There is no clashing detection !
Is there anything like Izotope's Neutron that clearly shows frequency clashes ?
- KVRAF
- 2119 posts since 10 Apr, 2002 from Saint Germain en Laye, France
- KVRist
- 235 posts since 11 Oct, 2012
Right, I completely forgot about those additional settings, was focused on the frequency selction! And I think I don't really use thoise settings that often.AdvancedFollower wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2019 5:07 pmThere's also an advanced section with L/R or M/S modes, Attack, Release etc. However the actual frequency selection is still automatic and doesn't give you much flexibility, except for the Low/High pass filters and amount. Still a great plugin though, it does one thing and it does it well.metaside wrote: ↑Sat Jun 22, 2019 8:01 pmI use both, Trackspacer is a good 1-trick-thingy for multiband-sidechaining without the need to select specific EQ points. Of course, it doesn't do anything else and you only have LP/HP filters and a wet/dry control (at least in the version I got a while ago), so you have much less flexibility as compared to Pro-Q 3. Very different plugins imho. For more or less blind quick multiband sidechaining, I would go for Trackspacer. If I want to do something more specific with control over specific frequencies, I would use Pro-Q 3.MasterTuner wrote: ↑Sat Jun 22, 2019 7:01 pm Has anyone got Trackspacer by Waves factory, - and if so, how does that compare to Pro-Q3's dynamic eq-ing ?
I still have Neutron 1 but not using it much anymore - I similarly often just use an EQ with spectrum analyzer. But I imagine Melda plugins to be great for analysis since they are highly flexible.My current method to visualize clashes is to just load spectrum analyzers on each track and pull them up side by side. Thinking about picking up Neutron 3 (it's just $99 for me since I got NE for free), but it feels a bit overkill. I already have tons of compressors, EQ's, exciters etc, and Neutron feels too much like a replacement for all those. Might get MMultiAnalyzer next time it's 50% off.
Also, the one thing I would really miss about Neutron is the multiband transient shaper, i often use that one as a plugin.
Some music with visuals and mixed tutorials related to game dev and sound design: https://www.youtube.com/@MetasideOfficial
- KVRian
- 597 posts since 10 Jan, 2017
For me Trackspacer really excels at handling material with high variance - like using it on a synth lead and feeding it with a vocal. For more static material, like sidechaining a bassline with a kick drum, I still use a dynamic EQ and usually prefer the result.metaside wrote: ↑Sat Jun 22, 2019 8:01 pmI use both, Trackspacer is a good 1-trick-thingy for multiband-sidechaining without the need to select specific EQ points. Of course, it doesn't do anything else and you only have LP/HP filters and a wet/dry control (at least in the version I got a while ago), so you have much less flexibility as compared to Pro-Q 3. Very different plugins imho. For more or less blind quick multiband sidechaining, I would go for Trackspacer. If I want to do something more specific with control over specific frequencies, I would use Pro-Q 3.MasterTuner wrote: ↑Sat Jun 22, 2019 7:01 pm Has anyone got Trackspacer by Waves factory, - and if so, how does that compare to Pro-Q3's dynamic eq-ing ?
-
- KVRAF
- 2396 posts since 28 Sep, 2012
I’ve got both Trackspacer and Pro-Q 3.
In my case, Trackspacer is more resource demanding than ProQ. I still haven’t figured out how to have one instance of Pro-Q dynamically linked to another. I use the sidechain, just as I would in Trackspacer, which is a pain in Ableton 9 (does 10 improve this)?
But, since you want to do this on the cheap, Trackspacer is on sale for €39 for one week-ish.
In my case, Trackspacer is more resource demanding than ProQ. I still haven’t figured out how to have one instance of Pro-Q dynamically linked to another. I use the sidechain, just as I would in Trackspacer, which is a pain in Ableton 9 (does 10 improve this)?
But, since you want to do this on the cheap, Trackspacer is on sale for €39 for one week-ish.
- KVRist
- 235 posts since 11 Oct, 2012
Good point. For extremely static 4/4 material I sometimes even use something like Volumeshaper.andymcbain wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 12:50 pm
For me Trackspacer really excels at handling material with high variance - like using it on a synth lead and feeding it with a vocal. For more static material, like sidechaining a bassline with a kick drum, I still use a dynamic EQ and usually prefer the result.
Some music with visuals and mixed tutorials related to game dev and sound design: https://www.youtube.com/@MetasideOfficial
- KVRAF
- 2119 posts since 10 Apr, 2002 from Saint Germain en Laye, France
yes Ableton 10.1 improves sidechain with VSTperpetual3 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 12:54 pm I use the sidechain, just as I would in Trackspacer, which is a pain in Ableton 9 (does 10 improve this)?