Anyone else seeing that the LX hits your CPU hard? - If not, is there any way to lower it's usage, as I would like to have some of that Juno-60 flavour
Tal-UNO-LX eating up more CPU than Serum?
-
TheKinkyChinky TheKinkyChinky https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=470393
- KVRer
- Topic Starter
- 1 posts since 14 Jul, 2020
So I've just bought the LX, having heard online that it wasn't too CPU intensive like Serum and Diva. However, when I was trying it out, the CPU meter on Ableton was much higher than it was for when I used a similar sound/chord progression for Serum (supposedly a very CPU intensive synth).
Anyone else seeing that the LX hits your CPU hard? - If not, is there any way to lower it's usage, as I would like to have some of that Juno-60 flavour
Anyone else seeing that the LX hits your CPU hard? - If not, is there any way to lower it's usage, as I would like to have some of that Juno-60 flavour
-
- Banned
- 7624 posts since 13 Nov, 2015 from Norway
turn down the number of voices and shorter release helps.
EnergyXT3 - LMMS - FL Studio | Roland SH201 - Waldorf Rocket | SoundCloud - Bandcamp
-
- KVRian
- 1185 posts since 11 Sep, 2015
I certainly see LX-V2 as one of my synths on which I should be wary of my polycount and release if I go chordal on it.
It's a good emulation that will fetch as much cycles as it needs to do its thing.
It's a good emulation that will fetch as much cycles as it needs to do its thing.
