017 7:57 pm

So ummm. How long do you guys guess it will be before we can get our hands on the beta?

AnX · Post by **AnX** » Fri Jul 14, 2017 7:57 pm

3 months

Funkybot's Evil Twin · Fri Jul 14, 2017 7:58 pm

krismiller1982 wrote:So ummm. How long do you guys guess it will be before we can get our hands on the beta?

Like I said earlier in the thread: "two weeks."

mooneh · Post by **mooneh** » Fri Jul 14, 2017 9:27 pm

never mind (edited)

david.beholder · Post by **david.beholder** » Fri Jul 14, 2017 9:37 pm

Cinebient wrote:I want REV 4.

Why? You know that REV 6.9 is better.

starla* · Post by starla* » Sat Jul 15, 2017 5:08 am

david.beholder wrote:
Have you played both for long enough time or it's still what've that other guy said?

No Ive heard samples of both with middle C held down for exactly 5 sec then released, and filter fully open. My iPhone speakers distorted way more with rev 2. Definitely more vintage sounding. Night and day difference.

pitchdrifter · Post by **pitchdrifter** » Sat Jul 15, 2017 5:32 am

pdxindy · Post by **pdxindy** » Sat Jul 15, 2017 7:29 am

starla* wrote:
david.beholder wrote:
Have you played both for long enough time or it's still what've that other guy said?
No Ive heard samples of both with middle C held down for exactly 5 sec then released, and filter fully open. My iPhone speakers distorted way more with rev 2. Definitely more vintage sounding. Night and day difference.

Good that is finally settled...

krismiller1982 · Post by **krismiller1982** » Sat Jul 15, 2017 1:21 pm

Are we there yet???? Daaaaaad!!!!!? Are we there yet!!!!!? Kicks back of drivers seat - ARE - We - There - YET!!!!?

spunkmuffin · Post by **spunkmuffin** » Sat Jul 15, 2017 5:12 pm

While we wait read this strange but interesting discussion about microtuning and stuff.

Aphex Twin Speaks to Tatsuya Takahashi

In the Superbooth video Repro-5 has microtuning.

Maybe Repro-1 will get microtuning.

I used to think microtuning was WTF but now I think I get it.

Kids on the back seat can play with this.

Cinebient · Post by **Cinebient** » Sat Jul 15, 2017 5:49 pm

Microtuning is a must for me now and i wish all synths would have that.