about the prize money
-
- KVRAF
- 8388 posts since 11 Apr, 2003 from back on the hillside again - but now with a garden!
..mmm.. lets see what's there when it comes to voting time..
I think the 'runners up' should be awarded the non-cash prizes that have been donated, on a highest gets the pick system (so first runnerup gets first choice; final runner up gets what is left).
#Top winners = #Entrants - #non-cash prizes
Split the cash between the Top winners.
I was kinda assuming that was in mind, but I thought it would be worth actually spelling out. If the number of entrants ends up being huge, then maybe consider a different approach.
DSP
I think the 'runners up' should be awarded the non-cash prizes that have been donated, on a highest gets the pick system (so first runnerup gets first choice; final runner up gets what is left).
#Top winners = #Entrants - #non-cash prizes
Split the cash between the Top winners.
I was kinda assuming that was in mind, but I thought it would be worth actually spelling out. If the number of entrants ends up being huge, then maybe consider a different approach.
DSP
Last edited by duncanparsons on Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRist
- 326 posts since 9 Apr, 2003 from Tragorden
i say give the winner a big fat prize
in the good spirit of the initiator
the runners up i have no opinion about
how about a special prize for something innovative with great potential but perhaps lacking in execution?
in the good spirit of the initiator
the runners up i have no opinion about
how about a special prize for something innovative with great potential but perhaps lacking in execution?
-
- KVRian
- 975 posts since 31 Jan, 2005
Let me put ut this way:
3:2:1 is fine, there are other prizes that are not money aswell. What would 10$ give you?
3:2:1 is fine, there are other prizes that are not money aswell. What would 10$ give you?
-
- DC TC
- Topic Starter
- 2518 posts since 30 May, 2004
hmmm. right now, i'm thinking maybe we should do the "runners up get the other prizes". makes more sense, don't you think. i mean the random name thing is exciting and fun and all but it might be heartbreaking eg. if the 4th place person didn't get anything because their name didn't get drawn.
- KVRian
- 1434 posts since 21 Nov, 2005 from The Netherlands
Agreed.tuz wrote:hmmm. right now, i'm thinking maybe we should do the "runners up get the other prizes". makes more sense, don't you think.
-
- KVRAF
- 1942 posts since 22 Mar, 2002 from Timisoara, Romania
i say.
50 % - place 1
30 % - place 2
20 % - place 3
seems fair ...
50 % - place 1
30 % - place 2
20 % - place 3
seems fair ...