Login / Register 0 items | $0.00 New @ KVR
This forum is sponsored by
T-RackS Group Buy! Up to 5 free mixing and mastering processors!

T-RackS Group Buy

Easy-to-reach tiers, up to 5 free processors.

Mixing and mastering processors, including Lurssen Mastering Console.

Read more at www.ikmultimedia.com
Iva
KVRist
 
94 posts since 22 Apr, 2009, from Russia

Postby Iva; Sat Aug 11, 2018 9:37 am Re: Alternatives to GlissEQ?

DMGAudio equilibrium does it too
MaxC
KVRist
 
176 posts since 15 Feb, 2004

Postby MaxC; Sun Aug 12, 2018 5:57 pm Re: Alternatives to GlissEQ?

iZotope Neutron is also great for this purpose. Not only will it allow you to monitor and EQ two tracks simultaneously, you can pair inverse filters across tracks, and you can even sidechain a frequency band on one track to the filter of a second track to create space dynamically. It also has the collision meter to help you quickly recognize competing frequency ranges. Considering everything else that comes with Neutron, I'd give it a long hard look. I'm a fan of GlissEQ as well, but Neutron made more sense from an investment standpoint.
MogwaiBoy
KVRAF
 
2636 posts since 26 Nov, 2015, from Way Downunder

Postby MogwaiBoy; Sun Aug 12, 2018 6:54 pm Re: Alternatives to GlissEQ?

MaxC wrote:you can even sidechain a frequency band on one track to the filter of a second track to create space dynamically.


Like TrackSpacer? Is there a youtube vid on how to do this? I've used the collision detection but I have to admit I haven't used Neutron 2 very much since upgrading... I love using the individual modules but haven't ventured too far into the main plugin. It's obviously way more powerful than I first thought.
Previous

Moderator: Moderators (Main)

Return to Effects