Hornet Autogain pro mk2 out!

VST, AU, etc. plug-in Virtual Effects discussion
KVRian
512 posts since 6 Dec, 2014

Post Tue Oct 25, 2016 5:21 am

https://www.hornetplugins.com/plugins/h ... n-pro-mk2/

I love my mk1. it has saved my time! It is one of must have for me!

and I've just found news about Mk2 on his FB!

Looks cool!

KVRist
458 posts since 10 Apr, 2011

Post Tue Oct 25, 2016 5:38 am

nicksohn wrote: I love my mk1. it has saved my time! It is one of must have for me!
How do you use it?

KVRian

Topic Starter

512 posts since 6 Dec, 2014

Post Tue Oct 25, 2016 7:10 am

mementus wrote:
nicksohn wrote: I love my mk1. it has saved my time! It is one of must have for me!
How do you use it?
I use it for almost every vocal track.

User avatar
KVRian
1008 posts since 31 Aug, 2004

Post Tue Oct 25, 2016 8:54 am

great GUI and really robust in features wise
Pros ever tell you "What to do with the EQ" but never mention what EQ to use as it really does not matter if you do the right thing.

KVRist
485 posts since 10 Aug, 2004

Post Tue Oct 25, 2016 11:25 am

Has anybody compared this to Melda's MAutoVolume?

KVRer
4 posts since 11 Feb, 2014

Post Wed Oct 26, 2016 12:01 pm

Yes. I have the same question. Looking at both of these products to speed up workflow. Anybody got any thoughts on which one is better?

KVRist
478 posts since 15 Jan, 2009

Post Fri Oct 28, 2016 12:27 am

sidrat wrote:Has anybody compared this to Melda's MAutoVolume?

Or for that matter, TBProAudio Gainrider 2.

User avatar
KVRAF
3835 posts since 29 Sep, 2010 from Maui

Post Fri Oct 28, 2016 3:46 am

I have both, MAutoVolume is probably slightly more advanced
technically speaking. Hornet AutoGain is probably more
flexible creativity wise and easier to use and understand.

Melda's does have surround support, up-sampling, AGC etc.
Hornet's has twice the number of detectors, more source options,
a much greater gain range, an (arguably) better UI, half the price etc.

Other than that, they are basically just envelope followers,
with a generally similar parameter set, not super sophisticated
calculatory beasts or anything.

If you don't need surround, theres nothing particularly compelling
about MAutoVolume over Hornet AutoGain Pro. IMO anyway...

I prefer the Hornet plug-in generally, including the old version.

-Cheers

Return to “Effects”