One Synth Challenge #159: Surge XT (j5v Wins!)

[nenneb]

Although waiting longer for the final result is hard, I find it a sympathic approach to honestly name a tiny fault and give a fair chance to the lost entry! Respect! And I can imagine, that looking through 30+ forum pages for an entry is not the easiest job, but the two of you do that every month ... Thank you!
My only effort was openening the voting page once again an listen to one more track. Done!
And did I mention: Waiting longer is hard ....

[Julian Olsen]

advote done.

Cheerz

JO

[diaseis]

Voted again !

[silverpants]

Voted again

[jackoo]

added vote

[Harry_HH]

Poor instructions.
Does this mean, that all the (earlier) compleated voted lists are rejected?

Please be more spesific.

I find it pretty clear:

If you didn't even notice this whole thing, and three more days passed, everything would be fine. Your previous votes would be exactly as you cast them, and you would've automatically been assumed to award this extra track a 3.

If you want to hear that track, and possibly give it a score other than 3, it'll work exactly as you'd expect. It should be the only track in the right column on the voting page. Go vote, or don't. Your votes are safe either way.

Exactly right, thank you.

All previous votes are safe, the extra time is to enable votes for this particular track, and there will be no dq for missing this one track.

Thank you all for your patience

Still inconplete information. ”All the previous votes are safe” doesn’ t give the anwer to my main point: when I have voted the then-complete-list, and you have now added a new track, is my voting-lust accepted, without completing my vote with the added track?

Rules are: you have you give votes for all the tracks in the list, otherwise your list (any of your vote) is accepted.
Therefore my request to elaborate and be spesific, is not splitting hair, but drills to the fundamental, main point.

After I have used 4 h listening and evaluating the tracjs, is it too much asked to be communicative, and confirm what I ask?

[Korg Supporter]

Poor instructions.
Does this mean, that all the (earlier) compleated voted lists are rejected?

Please be more spesific.

I find it pretty clear:

If you didn't even notice this whole thing, and three more days passed, everything would be fine. Your previous votes would be exactly as you cast them, and you would've automatically been assumed to award this extra track a 3.

If you want to hear that track, and possibly give it a score other than 3, it'll work exactly as you'd expect. It should be the only track in the right column on the voting page. Go vote, or don't. Your votes are safe either way.

Exactly right, thank you.

All previous votes are safe, the extra time is to enable votes for this particular track, and there will be no dq for missing this one track.

Thank you all for your patience

Still inconplete information. ”All the previous votes are safe” doesn’ t give the anwer to my main point: when I have voted the then-complete-list, and you have now added a new track, is my voting-lust accepted, without completing my vote with the added track?

Rules are: you have you give votes for all the tracks in the list, otherwise your list (any of your vote) is accepted.
Therefore my request to elaborate and be spesific, is not splitting hair, but drills to the fundamental, main point.

After I have used 4 h listening and evaluating the tracjs, is it too much asked to be communicative, and confirm what I ask?

It says on the front page that voting for the new track is optional, and if it is not voted, it automatically receives a 3.

[Harry_HH]

Poor instructions.
Does this mean, that all the (earlier) compleated voted lists are rejected?

Please be more spesific.

I find it pretty clear:

If you didn't even notice this whole thing, and three more days passed, everything would be fine. Your previous votes would be exactly as you cast them, and you would've automatically been assumed to award this extra track a 3.

If you want to hear that track, and possibly give it a score other than 3, it'll work exactly as you'd expect. It should be the only track in the right column on the voting page. Go vote, or don't. Your votes are safe either way.

Exactly right, thank you.

All previous votes are safe, the extra time is to enable votes for this particular track, and there will be no dq for missing this one track.

Thank you all for your patience

Still inconplete information. ”All the previous votes are safe” doesn’ t give the anwer to my main point: when I have voted the then-complete-list, and you have now added a new track, is my voting-lust accepted, without completing my vote with the added track?

Rules are: you have you give votes for all the tracks in the list, otherwise your list (any of your vote) is accepted.
Therefore my request to elaborate and be spesific, is not splitting hair, but drills to the fundamental, main point.

After I have used 4 h listening and evaluating the tracjs, is it too much asked to be communicative, and confirm what I ask?

It says on the front page that voting for the new track is optional, and if it is not voted, it automatically receives a 3.

Thank you.
Expecting people searching answer from the ”small print somewhere”, in this exceptional situation, is too much to ask, in my opinion. Therefore repeating things/rules is good policy.

[jemaudio]

Voted again.

@Yadrichik, I wish your mother gets better soon. You are doing the right thing as a son. I lost my father last summer and have some regrets about not taking off sooner from work to spend more time with him. I hope you come back to this wonderful community of talented people when the time is right. Your music connects pretty much with me.

[VCA-089]

Re-Voted

[marks-a-whybikky]

... uhh, i forgot to announce that i voted ... sorry!
now I have voted

Thanks a lot to all for your very nice comments on my track!

[Juergen]

Voted again!

[Impedance Music]

Re-Voted!

[Double Tap]

Poor instructions.
Does this mean, that all the (earlier) compleated voted lists are rejected?

Please be more spesific.

I find it pretty clear:

If you didn't even notice this whole thing, and three more days passed, everything would be fine. Your previous votes would be exactly as you cast them, and you would've automatically been assumed to award this extra track a 3.

If you want to hear that track, and possibly give it a score other than 3, it'll work exactly as you'd expect. It should be the only track in the right column on the voting page. Go vote, or don't. Your votes are safe either way.

Exactly right, thank you.

All previous votes are safe, the extra time is to enable votes for this particular track, and there will be no dq for missing this one track.

Thank you all for your patience

Still inconplete information. ”All the previous votes are safe” doesn’ t give the anwer to my main point: when I have voted the then-complete-list, and you have now added a new track, is my voting-lust accepted, without completing my vote with the added track?

Rules are: you have you give votes for all the tracks in the list, otherwise your list (any of your vote) is accepted.
Therefore my request to elaborate and be spesific, is not splitting hair, but drills to the fundamental, main point.

After I have used 4 h listening and evaluating the tracjs, is it too much asked to be communicative, and confirm what I ask?

It says on the front page that voting for the new track is optional, and if it is not voted, it automatically receives a 3.

Thank you.
Expecting people searching answer from the ”small print somewhere”, in this exceptional situation, is too much to ask, in my opinion. Therefore repeating things/rules is good policy.

When people volunteer to run a competition for a community for free, is it too much to ask to be polite to them?

[Rahodees]

Thank you.
Expecting people searching answer from the ”small print somewhere”, in this exceptional situation, is too much to ask, in my opinion. Therefore repeating things/rules is good policy.

The very first reply you received in this thread contained the following words addressing the question of what happens if you don't vote on the new track: "Your previous votes would be exactly as you cast them, and you would've automatically been assumed to award this extra track a 3."

That is one hundred percent clear.

Communication is important, as you say. Part of communicating is receiving information. Please consider what you bring to the table in that regard.