Repro-5 public beta (Repro V1.1)

[Chris-S]

Yes, and the two little triangles to set the minimum and maximum LFO amount.

[Subarumannen]

If someone dosen't get Repro-1/5 running in KXStudio 14.04 (and possible Ubuntu 14.04) there seem to be some system libs incompatibility issues between those two since there are multiple users having the exact same experience.

I can run all other U-He stuff including previous versions of Repro-1 but the beta is a different creature.. Ardour and Carla as well as Reaper (linux) dosen't succeed scanning the pugin and accept it.. Bitwig is able to make it work but I don't have Bitwig and I am to old for Bitwig style music anyway

more info in the linux public beta thread viewtopic.php?f=31&t=424953&start=1065#p6932909

also i am wondering if one users similar experience with Windows 7 is related..
He can run all other U-he stuff except the latest Repros..
viewtopic.php?f=31&t=494717&start=600#p6932145

I hope we can find the reason for this issue

/Anders

[bob swans]

This VST sounds so good, I have been programming patches since i purchased it on Friday.
It sits really well in the mix with my Prophet 12 and some of the sounds i am getting out of it are almost on par with some
of the 6 voice patches i have programmed on the P12 (minus the multiple modulation possibilities obvs)
I am finding the lack of modulation options compared to the P12 is actually helping me dial sounds in quicker.

Thank you @Urs

[tasmaniandevil]

Preset author defaults to the last name you used when saving a patch, but you need to start from an init preset. If you start from a preset by another author, it defaults to that author's name.

(if it doesn't work that way... must be a bug... @Tas: check that out?)

Yup, checked. It's broken when using the new init function.

[tasmaniandevil]

well i just tried it again in OSX 10.12.6 and Ableton 9.7.1 with Push1: insert plugin, unfold device parameters, put Repro5 into Configure mode, click the preset arrows and a series of parameters shows up as it were for automation mapping both in the device window and in the Push controller screen under the knobs; yesterday it seemed to me they showed up only in the Push screen but i just re-did it and varius parameters pop up in both places...so the arrows definitely respond and give off data even though they themselves are not mappable.

Thanks for the informations, I'll add them to the bug ticket. Weird though, since it didn't show anything unusual anywhere when we tested it. Anyway, we'll figure it out eventually.

you might also check the Unison button, it is not mappable at all; and only some of the Tweak switches are automatable even though all appear as midi-mappable: for instance neither of the saw inversion switches show up for automation. best wishes

Yes, some parameters are MIDI-learnable, but not available for host automation. That's because some of them can produce problems when automating them, so it's better to leave them out.

[tasmaniandevil]

Hi Urs, U-he team.
I have a weird problem with the beta, both Repro-1 and Repro-5 v6634

Repro-1 v5332 works fine, as do all my other U-he plugins.

A first thought, this sounds like you have Repro-1 5332 and the new beta 6634 both installed at the same time. Could this be? Did you maybe install the new beta to a different location than the 1.0 release version of Repro-1?
If so, this might explain the issues you are experiencing. The host and Repro are getting confused about which Repro-1.data folder they should access and then create those issues as a result.
It might be best to write us a mail to support @ u-he, so we can get this sorted.

[Ingonator]

I found that if i want to route aftertouch to the Modwheel amount (e.g. for adding vibrato with aftertouch) in the mod matrix i have to select aftertouch as a source and for the target drag the pointer to the red arrow left to the Modwheel which represent the minimal Modwheel amount. In the mod matrix this target is called "GMod: Lower Limit".

[Sound Author]

This is probably obvious to people who are familiar with the Prophet 5, but I've noticed that there's an ever so slight phase offset between Oscillators A & B, as if they are not perfectly in tune. I imagine this is similar to the imperfect behavior of true analog oscillators. But is there a way to get them perfectly in tune? I don't really wanna do that. I'm just asking to see if it's possible.

[AnX]

The phase has nothing to do with tuning

[Sound Author]

True. I guess at first I thought it was a phase thing.

[hakey]

It's both tuning and phase. It isn't possible get the oscillators absolutely in tune (just like the real thing), which means that they are also out of phase. When they're close, there's an audible phasing effect.

[Sound Author]

Thanks hakey

[Ingonator]

It's both tuning and phase. It isn't possible get the oscillators absolutely in tune (just like the real thing), which means that they are also out of phase. When they're close, there's an audible phasing effect.

At the tweaks page theere is an oscillator model called "Ideal" which might help there.

To have both oscilators perfectly in tune you could also use Osc Sync.

Anyway personally having perfectly tuned oscilators is not what i want to use a proper Prophet 5 emulation like this for.

[Urs]

I think the slow beating has a large say in the magic of this thing.

[dhlkid]

Hi

I installed both Repro 1 demo & Repro 5 beta in my OS10.8.x Mac, but both crashed/ quit suddenly in my Vienna Ensemble Pro 5,
Although both didn't crash in my Cubase, GUI didn't my show up,
Don't know why!

Thx