Somebody tried Harrison Mixbus for Windows?

Audio Plugin Hosts and other audio software applications discussion
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS
Mixbus

Post

It's released also for Windows, has somebody tested it? What do you think about it?

http://www.harrisonconsoles.com/mixbus/website/

Post

I didn't realize they had a Win version. I have a version 1 OSX license so I'll download and give it a go.

Thanks for the heads up.

P.S. I don't see any upgrade pricing on the website though.

Post

I just tried it under Linux : seems a very well tailored re-use of Ardour, very fine for audio, with good plugins. Excellent for an audio recording studio, but it has no midi tracks.
I'm impatient too to see the windwos port of Ardour in action...
You can't always get what you waaaant...

Post

never thought I wouls see the day...

THIS DAW SOUNDS BETTER LOL!!!!!

it says so right on their page :party:

Post

I don't know if it's the best sounding DAW out there, but it really sound very very good!

Post

I waiting for them to send me my windows license...ardour for windows!!!

Post

There is a "ipps-5.1.dll" missing so the scanning of VST plug-ins is not working. Has somebody get Mixbus working on Windows 7?

Btw. Shell plug-ins are not supported so Waves will not work.

Post

4damind wrote:There is a "ipps-5.1.dll" missing so the scanning of VST plug-ins is not working. Has somebody get Mixbus working on Windows 7?

Btw. Shell plug-ins are not supported so Waves will not work.
Waves still uses a shell?? I thought they went native VST years ago?

Post

aMUSEd wrote:Waves still uses a shell??
Yep. And as luck would have it the shell doesn't work in Tracktion, Reaper, minihost, EnergyXT, FLStudio or Wavelab 7. Not for me anyway. If not for shell2vst written by xlutop I couldn't even use my Waves plugins.
Intel Core i7 8700K, 16gb, Windows 10 Pro, Focusrite Scarlet 6i6

Post

4damind wrote:There is a "ipps-5.1.dll" missing so the scanning of VST plug-ins is not working. Has somebody get Mixbus working on Windows 7?

Btw. Shell plug-ins are not supported so Waves will not work.
ipps-5.1.dll is related to a vst plugin, not to Mixbus.
Install this plugin demo and you'll be ok:
http://monumentalaudio.com/ACQUA/N-TEN- ... REE-32.zip
It worked for me....

Post

Yes, Acoustica Audio is the problem, it uses this Intel lib! I've not installed the demo but it's a Nebula based plug-in so I got the idea about the problem)

Btw. the guys from Harrison are very quick with help and answers. VST support will also improved in the future (this time it's more a limited VST support).
There will also be an update shortly which helps to manage plugins more thoroughly.

Post

morelia wrote:
aMUSEd wrote:Waves still uses a shell??
Yep. And as luck would have it the shell doesn't work in Tracktion, Reaper, minihost, EnergyXT, FLStudio or Wavelab 7. Not for me anyway. If not for shell2vst written by xlutop I couldn't even use my Waves plugins.
Amazing considering how much they charge. I know they used to use this shell to wrap their dx versions - does that mean they are still making these as primarily dx plugins? - they must be about the only developers still using that format if so.

Post

I love the design (and price) of this app! Looking forward to hearing from someone's hands-on experience with the Windows version.
Music is something you DO. Spend time, not money.
http://www.myspace.com/skipkent
http://soundcloud.com/skipkent

Post

skipkent wrote:I love the design (and price) of this app! Looking forward to hearing from someone's hands-on experience with the Windows version.
Download the Win demo and give it a spin...

http://www.harrisonconsoles.com/mixbus/ ... chase.html

Post

aMUSEd wrote:
morelia wrote:
aMUSEd wrote:Waves still uses a shell??
Yep. And as luck would have it the shell doesn't work in Tracktion, Reaper, minihost, EnergyXT, FLStudio or Wavelab 7. Not for me anyway. If not for shell2vst written by xlutop I couldn't even use my Waves plugins.
Amazing considering how much they charge. I know they used to use this shell to wrap their dx versions - does that mean they are still making these as primarily dx plugins? - they must be about the only developers still using that format if so.
The plugins might just be so bloated with code they need to use, that the shell system might allow them to do at least some kind of optimization size wise. (ie, the shell plugin contains the library code and the individual plugins then import the code from the shell).

Post Reply

Return to “Hosts & Applications (Sequencers, DAWs, Audio Editors, etc.)”