This is what I am having to do also but it's just so infuriating other sources are not there and yet they have the audacity to say it's all I'll ever need. Every other synth I've ever used (AFAIK) allows envelopes and LFO's as mod sources.mholloway wrote:Mushy Mushy wrote:From the manual:
"Note: It should be remembered that in the case of selecting Velocity or Pitch as a Source in the Modulation Matrix, there will be no access to all parameters in the Destination column, because both, Velocity and Pitch, are source controllers working per voice, and some of the parameters affect all Layer voices (e.g.Insert effects parameters). To those kind of parameters Velocity and Pitch sources cannot be assigned."
Ah crap, ok you got me there. I frequently assign Modwheel ('modulation') to FX parameters and incorrectly assumed the same would work for Velocity. Too bad.
I was totally wrong on that, thanks for the correction.
Lush-101
-
- KVRAF
- 15135 posts since 7 Sep, 2008
"I was wondering if you'd like to try Magic Mushrooms"
"Oooh I dont know. Sounds a bit scary"
"It's not scary. You just lose a sense of who you are and all that sh!t"
"Oooh I dont know. Sounds a bit scary"
"It's not scary. You just lose a sense of who you are and all that sh!t"
-
- KVRAF
- 15135 posts since 7 Sep, 2008
Oh and BTW if you're asking yourself why I'm persisting it's because it sounds fantastic, albeit incredibly inflexible. It's like having all the ingredients for a cake but no baking dish. So so close yet so far.
"I was wondering if you'd like to try Magic Mushrooms"
"Oooh I dont know. Sounds a bit scary"
"It's not scary. You just lose a sense of who you are and all that sh!t"
"Oooh I dont know. Sounds a bit scary"
"It's not scary. You just lose a sense of who you are and all that sh!t"
-
- KVRian
- 513 posts since 26 Nov, 2009
Many daws have built-in modulators like envelopes, lfo etc that will do the job you need, as long as the synth parameters can be automated.Mushy Mushy wrote: This is what I am having to do also but it's just so infuriating other sources are not there and yet they have the audacity to say it's all I'll ever need. Every other synth I've ever used (AFAIK) allows envelopes and LFO's as mod sources.
-
- KVRAF
- 15135 posts since 7 Sep, 2008
Yes, good thinking. I'll certainly investigate thisanomandaris1 wrote:Many daws have built-in modulators like envelopes, lfo etc that will do the job you need, as long as the synth parameters can be automated.
"I was wondering if you'd like to try Magic Mushrooms"
"Oooh I dont know. Sounds a bit scary"
"It's not scary. You just lose a sense of who you are and all that sh!t"
"Oooh I dont know. Sounds a bit scary"
"It's not scary. You just lose a sense of who you are and all that sh!t"
-
- KVRAF
- 2301 posts since 11 Jan, 2009 from Portland, OR, USA
Obviously you don't spend much time with analog hardware, then.Mushy Mushy wrote:Oh and BTW if you're asking yourself why I'm persisting it's because it sounds fantastic, albeit incredibly inflexible. It's like having all the ingredients for a cake but no baking dish. So so close yet so far.
Because if LuSH is "incredibly inflexible," even with all the programming on offer, I can't imagine how you'd feel about a Minimoog or Juno (or SH-101 !!). I guess your interest in synthesizers is relegated solely to modern apps that provide a wealth of options? If so, ok, sure; but maybe don't buy emulations of analog synths, in that case? Maybe focus elsewhere, as recommended earlier, on options like Zebra?
Most of your frustration can be chocked up to the thing you bought simply not being the type of thing you seem to have wanted in the first place. That's not the products fault, that's the fault of you not buying what you actually wanted / needed.
But whatev. Good luck.
-
- KVRAF
- 15135 posts since 7 Sep, 2008
Guess again, I have a wall and a rack of vintage analogs and have been doing this for ~25 years.mholloway wrote:Obviously you don't spend much time with analog hardware, then.Mushy Mushy wrote:Oh and BTW if you're asking yourself why I'm persisting it's because it sounds fantastic, albeit incredibly inflexible. It's like having all the ingredients for a cake but no baking dish. So so close yet so far.
Because if LuSH is "incredibly inflexible," even with all the programming on offer, I can't imagine how you'd feel about a Minimoog or Juno (or SH-101 !!). I guess your interest in synthesizers is relegated solely to modern apps that provide a wealth of options? If so, ok, sure; but maybe don't buy emulations of analog synths, in that case? Maybe focus elsewhere, as recommended earlier, on options like Zebra?
Most of your frustration can be chocked up to the thing you bought simply not being the type of thing you seem to have wanted in the first place. That's not the products fault, that's the fault of you not buying what you actually wanted / needed.
But whatev. Good luck.
I say again, it sounds great but it could be a lot better.
"I was wondering if you'd like to try Magic Mushrooms"
"Oooh I dont know. Sounds a bit scary"
"It's not scary. You just lose a sense of who you are and all that sh!t"
"Oooh I dont know. Sounds a bit scary"
"It's not scary. You just lose a sense of who you are and all that sh!t"
- KVRAF
- 25417 posts since 3 Feb, 2005 from in the wilds
There's no need to be insulting... just because I don't find Lush 101 interesting does not make my imagination limited. If it works for you great...mholloway wrote:You guys seem to have rather limited imaginations when it comes to the possibilities of a synth.... "one layer isn't very interesting" Huh? Really?
One layer of LuSH-101 offers more programming functionality than 90% of vintage analog synths that everybody lusts after and begs for accurate emulations of... but somehow it's still not enough? If one layer of LuSH-101 is too limited for you synthesis wise, then you must HATE a synth like RePro-5, which has even less options for programming (just one LFO!!, etc).
I get lots more interesting sounds from RePro... because it has gorgeous sounding audio rate modulations. I love audio rate modulations! I find Lush bland in that regard.
- KVRAF
- 25417 posts since 3 Feb, 2005 from in the wilds
Yes, most all parameters in Lush101 can be automated. It's a bit of a hassle in Lush cause there are no default automation mappings. You have to map everything in Lush preferences. Once mapped it automates fine.anomandaris1 wrote:Many daws have built-in modulators like envelopes, lfo etc that will do the job you need, as long as the synth parameters can be automated.Mushy Mushy wrote: This is what I am having to do also but it's just so infuriating other sources are not there and yet they have the audacity to say it's all I'll ever need. Every other synth I've ever used (AFAIK) allows envelopes and LFO's as mod sources.
- KVRAF
- 25417 posts since 3 Feb, 2005 from in the wilds
That is unfortunate choice... as it does not account for mono sounds...Mushy Mushy wrote:From the manual:
"Note: It should be remembered that in the case of selecting Velocity or Pitch as a Source in the Modulation Matrix, there will be no access to all parameters in the Destination column, because both, Velocity and Pitch, are source controllers working per voice, and some of the parameters affect all Layer voices (e.g.Insert effects parameters). To those kind of parameters Velocity and Pitch sources cannot be assigned."
-
- KVRian
- 1204 posts since 23 May, 2016
Also the marketing for lush was more towards a modern synth, not a vintage one. I found mapping a bit work intensive, probably can't be done much better because of the multiple layers. But would have been great if there was a default parameter mapping as initial setup after installing.
-
- KVRist
- 308 posts since 19 Feb, 2011
ok demoing this I think I fell in love do you think they will upgrade it to version 2 ever in future or future updates, or what you buy is what you get?
Last edited by ScottZ on Tue Oct 16, 2018 7:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRian
- 1185 posts since 11 Sep, 2015
good question, no one knows, so far they have updated many effects to version 2 but none of their instruments.
it would be nice but I'm not holding my breath... I consider it to be as is at this point.
soon lush101 will be 6 years old already.
it would be nice but I'm not holding my breath... I consider it to be as is at this point.
soon lush101 will be 6 years old already.
-
- KVRAF
- 1822 posts since 25 Feb, 2005
On sale in JRR for 39 bucks.
Mac Studio
10.14.7.3
Cubase 13, Ableton Live 12
10.14.7.3
Cubase 13, Ableton Live 12
- KVRAF
- 6980 posts since 28 Dec, 2015 from Atlantis Island
Still wondering if I can squeeze some unconventional (not heard a hundred times) sounds out of this thing...
https://sonograyn.bandcamp.com/music Experimental Ambient
https://martinjuenke.bandcamp.com/music Alternative Instrumental
https://martinjuenke.bandcamp.com/music Alternative Instrumental