What are the differences between the Synclavier and the DX7?
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1142 posts since 31 Dec, 2020
Can they do the same things?
Bonus points for relating it to the VST versions since I have no interest (nor money) in ever owning the hardware.
Bonus points for relating it to the VST versions since I have no interest (nor money) in ever owning the hardware.
Muh bandcamp: https://automatedhero.bandcamp.com/?fro ... _dashboard
- KVRAF
- 1644 posts since 8 Feb, 2013 from Switzerland
Free DEXED is an almost perfect plugin version of the Yamaha DX7 Mark I. Grab it!
- KVRAF
- 18561 posts since 16 Sep, 2001 from Las Vegas,USA
The difference was about $180,000
You can read more here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synclavier
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yamaha_DX7
Arturia has a Synclavier emulation:
https://www.arturia.com/synclavier-v/overview
You can read more here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synclavier
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yamaha_DX7
Arturia has a Synclavier emulation:
https://www.arturia.com/synclavier-v/overview
Last edited by Teksonik on Thu Feb 18, 2021 6:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1142 posts since 31 Dec, 2020
Indeed. But the sound quality, to my ears, was awfulEtienne1973 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 18, 2021 6:27 pm Free DEXED is an almost perfect plugin version of the Yamaha DX7 Mark I. Grab it!
Muh bandcamp: https://automatedhero.bandcamp.com/?fro ... _dashboard
-
- KVRist
- 125 posts since 9 Oct, 2019
Synclavier - Additive synthesis, sample playback, resynthesis, basic FM. 8 layers.
DX7 - 6 operators FM (phase modullation, actually) allowing complex algorythms
Synclavier can do much more, but DX7 is better at FM.
I am talking about Arturia emulations.
DX7 - 6 operators FM (phase modullation, actually) allowing complex algorythms
Synclavier can do much more, but DX7 is better at FM.
I am talking about Arturia emulations.
- KVRAF
- 18561 posts since 16 Sep, 2001 from Las Vegas,USA
Then you'll say the same thing about the hardware. I've owned a DX7 and TX7 and Dexed gives me all I want......ghostwhistler wrote: ↑Thu Feb 18, 2021 6:32 pmIndeed. But the sound quality, to my ears, was awfulEtienne1973 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 18, 2021 6:27 pm Free DEXED is an almost perfect plugin version of the Yamaha DX7 Mark I. Grab it!
None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1142 posts since 31 Dec, 2020
Maybe so, but for me the sound was just so quiet even on full whack
Muh bandcamp: https://automatedhero.bandcamp.com/?fro ... _dashboard
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1142 posts since 31 Dec, 2020
I have that version, that's why I'm asking: not sure if it'd be redundant picking up the DX7 vst as well (dexxed notwithstanding)Teksonik wrote: ↑Thu Feb 18, 2021 6:32 pm The difference was about $180,000
You can read more here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synclavier
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yamaha_DX7
Arturia has a Synclavier emulation:
https://www.arturia.com/synclavier-v/overview
Muh bandcamp: https://automatedhero.bandcamp.com/?fro ... _dashboard
-
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 1142 posts since 31 Dec, 2020
Could you expand on that a little? Or a lot?
Muh bandcamp: https://automatedhero.bandcamp.com/?fro ... _dashboard
- KVRian
- 806 posts since 7 Aug, 2015 from H2O
What you can do within the partials is incredibly versatile and unique, specifically being able to add as many frames within a partial to change the harmonics, tuning, etc - in a manner DX7 simply cannot do. Of course, there's the resynthesis and sample components, as well (that I don't really even use). Like most of the crap we read here, this crap is purely my opinion. Maybe I just find Synclavier much more intuitive to explore and create, whereas DX7 pretty much stays within the box (with exceptions) of the standard FM machine that the original is - of which I prefer Octopus or FM8 (the latter of which using the noise yields neat musical responses). I would suggest watching Arturia's 2nd tutorial video, and then check out the update videos. Oh, one variable DX7 has that I wish Synclavier had are the MSEGs and LFO/sequencer. Maybe in an update. That would a wonderful update for Synclavier.
Edited to say: This actually encouraged me to spend more time with DX7, and I have to take back my vice-versa comment. There are definitely things DX7 can do that you can't with Synclavier.
-
- KVRAF
- 1574 posts since 28 Jul, 2006
Is dexed better than Arturia dx7?
-
gentleclockdivider gentleclockdivider https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=203660
- KVRAF
- 6112 posts since 22 Mar, 2009 from gent
Dexed is less of a cpu hog. , simple install, no bells and whistles and it’s free ..
Oh. And it sounds great ... win/ win situation
Oh. And it sounds great ... win/ win situation
Eyeball exchanging
Soul calibrating ..frequencies
Soul calibrating ..frequencies
-
- KVRAF
- 1574 posts since 28 Jul, 2006
I already own the Arturia and I'm pretty well covered with cpu throughput, I just want to know if Dexed is actually better in sound quality.gentleclockdivider wrote: ↑Sat Feb 20, 2021 1:03 am Dexed is less of a cpu hog. , simple install, no bells and whistles and it’s free ..
Oh. And it sounds great ... win/ win situation
- KVRAF
- 8828 posts since 6 Jan, 2017 from Outer Space
Digital synths are, you guessed it, digital. With the same patch they sound the same unless you want to degrade the sound quality with emulations of a bad DAC... The huge advantage of Dexed is, that it supports MPE and thus you can play it expressively in a way even a DX7 with breath controller could never do...
The huge disadvantage is its UI compared to Arturia. Arturia also added some other extras... But MPE is the reason I more likely load Dexed...
The huge disadvantage is its UI compared to Arturia. Arturia also added some other extras... But MPE is the reason I more likely load Dexed...