Future of Synthesizers
-
- addled muppet weed
- 105834 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
moog will become "droog".
korg will become "grok"
roland will become a kebab shop owner in london and people will ask "werent you in grange hill?".
korg will become "grok"
roland will become a kebab shop owner in london and people will ask "werent you in grange hill?".
- Banned
- 7624 posts since 13 Nov, 2015 from Norway
But what about Yamaha?
EnergyXT3 - LMMS - FL Studio | Roland SH201 - Waldorf Rocket | SoundCloud - Bandcamp
-
- addled muppet weed
- 105834 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
-
- addled muppet weed
- 105834 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
just had a quick shuffle of the old tarot cards...
looks like at some point, moog will release an all analogue hardware emulation of diva.
and you will meet a handsome stranger who will sweep you off your feet.
looks like at some point, moog will release an all analogue hardware emulation of diva.
and you will meet a handsome stranger who will sweep you off your feet.
- Banned
- 3564 posts since 22 Aug, 2019
That's also my view more or less.mschenkel wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2020 2:45 pm I don’t think there will be radical changes in the sound generating technologies; actual technology gives us already any kind of natural and not so natural way of generating sounds: FM/PM, physical modelling, multitimbrality in the "natural" domain; granular, wavetable, subtractive, additive in the "artificial" and some exotic stuff such as mechanical synthesis.
The real challenge imo will be much more performance oriented: how can I expressively control these sound generators in a meaningful way? Right now it seems 3 dimensional keyboards are the answer such as linnstrumet, roli and touché.
Already today when one listens to a modern production with synths, one can't tell which sounds were made using which type of synthesis. It simply sounds modern, that's all. So, any "new" synthesis type would only add to that, but make no difference.
Modeling might become much better, but what is the goal? To emulate long established instruments. So again, no difference regarding the outcome.
- Banned
- 3564 posts since 22 Aug, 2019
What have those contributed to synthesis?Tj Shredder wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2020 2:42 pmYou never heard about St.Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band and Björk? Or the GRM tools, spat and I don’t know what?
-
- addled muppet weed
- 105834 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
well they where more "examples of artists that had used things innovated in those institutes"e-crooner wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2020 5:08 pmWhat have those contributed to synthesis?Tj Shredder wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2020 2:42 pmYou never heard about St.Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band and Björk? Or the GRM tools, spat and I don’t know what?
- Banned
- 7624 posts since 13 Nov, 2015 from Norway
EnergyXT3 - LMMS - FL Studio | Roland SH201 - Waldorf Rocket | SoundCloud - Bandcamp
- KVRAF
- 14989 posts since 26 Jun, 2006 from San Francisco Bay Area
We’re already seeing a sort of post-modern approach where people are taking past classics and modern tech and throwing it all together. This will probably continue. We’ll see things like additive and physical modeling return to hardware synths. This also has already started. We’ll see it in hybrids like the Peak and Prophet 12/Pro 2/3, which have lots of ways to make use of gain overdrive and feedback. Interfaces like the Quantum’s will start showing up on less expensive instruments.
Meanwhile, the need to go with hardware for sounds will continue to shrink. I think Massive X was a bit step forward in introducing a synth that had built in distortion that was worthy. The Roland Cloud stuff is good in that way as well.
I also hope that the trend for new MPE instruments takes over and becomes the standard. Bigger companies need to take the plunge and make good affordable keyboards similar to the Osmose. Maybe even license their tech. Another way to involve the hands in expression will open things up a lot. Imagine a polyphonic hybrid from Sequential with a keyboard from Roli.
Meanwhile, the need to go with hardware for sounds will continue to shrink. I think Massive X was a bit step forward in introducing a synth that had built in distortion that was worthy. The Roland Cloud stuff is good in that way as well.
I also hope that the trend for new MPE instruments takes over and becomes the standard. Bigger companies need to take the plunge and make good affordable keyboards similar to the Osmose. Maybe even license their tech. Another way to involve the hands in expression will open things up a lot. Imagine a polyphonic hybrid from Sequential with a keyboard from Roli.
Zerocrossing Media
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
-
- addled muppet weed
- 105834 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
-
- addled muppet weed
- 105834 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
-
- KVRist
- 116 posts since 18 Feb, 2012 from United States
It'll all be subscription based. Even hardware synths you'll have to pay a license for in order for it to create sound every month. Each person will be able to have an elicencer that they must carry around that keeps all their synth licences on it and they need to plug in to each synth to get it to work.
"FriendZone"
-
- addled muppet weed
- 105834 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
which will also be needed to start the tron bike.paulm12 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 27, 2020 7:08 pm It'll all be subscription based. Even hardware synths you'll have to pay a license for in order for it to create sound every month. Each person will be able to have an elicencer that they must carry around that keeps all their synth licences on it and they need to plug in to each synth to get it to work.
of course.