Great discussion. The grid system is so natural to me that as I noted elsewhere this is exactly the instrument I've been looking for for years. I've had mine just since xmas and am already feeling quite comfortable with chord shapes, major scale runs etc.. but that's no surprise given I'm a guitar player (or at least I've been pretending for a long time, hahah). (As an aside: What is a surprise to me is that I'm also gravitating to the aug 4th (+6) tuning even though I'm used to the scale shapes for fourths. They are exactly the same if you think along a diagonal.)
I wanted to turn this conversation in a slightly different direction, perhaps this is better as a new thread..or has been covered well elsewhere (looked but didn't see anything directly addressing):
zachaudioguy wrote: Mon Dec 13, 2021 7:56 pm
The two major factors that make LinnStrument a pleasure when it comes to practicing music theory [is] the ability to light up custom note patterns/scales. This means once you learn a certain pattern for a chord or an interval it's going to be played the same everywhere on the instrument. And you can quickly toggle lights on and off to help visualize the patterns that these chords and intervals make.
...
In the end you don't want the lit notes to become a crutch, you want them to be a tool for learning the muscle memory. There is a pre-built feature that lets you toggle between different scales, but I might recommend punching in the notes by hand at first to keep that theory side of your brain activated.
This is the crux of the question I've been puzzling with.. the merits of transposing vs. keeping a fixed C rooted layout. The lazy me (I'm a software developer so "lazy" means "smart" to me) wants to simply transpose everything to the key and mode I want so I get all of the "nice" notes lit up for my untrained brain. The ambitious me wants to learn to move freely outside the boundaries of those notes and needs a lot of help learning to sight read.
This essential contradiction seems to be at the heart of what I gather is a major pedagogical controversy in academic music circles -- whether to teach students relative Do-Re-Mi (German and a lot of N. American systems) vs Fixed (Romantic + top conservatories). see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solf%C3%A8ge for way more than you probably want to know about that..
Here are the advantages I can see to either approach:
_Transposing Layout_
1. You have a clear map for exactly what notes make sense to play, regardless of key or mode. (Duh!) It's easier and more immediatly rewarding.
2. Of course, it's hard to ignore the fact that Roger built the Linnstrument with those amazing lighted up squares precisely so that you can do things like transpose, why not get your money's worth?
3. You (arguably) gain a greater grasp of the deeper aspects of music theory because you can visually (not just kinesthetically) focus on what's "really" important -- the relationship between notes and chords, not the actual pitch.
4. It's quite easy to change keys as needed. (But is this really practical during performance?)
_Fixed Layout_
1. You can directly and consistently translate location and lighting on keyboards to musical staff, greatly facilitating visual -> muscle memory for sight reading. Of course, unlike Linnstrument, musical notation is not nicely transposed for you! (Spoiler: this is the only one that I really care about.)
2. Your brain has to learn to do the heavy lifting itself, and actually deeply understand what is happening vs. just "playing the white keys". i.e. you don't get subtly trapped in diatonic land.*
3. Unlike Piano, you are still able to utilize same chord structure and scale patterns, perhaps leading you toward more of a grasp of how western scale system works.
4. For those trained in fixed approach, key changes are no problem, or more correctly no more of a problem than playing anything but C Major!
5. Related, when improvising with others or playing complex atonal pieces or whatever you don't have to try to guess what the tonic is or experience the cognitive dissonance of picking an arbitrary key and thinking it's the appropriate one.
* "Those trained in fixed-do will argue that their act is the analogue of reading aloud in a language. Just as one reads this very sentence without parsing it grammatically, so too fixed-do is the direct sounding of the music. Where the movable-do system requires constant real-time analysis of the tonality and modulations in the score, in fixed-do the musician uses knowledge of the changing tonality to understand for example that the pitch class c-natural is the supertonic in B-Flat major or minor, and the dominant when the music modulates to F-major, but the c-note remains the same pitch."
So what I'm super curious about is what approach experienced musicians / linnstrument players are using?
And taking it further, are there ways folks have found to find a good balance /hybrid between each of the approaches?
As a note regarding that that one of the cool things about guitar is with capo or barre chords you can use same shapes, but the physicality of where you are remains essentially static. I see that you can achieve the same effect on Linnstrument by always changing the pitch and lights tranpose to the same value.