Thanks for the insight. I guess then they will simply add 32 cores and then it will easily beat any Intel. I actually always liked RISC (maybe it's not worth to be called like this nowadays, I don't know), and appreciate that they try something new, only the way they are doing is very annoying to me.MeldaProduction wrote: ↑Sun Oct 20, 2019 6:12 pm Assembler isn't relevant anymore, though those of us, who love optimization use intrinsics (sort of compiler optimizable proxies to asm instructions). But that's fine, we can survive without these optimizations. The biggest concern there to me will be technological differences - I assume ARM is big endian (which never made sense to me) and Intel stuff is little endian. I think these things won't be a huge deal, but who knows. You know I like things simple, and another platform is the opposite of simple. Anyways the new CPU I can understand (despite I cannot imagine it would compete Intel stuff, at least not for performance stuff, yes for energy efficiency though).
My main concern with Apple's general strategy is the constant implementation of crappy technologies and then deprecating them. The cherry on top is forcing developers to use a different programming language, we all know what I'm talking about
Mac news pages tell you the rumor that there will be some kind of x86_64 emulation layer running on ARM then, similar to Rosetta. Is that even possible?