Replacing the Arts Acoustic Reverb
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 852 posts since 12 May, 2004
I see others have convinced mholloway the AAR is not silicon-compliant. I took a screenshot of my copy of AAR run through ArchiChect for an absolute verification. AAR not being silicon compliant was the whole point of starting this thread.
When Apple finally kills of Rosetta from the OS, it'll be adios for AAR on that system.
I will be looking into the LiquidSonics Tai Chi suggestion as a replacement. As an owner of Reverberate 3, I am familiar with the quality of LiquidSonics products. After some initial research, it would appear that Tai Chi uses an algorithmic engine. If it was an impulse engine, I'd have to pass. Reverberate kinda handles that.
When Apple finally kills of Rosetta from the OS, it'll be adios for AAR on that system.
I will be looking into the LiquidSonics Tai Chi suggestion as a replacement. As an owner of Reverberate 3, I am familiar with the quality of LiquidSonics products. After some initial research, it would appear that Tai Chi uses an algorithmic engine. If it was an impulse engine, I'd have to pass. Reverberate kinda handles that.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
On a number of Macs
-
- KVRAF
- 2429 posts since 11 Jan, 2009 from Portland, OR, USA
And here I thought the "point of (your) thread" is how to meaningfully *replace* AAR....but yes, I get it, I very get it, it's using Rosetta on my mac. I've always been amazed it runs at all. And I've always been fully aware that I'd LOVE to find a suitable replacement for it since clearly this won't last much longer... nobody is arguing these points, I was simply asserting that it "still worked" on a mac, as of right now.
Last edited by mholloway on Mon Jan 05, 2026 9:32 pm, edited 3 times in total.
-
- KVRAF
- 2429 posts since 11 Jan, 2009 from Portland, OR, USA
dbl post
- KVRAF
- 14436 posts since 16 Feb, 2005 from Planet Earth, Somewhere
I haven't used AAR in years, probably over a decade...but the reverb that works great on synths (albeit, limited) is the Softube release of the reverb of the Model 77 as a separate vst..
rsp
rsp
sound sculptist
-
- KVRian
- 694 posts since 9 Dec, 2021
Imo Tai Chi is not a replacement, and I actually don't like it that much in the end, I regret buying it (selling it rn). The main selling point of it was the chorus engine that's inspired by the 224 hardware and the chorus in RC24 (softube 224 clone) and tbh the chorus in that sounds better. The chorus and tail movement of Tai Chi is kind of uninspiring to me, low amount then it's too static and almost metallic, but more than that it's too detuned - And this is where AAR differs the most, because of that 1 modulation knob, it's one of the nicest sounding modulation in a reverb, perfect for "huge, ethereal, lush, unreal" fx reverb type, AAR actually sounds quite metallic when you turn it off. I don't use it for realistic/room sim settings, just the big fx ones.
Also the attack and spread in AAR have nicer curves, it feels more like an extension of the source, whereas in Tai Chi its sound + verb.
AAR was actually what I was looking for instead of Tai Chi (I tried probably all the currently premium reverbs atm)
(ofc this is subjective)
Also the attack and spread in AAR have nicer curves, it feels more like an extension of the source, whereas in Tai Chi its sound + verb.
AAR was actually what I was looking for instead of Tai Chi (I tried probably all the currently premium reverbs atm)
(ofc this is subjective)
-
Winstontaneous Winstontaneous https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=98336
- KVRAF
- 2591 posts since 15 Feb, 2006 from Another Green World
Does anyone have demos of Arts Acoustic, say comparing same track dry, with AAR, and other reverbs?
I've never AAR but have heard a lot about it over the years. I'm an algorithmic reverb junkie so am curious how it sounds, thanks!
I've never AAR but have heard a lot about it over the years. I'm an algorithmic reverb junkie so am curious how it sounds, thanks!
-
- KVRer
- 13 posts since 2 Mar, 2022
Agree with your remarks on detune and spread/attack, AAR wins therejtsterays wrote: Mon Jan 05, 2026 11:59 pm Imo Tai Chi is not a replacement, and I actually don't like it that much in the end, I regret buying it (selling it rn). The main selling point of it was the chorus engine that's inspired by the 224 hardware and the chorus in RC24 (softube 224 clone) and tbh the chorus in that sounds better. The chorus and tail movement of Tai Chi is kind of uninspiring to me, low amount then it's too static and almost metallic, but more than that it's too detuned - And this is where AAR differs the most, because of that 1 modulation knob, it's one of the nicest sounding modulation in a reverb, perfect for "huge, ethereal, lush, unreal" fx reverb type, AAR actually sounds quite metallic when you turn it off. I don't use it for realistic/room sim settings, just the big fx ones.
Also the attack and spread in AAR have nicer curves, it feels more like an extension of the source, whereas in Tai Chi its sound + verb.
AAR was actually what I was looking for instead of Tai Chi (I tried probably all the currently premium reverbs atm)
(ofc this is subjective)
- KVRAF
- 6208 posts since 25 Dec, 2004
Tai Chi does a lot, has chorus and shimmer, bit crusher, dynamics, diffusion and the multipliers. If you're looking for dah tarnce verb then maybe that Polyverse one is up your street? the Rob Papen algos are quite taharncey too. Modulated metal powders and infinite t-harnce.
sketches... http://soundcloud.com/onesnzeros
some artists i support... https://bandcamp.com/spectraselecta
some artists i support... https://bandcamp.com/spectraselecta
-
- KVRer
- 13 posts since 2 Mar, 2022
ADPTR Utopia is also nice. Sounds also as wet as AAR, only the reverb has a slow attack. So the reverb is not glued to the sound as AAR does. I cannot make it act the same as AAr.
Utopia Again is synth + reverb, instead of one nice synth sound with reverb combined.
Utopia Again is synth + reverb, instead of one nice synth sound with reverb combined.
-
- KVRAF
- 2429 posts since 11 Jan, 2009 from Portland, OR, USA
Nobody mentioned Trance but you.... There are numerous uses for a "synth verb" beyond Trance music.sqigls wrote: Tue Jan 06, 2026 9:46 am Tai Chi does a lot, has chorus and shimmer, bit crusher, dynamics, diffusion and the multipliers. If you're looking for dah tarnce verb then maybe that Polyverse one is up your street? the Rob Papen algos are quite taharncey too. Modulated metal powders and infinite t-harnce.
- KVRAF
- 6208 posts since 25 Dec, 2004
no, only for tarnce
sketches... http://soundcloud.com/onesnzeros
some artists i support... https://bandcamp.com/spectraselecta
some artists i support... https://bandcamp.com/spectraselecta
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 852 posts since 12 May, 2004
I'm pretty sure I pointed this out earlier in the post: I bought Future Verb and I can tell you unequivocally that it sounds nothing like the AAR. The problem with Future Verb is that its tails sound artificially "noisy" to me. It just doesn't sound the same as AAR does with the same material. Do a side by side comparison for yourself. Mind you, Future Verb is not a bad sounding reverb at all. I didn't buy it to replace the AAR though.mcligge2 wrote: Mon Jan 26, 2026 1:52 pm PS the ValhallaFutureVerb is actually really impressive. It is recently released and it sounds very good. Check it out, gives AAR vibes with certain settings
BTW, I still haven't found anything that gets close to the AAR yet. Still looking.
On a number of Macs
-
- KVRian
- 860 posts since 22 Jan, 2022
Utopia is amazing. No experience with AAR so can't comment on whether it's a viable replacement.
