KVR Audio

AnalogObsession · Post by **AnalogObsession** » Wed Oct 17, 2018 4:21 pm

Sorry, replied via personal account, again.

I got it.

I will touch GUI before updating.

Will be available tomorrow night.

AnalogObsession · Post by **AnalogObsession** » Thu Oct 18, 2018 8:32 am

BUSTER updated with new GUI!

You can find on your dashboard.

garfield78 · Post by **garfield78** » Thu Oct 18, 2018 1:24 pm

AnalogObsession wrote: ↑Thu Oct 18, 2018 8:32 am BUSTER updated with new GUI!

You can find on your dashboard.

Nice gui !

The samplerate issue is fixed?

AnalogObsession · Post by **AnalogObsession** » Thu Oct 18, 2018 4:04 pm

garfield78 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 18, 2018 1:24 pm
AnalogObsession wrote: ↑Thu Oct 18, 2018 8:32 am BUSTER updated with new GUI!

You can find on your dashboard.
Nice gui !

The samplerate issue is fixed?

Thanks!

It's fixed, i believe. No issue for now.

But there is only thing, threshold range will change with samplerate. But that's not error. My framework causes this.(Analog modelıng framework)

AnalogObsession · Post by **AnalogObsession** » Thu Oct 18, 2018 4:07 pm

Sale is extended!

Just $29! (REG.$39)

Burillo · Post by **Burillo** » Thu Oct 18, 2018 4:21 pm

AnalogObsession wrote: ↑Thu Oct 18, 2018 4:04 pm But there is only thing, threshold range will change with samplerate. But that's not error. My framework causes this.(Analog modelıng framework)

see, that's the kind of thing that makes people wary of your attitude towards development.

it doesn't matter if it's your error, or if it's something that is caused by a framework you use. compressor's threshold working differently when using different sample rates is a bug, irrespective of what caused it. you have to find a way to fix it - either by sidestepping the limitation (in perhaps a very technically ugly way, but hey, if it works...), or by ditching the framework and coding your own analog modeling. what you can't do is leaving it as is and say "it's framework, can't do anything, therefore won't fix".

AnalogObsession · Post by **AnalogObsession** » Thu Oct 18, 2018 4:25 pm

Burillo wrote: ↑Thu Oct 18, 2018 4:21 pm
AnalogObsession wrote: ↑Thu Oct 18, 2018 4:04 pm But there is only thing, threshold range will change with samplerate. But that's not error. My framework causes this.(Analog modelıng framework)
see, that's the kind of thing that makes people wary of your attitude towards development.

it doesn't matter if it's your error, or if it's something that is caused by a framework you use. compressor's threshold working differently when using different sample rates is a bug, irrespective of what caused it. you have to find a way to fix it - either by sidestepping the limitation (in perhaps a very technically ugly way, but hey, if it works...), or by ditching the framework and coding your own analog modeling. what you can't do is leaving it as is and say "it's framework, can't do anything, therefore won't fix".

Sorry, i didn't mean that i won't fix it.

I'm still working on it. But the only samplerate issue changing threshold range. I meant that. Not offense.

Thanks.

Burillo · Post by **Burillo** » Thu Oct 18, 2018 4:32 pm

if it is going to be fixed, then great. looking forward to it.

FWIW i'm waiting for weekend to test Buster against the Townhouse (which i haven't yet tried), but so far, irrespective of whether it's actually properly emulating an SSL or not, i'm leaning towards buying it because it provides almost a one-knob access to a kind of sound i like and usually have to work for to get. that's gotta be worth at least $29

AnalogObsession · Post by **AnalogObsession** » Thu Oct 18, 2018 4:46 pm

Burillo wrote: ↑Thu Oct 18, 2018 4:32 pm if it is going to be fixed, then great. looking forward to it.

FWIW i'm waiting for weekend to test Buster against the Townhouse (which i haven't yet tried), but so far, irrespective of whether it's actually properly emulating an SSL or not, i'm leaning towards buying it because it provides almost a one-knob access to a kind of sound i like and usually have to work for to get. that's gotta be worth at least $29

Hey!

I totally fixed it, now!

No problem about framework! Just wrong typing. What a shame!

Fixed will be available in a hour!

garfield78 · Post by **garfield78** » Thu Oct 18, 2018 4:46 pm

great news !

AnalogObsession · Post by **AnalogObsession** » Thu Oct 18, 2018 5:15 pm

IMPORTANT UPDATE!

Fixed Samplerate/Threshold Range issue!

Thanks.

The Noodlist · Post by **The Noodlist** » Sun Feb 03, 2019 12:22 am

Buster is $9 until Monday.
http://analogobsession.com/product/buster

cprompt · Post by **cprompt** » Sun Feb 03, 2019 1:18 am

But even at $9 is it worth it? What I mean is, it's had such a chequered history with bugs and stuff, is this finally a solid compressor that works properly and reliably?

The Noodlist · Post by **The Noodlist** » Sun Feb 03, 2019 8:33 am

cprompt wrote: ↑Sun Feb 03, 2019 1:18 am But even at $9 is it worth it? What I mean is, it's had such a chequered history with bugs and stuff, is this finally a solid compressor that works properly and reliably?

That's the $9 question, there's a demo available to try.

garfield78 · Post by **garfield78** » Sun Feb 03, 2019 10:20 am

For me buster v4 is stable and sound good on vst .

Analog Obsession releases BUSTER v4 & intro price!