tumface wrote: Sat Apr 11, 2026 8:26 pmAh yes, that makes total sense. Thanks.himalaya wrote: Sat Apr 11, 2026 10:28 am The highs are easy to control, sure, there is the 'Damp' parameter there after all, but that's not what I'm referring to. The spectral balance of some of the sounds (mostly, textures, sustained, open sounds) can be very saturated with mid-high frequencies and peaks that need to be dealt with somehow and without a good EQ it's not possible. So, I could arrive at this scenario: I have a sound where I want to preserve the very top end (ie: I do not wish to use a LPF/Damp) but I need to cut some mid-high frequencies to balance the sound. That is not possible. A cut at, say, 1K, 3K, 5K and boom, all of sudden the sound is perfect.
It shouldn't be surprising to wish for a good parametric EQ in a synth like RB, one that can output such complex spectra. In a standard VA, one is not needed, but here it is badly needed.
Actually, I don't think it's weird to wish for a parametric EQ. I was only surprised that it was the #1 request, but now it makes sense.
I think it could be cool to have a polyphonic keytracked EQ, too. (I really like this feature in synths that have it, like Zebra 3, Filterscape VA, and Phase Plant.)
It was number 1 request for me since RayBlaster is a perfect little synth otherwise, well maybe if it had another FX page too, then it would be perfect in this context: power vs ease of use.
and because I've spent a lot of time with vintage analog synths lately (massive sampling sessions of vintage gear, yet again, ouch) it was so refreshing to go back to a synth like RB, one that has such powerful unapologetic digital sound. It just it needs a little taming with user editable EQ (and not some system generic optimisation, you hear Markus?) .

