Except if I do it I'll be suspended.revvy wrote: Tue Jun 16, 2020 5:53 am Staw men all over this thread. If bones and anx are allowed to serially insult others, we should all be allowed. If we are not, then neither should they be.
I would personally prefer it if we all had to be civil. Not the case? Then bring it on, I don't need protection from them.
Upcoming Synapse OB-Xa: Obsession
- KVRAF
- 22876 posts since 8 Oct, 2014
-
- Banned
- 8 posts since 16 Jun, 2020
I agree, but when moderator Hink is supporting this thing called favouritism, you cant really have any fair treatment.revvy wrote: Tue Jun 16, 2020 5:53 am Staw men all over this thread. If bones and anx are allowed to serially insult others, we should all be allowed. If we are not, then neither should they be.
I would personally prefer it if we all had to be civil. Not the case? Then bring it on, I don't need protection from them.
The least he could do is ban AnX and Bones and resign from moderators and . But hey, its not fair ban your friends right? only those you dont like or have no attatchment is fair to do so
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- KVRAF
- 5444 posts since 15 Feb, 2020
For the record I don't think nor am I claiming Hink is the issue here.obsessed wrote: Tue Jun 16, 2020 9:44 amI agree, but when moderator Hink is supporting this thing called favouritism, you cant really have any fair treatment.revvy wrote: Tue Jun 16, 2020 5:53 am Staw men all over this thread. If bones and anx are allowed to serially insult others, we should all be allowed. If we are not, then neither should they be.
I would personally prefer it if we all had to be civil. Not the case? Then bring it on, I don't need protection from them.![]()
The least he could do is ban AnX and Bones and resign from moderators and . But hey, its not fair ban your friends right? only those you dont like or have no attatchment is fair to do soor if not, maybe unban some of the users?
I lost my heart in Cap de Creus
- addled muppet weed
- 111242 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
is it tomorrow yet?
- addled muppet weed
- 111242 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
i can never eat on a full stomach either.
-
- KVRist
- 108 posts since 14 Jan, 2020
a bot should be written that auto-replies with this to BONES every time he writes "ladder filter" in a postFunkybot's Evil Twin wrote: Tue Jun 16, 2020 5:11 amYou know it can suck at high resonance bass sounds and still be good at other things right? Like maybe high resonance bass sounds aren't a sound we all want all the time, but maybe it sounds amazing for lower resonance bass sounds. Like most synth basslines of the 70s to miss 80s. Or maybe that particular resonance trait works well on other sources where you won't need as much bass in the mix like certain lead sounds. No one's saying that the Moog ladder filter doesn't lose bass at high resonance. It does. Where you get into arguments is by not understanding that your opinion on the overall quality of the filter is an "irrefutable fact." Other people may still love the sound of it for other reasons. It's like saying Ferraris are terrible cars because you can't fit your luggage in the trunk. Like ok.... Yeah, that may not be a thing they do well. But if you're buying one, it obviously shouldn't be for the trunk space. If you want a high res bass sound that holds the bottom, you don't use a Moog filter. That one trait isn't the only criteria by which all filters are judged.
- addled muppet weed
- 111242 posts since 26 Jan, 2003 from through the looking glass
you think? 
-
- Banned
- 8 posts since 16 Jun, 2020
