Bitwig Studio 3.2 Beta 8

[Hez]

Why would this be a problem in real use terms? I’m not sure I understand , this is just when you duplicate a track so you have an identical track with the same EQ on so you get phase issues?

Wouldn't that impact EQ-ing mid & side separately, for example? Or any other parallel processing situation?

Yea, I think at the moment you'd have to put an empty EQ+ on e.g. the mid channel (or a 4 sample time shift) if you wanted to EQ the sides. Likewise for L/R EQing. It's a little bit inelegant.

[pdxindy]

Why would this be a problem in real use terms? I’m not sure I understand , this is just when you duplicate a track so you have an identical track with the same EQ on so you get phase issues?

Wouldn't that impact EQ-ing mid & side separately, for example? Or any other parallel processing situation?

Yea, I think at the moment you'd have to put an empty EQ+ on e.g. the mid channel (or a 4 sample time shift) if you wanted to EQ the sides. Likewise for L/R EQing. It's a little bit inelegant.

yup... it's a disappointing development re EQ+

[SLiC]

Bitwig 3.2 is out

[Quack Quack]

yup... it's a disappointing development re EQ+

Holy shit I think this is the first thing you have ever said negative towards Bitwig congrats!

Anyone know if Mid Side is possible with EQ+? It would be awesome to stop using 3rd party vsts for EQ.

[pdxindy]

yup... it's a disappointing development re EQ+

Holy shit I think this is the first thing you have ever said negative towards Bitwig congrats!

I've said dozens of such comments... especially in the early days when there were a significant number of bugs I was frequently critical. When the first 3.2 beta came out I was initially disappointed and said so. After a few more betas I changed my mind and now I'm satisfied with 3.2