Also, Chromaphone 3 magically doubled its CPU demand just by adding second leayer as a "feature" ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
However, didn't have any issues with Massive X. IMO it's very efficient for what it does.
Which is the hungriest Synth CPU wise nowadays?
-
- KVRAF
- 4590 posts since 7 Jun, 2012 from Warsaw
Pigments 3.5, granular pad can quickly overload even my Ryzen 3900X
Also, Chromaphone 3 magically doubled its CPU demand just by adding second leayer as a "feature" ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
However, didn't have any issues with Massive X. IMO it's very efficient for what it does.
Also, Chromaphone 3 magically doubled its CPU demand just by adding second leayer as a "feature" ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
However, didn't have any issues with Massive X. IMO it's very efficient for what it does.
Blog ------------- YouTube channel
Tricky-Loops wrote: (...)someone like Armin van Buuren who claims to make a track in half an hour and all his songs sound somewhat boring(...)
Tricky-Loops wrote: (...)someone like Armin van Buuren who claims to make a track in half an hour and all his songs sound somewhat boring(...)
-
ApexSoundMusic ApexSoundMusic https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=465605
- KVRist
- 42 posts since 14 May, 2020
Knifonium seems to eat CPU for breakfast…
-
vitocorleone123 vitocorleone123 https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=333504
- KVRAF
- 1891 posts since 30 Jun, 2014 from Pacific NW
Pigments “the pig” in granular is very high cpu. TAL J8 can also be a monster with long release times. DiscoveryPro has forced me to use Audiogridder in order to use 32 of the 128 voices (at 96khz with fairly low ASIO buffer).
-
- KVRAF
- 3338 posts since 6 Aug, 2009
pigments is pretty hungry here; equator 2 perhaps the most of all my plugins. when diva came out, i couldn't run it, now it's perfectly happy...
-
- KVRian
- 813 posts since 11 Mar, 2010
I bet Phaseplant can be the absolute winner if you design a heavy enough preset in it (not a hard task to accomplish), with FM, unison, hardsync, polyphonic FX et all.
-
- KVRAF
- 35410 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
Good one. As if M1 was the most powerful chip in the world. And as if you couldn't easily max out a M1 as well.
Even last and current gen mid tier desktop Intel's smoke the M1...
-
- Banned
- 957 posts since 3 Apr, 2018
+1
-
- Banned
- 957 posts since 3 Apr, 2018
In Intels dreams of course
Apple M1 is not the chip itself that makes a difference, it’s combination of M1 and macOS
-
- KVRAF
- 6980 posts since 28 Dec, 2015 from Atlantis Island
Really hungry:
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
https://sonograyn.bandcamp.com/music Experimental Ambient
https://martinjuenke.bandcamp.com/music Alternative Instrumental
https://martinjuenke.bandcamp.com/music Alternative Instrumental
-
- KVRAF
- 35410 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
The M1 isn't faster than a mid tier desktop Intel i5 in benchmarks. The Apple hype train is rollin' hard.Atlatnesiti wrote: ↑Wed May 11, 2022 6:42 pmIn Intels dreams of course
Apple M1 is not the chip itself that makes a difference, it’s combination of M1 and macOS
-
- KVRian
- 707 posts since 29 Dec, 2016 from India
the apple marketing department has definitely succeeded in creating the hype they wanted if people are convinced that they only needed a single M1 chip for all their music production needschk071 wrote: ↑Wed May 11, 2022 7:07 pmThe M1 isn't faster than a mid tier desktop Intel i5 in benchmarks. The Apple hype train is rollin' hard.Atlatnesiti wrote: ↑Wed May 11, 2022 6:42 pmIn Intels dreams of course
Apple M1 is not the chip itself that makes a difference, it’s combination of M1 and macOS
Win 10 x64 with specs enough to run DAW without bouncing any track
KZ IEM,32-bit 384Khz dac running at 32bit 48Khz
mainly use REAPER, MTotalbundle, Unfiltered Audio TRIAD and LION, NI classic collection,......... ETC
KZ IEM,32-bit 384Khz dac running at 32bit 48Khz
mainly use REAPER, MTotalbundle, Unfiltered Audio TRIAD and LION, NI classic collection,......... ETC
-
- KVRAF
- 2338 posts since 28 Feb, 2015
Too bad the M1 chokes with a couple of browser windows open with a couple tabs per window, or if you have ten or more spreadsheets open at the same time. Haven't tried it much with audio software though.Atlatnesiti wrote: ↑Wed May 11, 2022 6:42 pmIn Intels dreams of course
Apple M1 is not the chip itself that makes a difference, it’s combination of M1 and macOS
i9-10900K | 128GB DDR4 | RTX 3090 | Arturia AudioFuse/KeyLab mkII/SparkLE | PreSonus ATOM/ATOM SQ | Studio One | Reason | Bitwig Studio | Reaper | Renoise | FL Studio | ~900 VSTs | 300+ REs
-
- KVRAF
- 4590 posts since 7 Jun, 2012 from Warsaw
People have been producing music on rigs many times less powerful that current tech. There's no need for latest synths with cosmic requirements, and no need for high-end CPUs either.people are convinced that they only needed a single M1 chip for all their music production needs
In fact I find high requirements of Pigements (not only CPU, but also RAM) a disadvantage as suddenly I can't spam unlimited number of tracks anymore.
Blog ------------- YouTube channel
Tricky-Loops wrote: (...)someone like Armin van Buuren who claims to make a track in half an hour and all his songs sound somewhat boring(...)
Tricky-Loops wrote: (...)someone like Armin van Buuren who claims to make a track in half an hour and all his songs sound somewhat boring(...)
-
- KVRAF
- 1902 posts since 8 Jan, 2005
I don't know where you got this from, but it's definitely false.
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html
As of May 11th M1 is obviously not at the top, but the some of them cost more than a whole Mac by itself. XEON, Threadripper, EPYC... the Core i9 12900 managed to score higher... good for Intel.
void main(dumb)
